Quantum simulations with cold trapped ions
Open accessAbstract
The control of internal and motional quantum degrees of freedom of laser-cooled trapped ions has been subject to intense theoretical and experimental research for about three decades. In the realm of quantum information science, the ability to deterministically prepare and measure quantum states of trapped ions is unprecedented. This expertise may be employed to investigate physical models conceived to describe systems that are not directly accessible for experimental investigations. Here, we give an overview of current theoretical proposals and experiments for such quantum simulations with trapped ions. This includes various spin models (e.g. the quantum transverse Ising model or a neural network), the Bose–Hubbard Hamiltonian, the Frenkel–Kontorova model, and quantum fields and relativistic effects.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Trapped ions allow for exceptional control of experimental parameters, and initialization and read-out can be achieved with high fidelity.
“Trapped ions are particularly interesting for the purpose of quantum simulation [19, 20, 21], as they allow for exceptional control of experimental parameters, and initialization and read-out can be achieved with high fidelity.”
From Quantum simulation of the Dirac equation (2010) · cites this paper as [20]
Merkl et al. described the Zitterbewegung of ultra-cold atoms moving in one dimension and interacting with laser beams in a tripod system.
“Merkl et al. [81] described the ZB of ultra-cold atoms moving in one-dimension and interacting with laser beams in a tripod system.”
From Zitterbewegung (trembling motion) of electrons in semiconductors: a review (2011) · cites this paper as [81]
Section 6.4.2 discusses simulating Zitterbewegung with trapped ions, not Merkl et al.’s proposed ultra-cold-atom tripod system. Searches for “Merkl” and “tripod” found no passage addressing that specific claim; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the Merkl et al. system, the decay time of Zitterbewegung is inversely proportional to the k spread of a wave packet and the oscillation amplitude decreases as t^-1/2.
“It was shown explicitly that in this case the decay time of ZB is inversely proportional to the k spread of a wave packet and that the oscillation amplitude decreases as t -1 / 2 .”
From Zitterbewegung (trembling motion) of electrons in semiconductors: a review (2011) · cites this paper as [81]
Section 6.4.2 (page unavailable) discusses Zitterbewegung in trapped ions and gives formulas for its frequency and amplitude, but not a decay law. Searches for Merkl, wave-packet k spread, decay time, and t^-1/2 found no passage addressing the claimed relationships. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe decay time of Zitterbewegung is inversely proportional to the momentum spread Δk of the wave packet.
“One can show that the decay time is inversely proportional to the momentum spread ∆ k of the wave packet, see (16) and References [17, 81].”
From Zitterbewegung (trembling motion) of electrons in semiconductors: a review (2011) · cites this paper as [81]
Section 6.4.2 discusses Zitterbewegung’s frequency and amplitude and how to measure an ion’s position and momentum over time, but gives no relationship between decay time and wave-packet momentum spread. Searches for that inverse proportionality and for momentum width Δk found no passage addressing it; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe decay time of Zitterbewegung is usually much longer in one-dimensional systems.
“The decay time is usually much longer in one-dimensional systems, see Figure 4 and References [17, 81].”
From Zitterbewegung (trembling motion) of electrons in semiconductors: a review (2011) · cites this paper as [81]
Section 6.1 describes a one-dimensional Dirac simulation, and section 6.4.2 discusses the frequency and amplitude of Zitterbewegung. Neither passage addresses its decay time or compares decay times across dimensions (searched: decay time, damping, lifetime). (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The space dependence of the particle mass describes interaction with a scalar Lorentz potential, and the substitution p_x → p_x - i f(x) σ_z corresponds to a non-minimal coupling essential to describe the relativistic DO.
“The space dependence of the particle mass m is known to describe the particle interaction with a scalar Lorentz potential, whereas the substitution p x → p x -if ( x ) σ z corresponds to a non-minimal coupling which is essential to describe the relativistic DO (see, for instance, [63]).”
From Classical simulation of relativistic quantum mechanics in periodic optical structures (2011) · cites this paper as [63]
Section 6.1 discusses simulating the Dirac Hamiltonian with trapped ions, but does not describe a position-dependent particle mass as a scalar Lorentz potential or the stated momentum substitution as non-minimal coupling. Searches for “Dirac oscillator,” “scalar Lorentz potential,” and “non-minimal coupling” found no passage addressing those claims in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe negative-energy (positron) spectrum of the one-dimensional DO is given by Eq. (24).
“whereas the negative-energy spectrum (positron branch) is given by”
From Classical simulation of relativistic quantum mechanics in periodic optical structures (2011) · cites this paper as [63]
Section 6.1 describes a one-dimensional Dirac Hamiltonian, and section 6.4.3 discusses negative-energy states in the Klein paradox. Neither gives the negative-energy spectrum of a one-dimensional Dirac oscillator. Searches for “Dirac oscillator,” “positron branch,” and equation (24) found no passage addressing that spectrum; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe DO model is obtained from the free Dirac equation by introducing an external potential via a non-minimal coupling.
“The DO model is obtained from the free Dirac equation by the introduction of the external potential via a non-minimal coupling [57,59,63].”
From Classical simulation of relativistic quantum mechanics in periodic optical structures (2011) · cites this paper as [63]
The discussion of Dirac simulations in section 6.4.1 describes a free-particle Dirac Hamiltonian, while section 6.4.3 adds a potential step to simulate the Klein paradox. Neither passage addresses the Dirac oscillator (DO) model or says that it is obtained through non-minimal coupling; searches for both terms found no such passage in our copy. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredA particularly promising approach uses trapped ions, with which several quantum simulations have recently been performed.
“A particularly promising approach uses trapped ions [9-11] with which several quantum simulations have recently been performed.”
From Quantum Simulation of the Klein Paradox with Trapped Ions (2011) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Hebb, D. O. (2005) · doi:10.4324/9781410612403 · Cited by 9,825 · see citing works
Simulating physics with computers
Feynman, R. P. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02650179 · Cited by 7,691 · see citing works
Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms
Greiner, M., Mandel, O., Esslinger, T., Hänsch, T. W., & Bloch, I. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415039a · Cited by 5,935 · see citing works
Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system
Leggett, A. J., Chakravarty, S., Dorsey, A. T., Fisher, M. P. A., Garg, A., & Zwerger, W. (1987) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.59.1 · Cited by 5,109 · see citing works
Entanglement in many-body systems
Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A., & Vedral, V. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.517 · Cited by 3,745 · see citing works
Quantum Computations with Cold Trapped Ions
Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4091 · Cited by 3,733 · see citing works
Spin Glass Theory and Beyond: An Introduction to the Replica Method and Its Applications
Mezard, M., Parisi, G., & Virasoro, M. (1986) · World Scientific Lecture Notes in Physics · doi:10.1142/0271 · Cited by 3,653 · see citing works
Feynman, R. P. (1986) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01886518 · Cited by 1,770 · see citing works
Thaller, B. (1992) · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-02753-0 · Cited by 1,530 · see citing works
Experimental issues in coherent quantum-state manipulation of trapped atomic ions
Wineland, D. J., Monroe, C., Itano, W. M., Leibfried, D., King, B. E., & Meekhof, D. M. (1998) · Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology · doi:10.6028/jres.103.019 · Cited by 1,497 · see citing works
Rosenband, T., Hume, D. B., Schmidt, P. O., Chou, C. W., Brusch, A., Lorini, L., Oskay, W. H., Drullinger, R. E., Fortier, T. M., Stalnaker, J. E., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154622 · Cited by 1,450 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Today, by using trapped ions as frequency standards unsurpassed ccuracy and precision has been reached (e.g., [Rosenband et al. 2008] and references ther in), and in addition, trapped ions are used for a wide range of investigations into fundamental questions of physics, for instance in the field…”
BackgroundObservation of collective excitation of two individual atoms in the Rydberg blockade regime
Gaëtan, A., Miroshnychenko, Y., Wilk, T., Chotia, A., Viteau, M., Comparat, D., Pillet, P., Browaeys, A., & Grangier, P. (2009) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1183 · Cited by 846 · see citing works
An introduction to entanglement measures
Plenio, M. B., & Virmani, S. (2007) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic7.1-2-1 · Cited by 756 · see citing works
Simulating a quantum magnet with trapped ions
Friedenauer, A., Schmitz, H., Glueckert, J. T., Porras, D., & Schaetz, T. (2008) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1032 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Dirac Equation and Quantum Relativistic Effects in a Single Trapped Ion
Lamata, L., León, J., Schätz, T., & Solano, E. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.253005 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Bermudez, A., Martin-Delgado, M. A., & Solano, E. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.041801 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Stahl, S., Galve, F., Alonso, J., Djekic, S., Quint, W., Valenzuela, T., Verd�, J., Vogel, M., & Werth, G. (2005) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2004-00179-x · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Simulating nonlinear spin models in an ion trapPreprint
Milburn, G. J. (1999) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9908037 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 142
- Alsing P M, Dowling J P and Milburn G J 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 220401-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Anderson M H, Ensher J R, Matthews M R, Wieman C E and Cornell E A 1995 Science 269 198-201 · DOI
- Aubry S and Le Daeron P Y 1983 Physica D 8 381-422 · DOI
- Bardeen J, Cooper L N and Schrieffer J R 1957 Phys. Rev. 108 1175 · DOI
- Barjaktarevic J P, Milburn G J and McKenzie R H 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 012335 · DOI
- Barrett M D et al 2004 Nature 429 737-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Bastin T, von Zanthier J and Solano E 2006 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 39 685-93 · DOI
- Birkl G, Kassner S and Walther H 1992 Nature 357 310-3 · DOI
- Review
- Birrell N D and Davies P C W 1984 Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
- Blatt R and Wineland D 2008 Nature 453 1008-15 · DOI
- Borgonovi F, Guarneri I and Shepelyansky D L 1989 Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 2010 · DOI
- Braun O M and Kivshar Y S 1998 Phys. Rep. 306 1-108 · DOI
- Braun O M and Kivshar Y S 2004 The Frenkel-Kontorova Model: Concepts, Methods, and Applications (Berlin: Springer)
- Braungardt S, Sen A, Sen U and Lewenstein M 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 042307-9 · DOI
- Brüser D submitted Brush S G 1967 Rev. Mod. Phys. 39 883 · DOI
- Cai J, Popescu S and Briegel H J 2008 arXiv:0809.4906 · arXiv
- Carruthers P and Nieto M M 1965 Am. J. Phys. 33 537 · DOI
- Chiaverini J and Lybarger W E 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 11 · DOI
- Ciaramicoli G, Galve F, Marzoli I and Tombesi P 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 042323 · DOI
- Ciaramicoli G, Marzoli I and Tombesi P 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 032348 · DOI
- Ciaramicoli G, Marzoli I and Tombesi P 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 012338 · DOI · Paper page
- Cirac J I, Parkins A S, Blatt R and Zoller P 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 556 · DOI
- Cirac J L and Zoller P 2000 Nature 404 579-81 · DOI
- Clark R J, Lin T, Brown K R and Chuang I L 2008 arXiv: 0809.2824v1 [quant-ph] · arXiv
- Das A and Chakrabarti B K 2005 Quantum Annealing and Related Optimization Methods (Lecture Notes in Physics) (Berlin: Springer)
- Davis K B, Mewes M O, Andrews M R, van Druten N J, Durfee D S, Kurn D M and Ketterle W 1995a Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 3969 · DOI
- Davis K B, Mewes M O, Joffe M A, Andrews M R and Ketterle W 1995b Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 5202 · DOI
- Deng X L, Porras D and Cirac J I 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 063407-11 · DOI
- Deng X L, Porras D and Cirac J I 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 033403-11 · DOI
- Deslauriers L, Olmschenk S, Stick D, Hensinger W K, Sterk J and Monroe C 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 103007 · DOI
- Diedrich F, Bergquist J C, Itano W M and Wineland D J 1989 Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 403-6 · DOI
- Drewsen M, Brodersen C, Hornekær L, Hangst J S and Schifffer J P 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 2878 · DOI
- Dubin D H E 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 2753 · DOI
- Fisher M P A, Weichman P B, Grinstein G and Fisher D S 1989 Phys. Rev. B 40 546 · DOI · Paper page
- Fisher R, Yuan H, Spoerl A and Glaser S 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 042304 · DOI
- Fishman S, Chiara G D, Calarco T and Morigi G 2008 Phys. Rev. B 77 064111 · DOI
- García-Mata I, Zhirov O V and Shepelyansky D L 2007 Eur. Phys. J. D 41 325-30 · DOI
- Ghosh P K 1995 Ion Traps (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
- Gibbons G W and Hawking S W 1977 Phys. Rev. D 15 2738-51 · DOI · Paper page
- Giorgini S, Pitaevskii L P and Stringari S 2008 Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 1215 · DOI
- Girardeau M 1960 J. Math. Phys., NY 1 516-23 · DOI
- Gitterman M and Halpern V 2004 Phase Transitions: A Brief Account with Modern Applications (Singapore: World Scientific)
- Hackermuller L, Hornberger K, Brezger B, Zeilinger A and Arndt M 2004 Nature 427 711-4 · DOI
- Häffner H et al 2005 Nature 438 643-6 · DOI
- Haljan P C, Brickman K A, Deslauriers L, Lee P J and Monroe C 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 153602 · DOI · Paper page
- Hänsch T W and Schawlow A L 1975 Opt. Commun. 13 · DOI
- Heinzen D J and Wineland D J 1990 Phys. Rev. A 42 2977 · DOI
- Heisenberg W 1928 Z. Phys. 49 619-36 · DOI
- Hensinger W K, Olmschenk S, Stick D, Hucul D, Yeo M, Acton M, Deslauriers L, Monroe C and Rabchuk J 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 034101 · DOI · Paper page
- Hofstetter W, Cirac J I, Zoller P, Demler E and Lukin M D 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 220407 · DOI
- Holland M, Kokkelmans S J J M F, Chiofalo M L and Walser R 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 120406 · DOI
- Hopfield J J 1982 Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 79 2554-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Hubbard J 1963 Proc. R. Soc. A 276 238-57 · DOI
- Huber G, Deuschle T, Schnitzler W, Reichle R, Singer K and Schmidt-Kaler F 2008 New J. Phys. 10 013004 · DOI
- Hugh D M and Twamley J 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 012315 · DOI
- Igloi F, Peschel I and Turban L C 1993 Adv. Phys. 42 683-740 · DOI
- Ising E 1925 Z. Phys. 31 253-8 · DOI · Paper page
- James D F V 1998 Appl. Phys. B 66 181-90 · DOI
- Johanning M, Braun A, Timoney N, Elman V, Neuhauser W and Wunderlich C 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 073004 · DOI
- Jonathan D and Plenio M B 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 127901 · DOI
- Jonathan D, Plenio M B and Knight P L 2000 Phys. Rev. A 62 042307 · DOI
- Kielpinski D, Monroe C and Wineland D J 2002 Nature 417 709-11 · DOI · Paper page
- Kjærgaard N and Drewsen M 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 095002 · DOI
- Labaziewicz J, Ge Y, Antohi P, Leibrandt D, Brown K R and Chuang I L 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 013001 · DOI
- Leibfried D, Meekhof D M, King B E, Monroe C, Itano W M and Wineland D J 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 4281-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Leibfried D et al 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 247901 · DOI
- Leibfried D et al 2003 Nature 422 412-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Leibfried D et al 2005 Nature 438 639-42 · DOI
- Lieb E H and Liniger W 1963 Phys. Rev. 130 1605 · DOI
- Lougovski P, Walther H and Solano E 2006 Eur. Phys. J. D 38 423-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Luttinger J M 1963 J. Math. Phys., NY 4 1154 · DOI
- Meekhof D M, Monroe C, King B E, Itano W M and Wineland D J 1996a Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 1796 · DOI · Paper page
- Meekhof D M, Monroe C, King B E, Itano W M and Wineland D J 1996b Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 2346 · DOI
- Menicucci N C and Milburn G J 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 052105-5 · DOI
- Metcalf H J and van der Straten P 2001 Laser Cooling and Trapping (Berlin: Springer) J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42 (2009) 154009
- Review
- Meyrath T P, Schreck F, Hanssen J L, Chuu C S and Raizen M G 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 041604 · DOI
- Mezard M, Parisi G and Virasoro M A 1987 Spin Glass Theory and Beyond (Singapore: World Scientific)
- Milburn G J, Schneider S and James D F V 2000 Fortschr. Phys. 48 801-10 · DOI
- Mintert F and Wunderlich C 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 257904 · DOI
- Mintert F and Wunderlich C 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 029902 · DOI
- Mitchell T B, Bollinger J J, Dubin D H E, Huang X P, Itano W M and Baughman R H 1998 Science 282 1290-3 · DOI
- Molmer K and Sorensen A 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 1835-8 · DOI
- Monroe C, Meekhof D M, King B E, Itano W M and Wineland D J 1995a Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 4714 · DOI · Paper page
- Monroe C, Meekhof D M, King B E, Jefferts S R, Itano W M, Wineland D J and Gould P 1995b Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 4011-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Monroe C, Meekhof D M, King B E and Wineland D J 1996a Science 272 1131-6 · DOI
- Morigi G and Fishman S 2004a Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 170602 · DOI
- Morigi G and Fishman S 2004b Phys. Rev. E 70 066141 · DOI
- Morsch O and Oberthaler M 2006 Rev. Mod. Phys. 78 179 · DOI
- Müller M, Liang L, Lesanovsky I and Zoller P 2008 New J. Phys. 10 093009 · DOI
- Neuhauser W, Hohenstatt M, Toschek P E and Dehmelt H 1980 Phys. Rev. A 22 1137 · DOI
- Nightingale M P and Umrigar C J 1998 Quantum Monte Carlo Methods in Physics and Chemistry (Berlin: Springer)
- Ospelkaus C, Langer C E, Amini J M, Brown K R, Leibfried D and Wineland D J 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 090502 · DOI
- Osterloh A, Amico L, Falci G and Fazio R 2002 Nature 416 608-10 · DOI · Paper page
- Paredes B, Widera A, Murg V, Mandel O, Fölling S, Cirac I, Shlyapnikov G V, Hänsch T W and Bloch I 2004 Nature 429 277-81 · DOI
- Peitgen H O, Jürgens H and Saupe D 2004 Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science 2nd edn (New York: Springer)
- Pfeuty P 1970 Ann. Phys. 57 79-90 · DOI
- Platini T, Karevski D and Turban L 2007 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 1467-79 · DOI
- Plenio M and Huelga S 2008 New J. Phys. 10 113019 · DOI · Paper page
- Pons M, Ahufinger V, Wunderlich C, Sanpera A, Braungardt S, Sen A, Sen U and Lewenstein M 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 023003 · DOI
- Porras D and Cirac J I 2004a Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 207901 · DOI · Paper page
- Porras D and Cirac J I 2004b Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 263602 · DOI
- Porras D, Marquardt F, Delft J v and Cirac J I 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 010101 · DOI
- Powell H F, Segal D M and Thompson R C 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 093003 · DOI
- Raizen M G, Gilligan J M, Bergquist J C, Itano W M and Wineland D J 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45 6493 · DOI
- Reichle R, Leibfried D, Blakestad R B, Britton J, Jost J D, Knill E, Langer C, Ozeri R, Seidelin S and Wineland D J 2006 Fortschr. Phys. 54 666-85 · DOI
- Retzker A, Thompson R C, Segal D M and Plenio M B 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 260504 · DOI
- Riebe M et al 2004 Nature 429 734-7 · DOI
- Rojas R 1996 Neural Networks-A Systematic Introduction (Berlin: Springer)
- Sachdev S 1999 Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
- Sackett C A et al 2000 Nature 404 256-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Santos M F, Giedke G and Solano E 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 020401 · DOI · Paper page
- Sasura M and Steane A M 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 19 · DOI
- Schiffer J P 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 818 · DOI
- Schmidt-Kaler F, Häffner H, Riebe M, Gulde S, Lancaster G P T, Deuschle T, Becher C, Roos C F, Eschner J and Blatt R 2003 Nature 422 408-11 · DOI · Paper page
- Schmied R, Roscilde T, Murg V, Porras D and Cirac J I 2008 New J. Phys. 10 045017 · DOI
- Schollwöck U, Richter J, Farnell D and Bishop R 2004 Quantum Magnetism (Lecture Notes in Physics vol 645) (Berlin: Springer) Schrödinger E 1935 Naturwissenschaften 23 807-12 · DOI · Paper page
- Schulz S, Poschinger U, Singer K and Schmidt-Kaler F 2006 Fortschr. Phys. 54 648-65 · DOI
- Schützhold R, Uhlmann M, Petersen L, Schmitz H, Friedenauer A and Schätz T 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 201301-4 · DOI
- Schwabl F 1997 Quantenmechanik für Fortgeschrittene (Berlin: Springer)
- Seidelin S et al 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 253003-4 · DOI
- Sørensen A and Mølmer K 2000 Phys. Rev. A 62 022311 · DOI
- Steane A 1997 Appl. Phys. B 64 623-43 · DOI
- Stenholm S 1986 Rev. Mod. Phys. 58 699 · DOI
- Stick D, Hensinger W K, Olmschenk S, Madsen M J, Schwab K and Monroe C 2006 Nat. Phys. 2 36-9 · DOI
- Tolra B L, O'Hara K M, Huckans J H, Phillips W D, Rolston S L and Porto J V 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 190401 · DOI
- Turchette Q A et al 2000 Phys. Rev. A 61 8 · DOI
- Unruh W G 1976 Phys. Rev. D 14 870-92 · DOI · Paper page
- Urban E, Johnson T A, Henage T, Isenhower L, Yavuz D D, Walker T G and Saffman M 2009 Nat. Phys. 5 110-4 · DOI
- Voit J 1995 Rep. Prog. Phys. 58 977 · DOI
- Waki I, Kassner S, Birkl G and Walther H 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 2007 · DOI
- Wallentowitz S, Vogel W, Siemers I and Toschek P E 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 943 · DOI
- Wang S X, Labaziewicz J, Ge Y, Shewmon R and Chuang I L 2008 arXiv:0811.2422v1 Weiss U 1999 Quantum Dissipative Systems (Singapore: World Scientific) · arXiv
- White S R 1993 Phys. Rev. B 48 10345 · DOI · Paper page
- Wineland D J and Itano W M 1979 Phys. Rev. A 20 1521-40 · DOI
- Wineland D J, Monroe C, Itano W M, King B E, Leibfried D, Myatt C and Wood C 1998 Phys. Scr. T 76 147 · DOI
- Wunderlich C 2002 Laser Physics at the Limit ed H Figger, D Meschede and C Zimmermann (Berlin: Springer) pp 261-71
- Wunderlich C and Balzer C 2003 Advances in Atomic Molecular, and Optical Physics vol 49 (San Diego, CA: Academic) pp 293-372
- Wunderlich C, Morigi G and Reiß D 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 023421 · DOI
- Wunderlich H, Wunderlich C, Singer K and Schmidt-Kaler 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 052324 · DOI
- Zhirov O V, Casati G and Shepelyansky D L 2002 Phys. Rev. E 65 026220 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Georgescu, I. M., Ashhab, S., & Nori, F. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.153 · Cited by 2,932 · see citing works
“Ions can be trapped by electric (or magnetic) fields, laser-cooled and manipulated with high precision for realizing quantum simulation (Blatt and Wineland, 2008; Johanning et al., 2009; Schätz et al., 2007, 2004).”
BackgroundQuantum simulations with trapped ions
Blatt, R., & Roos, C. F. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2252 · Cited by 1,629 · see citing works
Quantum simulation of the Dirac equation
Gerritsma, R., Kirchmair, G., Zähringer, F., Solano, E., Blatt, R., & Roos, C. F. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08688 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
“Trapped ions are particularly interesting for the purpose of quantum simulation [19, 20, 21], as they allow for exceptional control of experimental parameters, and initialization and read-out can be achieved with high fidelity.”
BackgroundSimulating Chemistry Using Quantum Computers
Kassal, I., Whitfield, J. D., Perdomo-Ortiz, A., Yung, M.-H., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2011) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103512 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Can one trust quantum simulators?
Hauke, P., Cucchietti, F. M., Tagliacozzo, L., Deutsch, I., & Lewenstein, M. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/8/082401 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Quantum Simulation of the Klein Paradox with Trapped Ions
Gerritsma, R., Lanyon, B. P., Kirchmair, G., Zähringer, F., Hempel, C., Casanova, J., García-Ripoll, J. J., Solano, E., Blatt, R., & Roos, C. F. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.060503 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Adiabatic Quantum Simulation of Quantum Chemistry
Babbush, R., Love, P. J., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep06603 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Zitterbewegung (trembling motion) of electrons in semiconductors: a review
Zawadzki, W., & Rusin, T. M. (2011) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/23/14/143201 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Quantum Simulation of Interacting Fermion Lattice Models in Trapped Ions
Casanova, J., Mezzacapo, A., Lamata, L., & Solano, E. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.190502 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Heralded Entanglement of Two Ions in an Optical Cavity
Casabone, B., Stute, A., Friebe, K., Brandstätter, B., Schüppert, K., Blatt, R., & Northup, T. E. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.100505 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Relativistic quantum mechanics with trapped ions
Lamata, L., Casanova, J., Gerritsma, R., Roos, C. F., García-Ripoll, J. J., & Solano, E. (2011) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/9/095003 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Classical simulation of relativistic quantum mechanics in periodic optical structures
Longhi, S. (2011) · Applied Physics B · doi:10.1007/s00340-011-4628-7 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Zitterbewegung of relativistic electrons in a magnetic field and its simulation by trapped ions
Rusin, T. M., & Zawadzki, W. (2010) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.125031 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Simulation of Zitterbewegung by modelling the Dirac equation in metamaterials
Ahrens, S., Zhu, S.-Y., Jiang, J., & Sun, Y. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/11/113021 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“[31] Michael Johanning, Andrs F Varn, and Christof Wunderlich.”
Background
- Authors
- Johanning, M., Varón, A. F., & Wunderlich, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Siegen (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2009-07-15
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 154009
- ISSN
- 0953-4075 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6455
- OpenAlex
- W2057595669
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 13.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- quantum simulation, cold trapped ions, laser cooling, spin systems, neural quantum states, Bose-Hubbard model, Frenkel-Kontorova model, quantum field theory, relativistic effects, quantum information
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review