CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 40

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tunneling wave function of the universe. II. The backreaction problem

Vilenkin, Alexander, Yamada, Masaki·2019·Physical Review D
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.99.066010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.99.066010

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Hawking-Turok instanton can be obtained as a 4D section of a non-singular instanton in 5 dimensions.

    “It has been shown in Refs.[43] and[44] that the Hawking-Turok instanton can be obtained as a 4D section of a non-singular instanton in 5 dimensions.”

    From On Quantum Creation of a Toroidal Universe (2026) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Introduction discusses the tunneling wave function, and the Summary and Discussion describes four-dimensional saddle points; neither addresses the Hawking–Turok instanton as a section of a nonsingular five-dimensional instanton. Searches for “Hawking-Turok instanton” and “non-singular instanton in 5 dimensions 4D section” found no passage establishing the claim. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. J. B. Hartle, 1987, Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol., 3, 174
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevD.33.3560 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevD.37.888 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevD.50.2581 · DOI
  5. A. D. Linde, 1984, Lett. Nuovo Cimento, 39, 401, 10.1007/BF02790571 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/0370-2693(84)90088-1 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevD.30.509 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Ya. B. Zeldovich, 1984, Sov. Astron. Lett., 10, 135
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.103508 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.171301 · DOI · Paper page
  11. J. Feldbrugge, 2018, Universe, 4, 100, 10.3390/universe4100100 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.043505 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.081302 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.066003 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevD.39.2206 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevD.37.898 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevD.41.1815 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevD.31.1777 · DOI · Paper page
  19. J. J. Halliwell, 1987, Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol., 3, 277
  20. 10.1016/0550-3213(86)90073-8 · DOI
  21. S. Wada, 1987, Nucl. Phys., B284, 747
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.023520 · DOI
  23. S. Coleman, 1985, Aspects of Symmetry, 10.1017/CBO9780511565045 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevD.42.1931 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/0370-2693(87)91488-2 · DOI
  26. N. D. Birrell, 1984, Quantum Fields in Curved Space

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vilenkin, A., & Yamada, M.
Venue
Physical Review D
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2019-03-26
Volume
99
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 2470-0010
  • 2470-0029
DOI
10.1103/physrevd.99.066010
Cited by
40
References
2
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)
Funders
National Science Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review