Cited by 744Topological Materials and PhenomenaSurface and Thin Film PhenomenaAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics

Experimental Demonstration of Topological Surface States Protected by Time-Reversal Symmetry

Open access
Zhang, Tong, Cheng, Peng, Chen, Xi, Jia, Jin-Feng, Ma, Xucun, He, Ke, Wang, Lili, Zhang, Haijun +4 more·2009·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We report direct imaging of standing waves of the nontrivial surface states of topological insulator Bi2Te3 using a scanning tunneling microscope. The interference fringes are caused by the scattering of the topological states off Ag impurities and step edges on the Bi2Te3(111) surface. By studying the voltage-dependent standing wave patterns, we determine the energy dispersion E(k), which confirms the Dirac cone structure of the topological states. We further show that, very different from the conventional surface states, backscattering of the topological states by nonmagnetic impurities is completely suppressed. The absence of backscattering is a spectacular manifestation of the time-reversal symmetry, which offers a direct proof of the topological nature of the surface states.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Direct low-temperature STM/STS imaging of Bi₂Te₃(111) reveals standing waves from topological surface states scattering off Ag trimers and step edges, confirming a Dirac cone dispersion. The absence of backscattering by nonmagnetic impurities provides a direct demonstration of time-reversal-symmetry protection.

Key findings

  • Standing waves appear around Ag trimers and step edges; FFT power spectra show high intensity along Γ–M and vanishing intensity along Γ–K. Only the scattering wave vector q₂ along Γ–M is observed, while q₁ and q₃ are invisible, consistent with forbidden backscattering between k and −k for nonmagnetic impurities due to time-reversal symmetry.
  • The measured energy dispersion in the Γ–K direction is linear, giving a Fermi velocity v_F = 4.8 × 10⁵ m/s and an estimated Dirac point energy of 0.25 eV. These agree with first-principles calculations and ARPES data, and the method probes unoccupied states inaccessible to ARPES.
  • STS on bare Bi₂Te₃ shows the Fermi level within the bulk gap and a linear dI/dV in the gap attributed to gapless surface states; the Dirac point is invisible because surface states overlap in energy with the bulk valence band. Depositing 0.01 ML Ag shifts the Fermi level upward by 20–30 meV.
  • Step-edge standing waves also propagate predominantly along Γ–M and yield the same v_F = 4.8 × 10⁵ m/s as the Ag-trimer standing waves.

Methods

  • Experiments used an ultra-high-vacuum low-temperature STM/STS system (down to 0.4 K) with MBE. A stoichiometric Bi₂Te₃ film of ∼100 nm thickness was grown on Si(111); the Te-terminated (111) surface showed steps of 0.94 nm height (one quintuple layer).
  • A small amount (0.01 ML) of Ag was deposited, forming trimers. dI/dV maps were recorded at bias voltages from 50 mV to 400 mV with 128 × 128 pixels, then Fourier transformed into q-space.
  • The scattering geometry q₂ = √3 k in the Γ–K direction was used to extract E(k); a linear fit gave v_F and the Dirac point energy. First-principles calculations were used for comparison.

Limitations

  • Stated: the exact structure of the Ag trimers is not fully determined—top-site adsorption versus substitutional Te model—though the authors state this does not affect the main conclusion and remains for further study.
  • Stated: the Dirac point is invisible in STS because the surface states around Γ overlap with the bulk valence band; below 50 meV the interference fringes become obscured due to rapidly increasing wavelength and multiple topological states. The response to magnetic impurities and time-reversal-breaking perturbations remains an open question.
  • Evident: the paper has no formal limitations section; the FFT resolution is limited to 2π/28 nm⁻¹ by the STM image size, and the backscattering suppression is demonstrated only for nonmagnetic Ag impurities and step edges, not for magnetic scatterers.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.103.266803

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 12 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § Experimental demonstration of the topological surface states protected by the time-reversal symmetry · p. 4

    Using the slope of the linear fitting and the same scattering geometry as for the Ag trimmer, the Fermi velocity from step-edge standing waves is 4.8 × 10^5 m/s, the same as that obtained from Ag impurities.

    “Using the slope of the linear fitting together with the same scattering geometry as that for the Ag trimmer, the Fermi velocity is found to be 4 . 8 × 10 5 m/s, the same as that obtained from the standing waves caused by the Ag impurities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Experimental demonstration of the topological surface states protected by the time-reversal symmetry · p. 4

    The standing waves produced by steps are predominantly propagating along the Gamma-M direction.

    “Similar to the case of Ag trimmers, the standing waves produced by steps are predominantly propagating along the ¯ Γ -¯ M direction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Experimental demonstration of the topological surface states protected by the time-reversal symmetry · p. 3

    The slope of the linear fitting provides a measurement of the Dirac fermion velocity vF = 4.8 × 10^5 m/s.

    “The slope of the linear fitting provides a measurement of the Dirac fermion velocity v F , which is 4 . 8 × 10 5 m/s.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Experimental demonstration of the topological surface states protected by the time-reversal symmetry · p. 2

    The Fermi level (zero bias) is within the energy gap of the Bi2Te3 film.

    “The Fermi level (zero bias) is within the energy gap, indicating that the film is an intrinsic bulk insulator [22].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Experimental demonstration of the topological surface states protected by the time-reversal symmetry · p. 3

    The resulting k values vary linearly with energy.

    “The resulting k values vary linearly with energy [Fig. 3(b)].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 4
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 2
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Experimental demonstration of the topological surface states protected by the time-reversal symmetry · p. 2

    The spatial period of the standing wave scales inversely with the bias voltage and is determined by the momentum transfer during scattering at a given energy.

    “The spatial period of the standing wave scales inversely with the bias voltage and is determined by the momentum transfer during scattering at a given energy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Experimental demonstration of the topological surface states protected by the time-reversal symmetry · p. 2

    Among the three possible scattering wave vectors q1, q2, and q3, only q2 is along the Gamma-M directions and can generate the observed standing waves; q1 and q3 are invisible in the power spectra.

    “Among them, however, only q ⃗ 2 is along the ¯ Γ -¯ Mdirections and can generate the observed standing waves. Both ⃗ q 1 and q ⃗ 3 are invisible in the power spectra.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Experimental demonstration of the topological surface states protected by the time-reversal symmetry · p. 2

    In the Fourier-transformed dI/dV maps, the regions with high intensity are always oriented toward the Gamma-M directions, while the intensity in the Gamma-K directions vanishes.

    “the regions with high intensity are always oriented toward the ¯ Γ -¯ M directions, while the intensity in the ¯ Γ -¯ K directions vanishes”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Experimental demonstration of the topological surface states protected by the time-reversal symmetry · p. 4

    The fringes at step edges are clearly visible even at negative bias voltages, probably owing to the stronger scattering potential compared to that of the Ag trimmers.

    “The fringes are clearly visible even at the negative bias voltages probably owing to the stronger scattering potential compared to that of the Ag trimmers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Experimental demonstration of the topological surface states protected by the time-reversal symmetry · p. 4

    A time-reversal breaking perturbation, such as magnetic impurities, can induce scattering between the states |k↑> and -|k↓> and open up a local energy gap at the Dirac point.

    “Theoretically, it was pointed out [5, 30, 31] that a time-reversal breaking perturbation, such as magnetic impurities, can induce scattering between the states | ⃗ k ↑〉 and -| ⃗ k ↓〉 and open up a local energy gap at the Dirac point.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [5] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [30] Q. Liu, C.-X. Liu, C. Xu, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 , 156603 (2009).

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [31]

      Not checked in the free run.

5 of 5
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Ag impurities used in the experiment are nonmagnetic.

    “the backscattering of the topological states by nonmagnetic impurities is completely suppressed”
    “where U is a time-reversal invariant operator and represents the impurity potential of the nonmagnetic Ag impurity.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The scattering of surface states by defects is elastic.

    “During elastic scattering, a defect scatters the incident wave with a wave vector ⃗ k i into ⃗ k f = ⃗ k i + q ⃗ , with ⃗ k i and ⃗ k f being on the same constant-energy contour (CEC).”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The same conclusion has emerged from studies of the electronic interference patterns near defects or steps on the surface that electrons never turn completely around when scattered in other topological insulators.

    “The same conclusion has emerged from studies of the electronic interference patterns near defects or steps on the surface that electrons never turn completely around when scattered in other topological insulators (25,26)).”

    From Three-Dimensional Topological Insulators (2011) · cites this paper as [25]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Inconsistent panel range for the Fourier spectra in Figure 2

    Minor

    The main text identifies the Fourier spectra as panels 2(h) through 2(l), but the caption identifies them as 2(h) through 2(k). The caption's range also has four panels for the five dI/dV maps in 2(c) through 2(g).

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, T., Cheng, P., Chen, X., Jia, J.-F., Ma, X., He, K., Wang, L., Zhang, H., Dai, X., Fang, Z., Xie, X., & Xue, Q.-K.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2009-12-23
Volume
103
Issue
26
Pages
266803-266803
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2088225002
Cited by
744
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 72
FWCI
30.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Surface and Thin Film Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
Keywords
topological insulators, Bi2Te3, topological surface states, time-reversal symmetry, Dirac cones, standing waves, surface steps, energy dispersion, scanning tunneling microscopy imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review