Cited by 23Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The volume operator in covariant quantum gravity

Open access
Ding, You, Rovelli, Carlo·2010·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

A covariant spin-foam formulation of quantum gravity has been recently developed, characterized by a kinematics which appears to match well the one of canonical loop quantum gravity. In particular, the geometrical observable giving the area of a surface has been shown to be the same as the one in loop quantum gravity. Here we discuss the volume observable. We derive the volume operator in the covariant theory, and show that it matches the one of loop quantum gravity, as does the area. We also reconsider the implementation of the constraints that defines the model: we derive in a simple way the boundary Hilbert space of the theory from a suitable form of the classical constraints, and show directly that all constraints vanish weakly on this space.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/27/16/165003

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Riemannian Gupta-Bleuler approach with γ < 1, restricting Spin(4) representations to the maximum-weight component j = j+ + j− satisfies the relevant condition.

    “Case γ < 1: Following [142], in this case one restricts the Spin(4) representations to 130 which amounts to choosing the maximum weight component j = j+ + j− in the expansion (182). Simple algebra shows that condition (188) is met.”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [142]

  • Geometric operators such as volume and area defined in the covariant context coincide with the corresponding operators in the canonical formulation.

    “Moreover, geometric operators such as volume and area defined in the covariant context are shown to coincide with the corresponding operators defined in the canonical formulation [141, 142].”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [142]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [10][10] C Rovelli, 'A new look at loop quantum gravity,' arXiv:1004.1780 [gr-qc]. - · arXiv
  2. [13][13] MV Battisti, A Marciano and C Rovelli, 'Triangulated Loop Quantum Cosmology: Bianchi IX and inhomogenous perturbations', arXiv:0911.2653 [gr-qc]. C Rovelli, F Vidotto, ' On the spinfoam expansion in cosmology', arXiv:0911.3097 [gr-qc]. E Bianchi, C Rovelli and F Vidotto, ' Towards Spinfoam Cosmology', arXiv:1003.3483 [gr-qc]. - · arXiv
  3. [17][17] R Pereira, 'Lorentzian LQG vertex amplitude' , Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 085013; arXiv:0710.5043 [gr-qc]. - · arXiv
  4. [24][24] C Flori, T Thiemann, 'Semiclassical analysis of the Loop Quantum Gravity volume operator: I. Flux Coherent States', arXiv:0812.1537 [gr-qc]. C. Flori, 'Semiclassical analysis of the Loop Quantum Gravity volume operator: Area Coherent States', arXiv:0904.1303 [gr-qc]. - · arXiv
  5. [27][27] S Alexandrov, 'The new vertices and canonical quantization,' arXiv:1004.2260 [gr-qc]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ding, Y., & Rovelli, C.
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2010-06-29
Volume
27
Issue
16
Pages
165003
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2156604430
Cited by
23
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL AMU (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
spin foam models, volume operator, loop quantum gravity, area operator, constraints, soft constraints, kinematics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review