Cited by 69Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

Protein structure prediction by AlphaFold 2: are attention and symmetries all you need?

Open access
Bouatta, Nazim, Sorger, Peter, AlQuraishi, Mohammed·2021·Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology

Abstract

The functions of most proteins result from their 3D structures, but determining their structures experimentally remains a challenge, despite steady advances in crystallography, NMR and single-particle cryoEM. Computationally predicting the structure of a protein from its primary sequence has long been a grand challenge in bioinformatics, intimately connected with understanding protein chemistry and dynamics. Recent advances in deep learning, combined with the availability of genomic data for inferring co-evolutionary patterns, provide a new approach to protein structure prediction that is complementary to longstanding physics-based approaches. The outstanding performance of AlphaFold2 in the recent Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction (CASP14) experiment demonstrates the remarkable power of deep learning in structure prediction. In this perspective, we focus on the key features of AlphaFold2, including its use of (i) attention mechanisms and Transformers to capture long-range dependencies, (ii) symmetry principles to facilitate reasoning over protein structures in three dimensions and (iii) end-to-end differentiability as a unifying framework for learning from protein data. The rules of protein folding are ultimately encoded in the physical principles that underpin it; to conclude, the implications of having a powerful computational model for structure prediction that does not explicitly rely on those principles are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1107/s2059798321007531

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Aspect, A. (2016). Niels Bohr, 1913–2013, edited by O. Darrigol, B. Duplantier, J.-M. Raimond & V. Rivasseau, pp. 147–175. Cham: Birkhäuser.
  2. Bell, J. S. (2004). Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.
  3. Bronstein, M. M., Bruna, J., Cohen, T. & Veličković, P. (2021). arXiv:2104.13478. · arXiv
  4. Cohen, T. S., Geiger, M. & Weiler, M. (2019). Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 32, 9142–9153.
  5. Cohen, T. S. & Welling, M. (2016). Proc. Mach. Learning Res. 48, 2990–2999.
  6. Crowther, R. A. (1972). The Molecular Replacement Method, edited by M. G. Rossmann, pp. 173–178. New York: Gordon & Breach.
  7. Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B. & Sands, M. (1964). The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
  8. Fuchs, F. B., Wagstaff, E., Dauparas, J. & Posner, I. (2021). arXiv:2102.13419. · arXiv
  9. Gross, D. J. (1996). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 14256–14259.
  10. Grossman, J. P., Towles, B., Greskamp, B. & Shaw, D. E. (2015). 2015 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, pp. 860–870. Piscataway: IEEE.
  11. Hawking, S. & Penrose, R. (2010). The Nature of Space and Time. Princeton University Press.
  12. Herik, H. J. van den, Ciancarini, P. & Donkers, H. H. L. M. (2007). Computers and Games. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
  13. Ingraham, J., Garg, V. K., Barzilay, R. & Jaakkola, T. (2019). Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 32, 15820–15831.
  14. Ingraham, J., Riesselman, A., Sander, C. & Marks, D. (2019). 7th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2019.
  15. McCoy, A. J., Sammito, M. D. & Read, R. J. (2021). bioRxiv, 2021.05.18.444614.
  16. Monod, J. (1978). Selected Papers in Molecular Biology by Jacques Monod, pp. 701–713. New York: Academic Press.
  17. Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press.
  18. Rao, R., Liu, J., Verkuil, R., Meier, J., Canny, J. F., Abbeel, P., Sercu, T. & Rives, A. (2021). bioRxiv, 2021.02.12.430858.
  19. Rao, R., Meier, J., Sercu, T., Ovchinnikov, S. & Rives, A. (2020). bioRxiv, 2020.12.15.422761.
  20. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł. & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 31, 5999–6009.
  21. Weiler, M., Geiger, M., Welling, M., Boomsma, W. & Cohen, T. (2018). Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 32, 10381–10392.
  22. Worrall, D. E., Garbin, S. J., Turmukhambetov, D. & Brostow, G. J. (2017). 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 7168–7177. Piscataway: IEEE.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bouatta, N., Sorger, P., & AlQuraishi, M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Bouatta, Nazim
  • Sorger, Peter
  • AlQuraishi, Mohammed
Venue
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
Published
2021-07-29
Volume
77
Issue
8
Pages
982-991
ISSN
2059-7983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3187563093
Cited by
69
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 6
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR0011-19-2-0022)
  • National Cancer Institute (U54-CA225088)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
AlphaFold2, protein structure prediction, attention mechanism, transformer models, protein symmetry, long-range dependencies, protein folding, deep learning, CASP14
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Humans, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Computational Biology, Caspases, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review