The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Service, services and products: rethinking operations strategy
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: This paper proposes a new approach to operations and supply strategy in the light of recent developments in the analysis of the respective roles of products and services in delivering benefits to customers. Design/methodology/approach: Reviews and synthesises concepts from operations management (OM), marketing, economics and related areas. Examples of product and service combinations are considered, drawing attention to the ways in which services may be distinguished from products. An institutional basis for defining services is favoured over IHIP. A corollary of this is how services are made tradable: the modularity theory of the firm is used to do this. The paper then outlines, considers and compares various approaches to the combination of products and services: “service‐dominant logic”, support services, product‐service systems, systems integration, performance‐based logistics, bundling and, finally, the notion of “the offering”. Findings: It is found that the notion of the business model is useful as an integrating concept. This focuses on four areas: network structure, how transactions are made, how revenue models and incentives interact and how capabilities are accessed. Implications for future research in OM are considered. Research limitations/implications: Hitherto, operations strategy (OS) has concentrated on intra‐firm capabilities, which is only part of one of the four areas identified. Therefore, an extensive agenda for research into inter‐firm capabilities and the other three areas identified is presented. Originality/value: This is among the first papers in OM to break completely with IHIP as a basis for service definition and to work through the implications for OS. It is also the first to develop systematically an understanding of how the emerging concept of the business model can inform OM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016
Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 · Cited by 14,779
Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6 · Cited by 7,824
Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud
Darby, M. R., & Karni, E. (1973) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466756 · Cited by 3,947 · cited 2×
“…by an expert and provision of the “cure” are combined, under certain regimes of payment and reward, there may be strong incentives for the supplier to behave fraudulently, i.e. carry out (or pretend to carry out) and charge for unnecessary “repair” services (Darby and Karni, 1973; Emons, 1997).”
BackgroundThe fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance
Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2008) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.642 · Cited by 1,731
Coase's penguin, or, linux and “the nature of the firm”
Benkler, Y. (2002) · The Yale Law Journal · doi:10.2307/1562247 · Cited by 1,572
Performance Contracting in After-Sales Service Supply Chains
Kim, S.-H., Cohen, M. A., & Netessine, S. (2007) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1070.0741 · Cited by 520
Cited by
A solution business model: Capabilities and management practices for integrated solutions
Storbacka, K. (2011) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.05.003 · Cited by 466
Ahmad, A., Fareed, M., Isa, M. F. M., & Salleh, S. S. M. M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.756255 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Spring, M., & Araujo, L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2009-04-24
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 444-467
- ISSN
- 0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996331420
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 66.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Service, services and products: rethinking operations strategy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/01443570910953586
- The paper
- Spring, M., & Araujo, L. (2009). Service, services and products: rethinking operations strategy. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570910953586
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.