Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consumer‐oriented CSR communication: focusing on ability or morality?

Schmeltz, Line·2012·Corporate Communications: An International Journal

Abstract

Purpose: This article aims to investigate young people's opinions and attitudes towards companies' engagement and communication about corporate social responsibility (CSR). Design/methodology/approach: The study employs a survey designed to uncover the underlying attitudes and values guiding young consumers' perception and evaluation of companies' engagement in and communication about CSR. The respondents are Danish students enrolled in eight different types of further or higher education. Findings: The survey shows that consumers are interested in and expect more explicit CSR communication than currently assumed by corporations and academics alike. They favour communication that is personally relevant and factually based, and consumer scepticism is not as high as suggested by current literature. The findings reflect that the value system guiding CSR evaluation and perception is not based on moral aspects and social, society‐centred values. On the contrary, consumers' focus tends to be on competence and personal, self‐centred values, which has implications for the challenge of communicating CSR. Practical implications: The findings provide new insights that can inform corporations in their planning and execution of CSR communication aimed at young consumers. Originality/value: This paper provides empirical evidence that corporations communicating CSR should have a much more externally oriented and explicit approach focusing on competence and self‐centred values instead of on morality and society‐centred values. This will allow them to create a healthy balance between what they can offer and what consumers demand.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/13563281211196344

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Becker‐Olsen, K.L., Cudmore, B.A. and Hill, R.P. (2006), “The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 59 No. 1, pp. 46‐53. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Beckmann, S.C. (2006), “Consumers' perceptions of and responses to CSR: so little is known so far”, in Morsing, M. and Beckmann, S. (Eds), Strategic CSR Communication, DJØF Publishing, Copenhagen, pp. 163‐78.
  3. Beckmann, S.C. (2007), “Consumers and corporate social responsibility: matching the unmatchable?”, Australasian Marketing Journal, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 27‐36. · DOI
  4. Berens, G. and van Rekom, J. (2008), “How specific should corporate communication be? The role of advertising language in establishing a corporate reputation for CSR”, in Melewar, T.C. (Ed.), 2008: Facets of Corporate Identity, Communication and Reputation, Routledge, New York, NY, pp. 96‐121. · DOI
  5. Bhattacharya, C.B. and Sen, S. (2003), “Consumer‐company identification: a framework for understanding consumers' relationships with companies”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 67, April, pp. 76‐88. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bhattacharya, C.B. and Sen, S. (2004), “Doing better at doing good: when, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives”, California Management Review, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 9‐24. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bhattacharya, C.B., Korschun, D. and Sen, S. (2008), “Strengthening stakeholder‐company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 85, pp. 257‐72. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Carrasco, I. (2007), “Corporate social responsibility, values and cooperation”, International Advances in Economic Research, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 454‐60. · DOI
  9. Carrigan, M. and Attalla, A. (2001), “The myth of the ethical consumer – do ethics matter in purchase behaviour?”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 18 No. 7, pp. 560‐77. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Carroll, A. (1991), “The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders”, Business Horizons, July‐August, pp. 39‐48. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cornelissen, J. (2005), Corporate Communications – Theory and Practice, Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA.
  12. Creyer, E.H. and Ross, W.T. Jr (1997), “The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: do consumers really care about business ethics?”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 14 No. 6, pp. 421‐32. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Dawkins, J. and Lewis, S. (2003), “CSR in stakeholder expectations: and their implication for company strategy”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 44 Nos 2/3, pp. 185‐93. · DOI · Paper page
  14. de Vaus, D. (2002), Surveys in Social Research, 5th ed., Routledge, London. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C.B. and Sen, S. (2007), “Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: the role of competitive positioning”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 224‐41. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Ellis, T. (2010), The New Pioneers. Sustainable Business Success through Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship, Wiley, Chichester.
  17. Freeman, R.E. (1984), Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  18. Green, T. and Peloza, J. (2011), “How does corporate social responsibility create value for consumers?”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 48‐56. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Gruen, T.W. (2005), “Integrated marketing communications and the emerging role of the web site”, in Kimmel, A. (Ed.), 2005: Marketing Communication. New Approaches, Technologies and Styles, Oxford University Press, Cary, NC, pp. 175‐92.
  20. Hatch, M.J. and Schultz, M. (2008), Taking Brand Initiative, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
  21. Kotler, P. and Lee, N. (2005), Corporate Social Responsibility. Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
  22. Maignan, I. (2001), “Consumers' perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: a cross‐cultural comparison”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 57‐72. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Maon, F., Lindgreen, A. and Swaen, V. (2009), “Designing and implementing corporate social responsibility: an integrative framework grounded in theory and practice”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 87 No. 1, pp. 71‐89. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Mohr, L.A., Webb, D.J. and Harris, K.E. (2001), “Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behaviour”, The Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 45‐71. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Morsing, M. (2005), “Communicating responsibility”, Business Strategy Review, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 84‐8.
  26. Morsing, M. and Schultz, M. (2006), “Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies”, Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 323‐38. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Morsing, M., Schultz, M. and Nielsen, K.U. (2008), “The Catch 22 of communicating CSR: findings from a Danish study”, Journal of Marketing Communications, Vol. 14 No. 2, April 2009, pp. 97‐111. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Muruganantham, G. (2010), “Case study on corporate social responsibility of MNC's in India”, paper submitted for the International Trade & Academic Research Conference (ITARC), London.
  29. Olsen, H. (2004), “De plukkes ikke som blomster på en mark […] Tendenser i kvantitativ metode‐litteratur vedr. konstruktion og kvalitetssikring af surveydata”, Dansk Sociologi, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 65‐95. · DOI
  30. Paine, L.S. (2003), Value Shift. Why Companies Must Merge Social and Financial Imperatives to Achieve Superior Performance, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.
  31. Podnar, K. (2008), “Communicating corporate social responsibility”, Journal of Marketing Communications, Vol. 14 No. 2, April, pp. 75‐81. · DOI · Paper page
  32. Podnar, K. and Golob, U. (2007), “CSR expectations: the focus of corporate marketing”, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 326‐40. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Pomering, A. and Johnson, L.W. (2009), “Advertising corporate social responsibility initiatives to communicate corporate image. Inhibiting skepticism to enhance persuasion”, Corporate Communications: An International Journal., Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 420‐39. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Ramasamy, B. and Yeung, M. (2008), “Chinese consumers' perception of corporate social responsibility”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 88 No. 1, pp. 119‐32. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Rokeach, M. (1973), The Nature of Human Values, The Free Press, New York, NY.
  36. Schultz, M., Antorini, Y.M. and Csaba, F.F. (2005), Corporate Branding. Purpose/people/process, Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen.
  37. Twenge, J.M. (2006), Generation Me: Why Today's Young Americans Are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled – and More Miserable than Ever Before, Free Press, New York, NY.
  38. Vogel, D. (2006), Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility, rev ed., Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.

Cited by

See all 219

Metadata

Authors
Schmeltz, L.
Venue
Corporate Communications: An International Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2012-01-27
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
29-49
ISSN
1356-3289 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009363421
Cited by
219
References
6
FWCI
35.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumer‐oriented CSR communication: focusing on ability or morality? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13563281211196344
The paper
Schmeltz, L. (2012). Consumer‐oriented CSR communication: focusing on ability or morality? Corporate Communications: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281211196344

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.