Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 502

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of online learning on communication between instructors and students during Covid-19 pandemic

Open access
Alawamleh, Mohammad, Al-Twait, Lana Mohannad, Al-Saht, Gharam Raafat·2022·Asian Education and Development Studies
DOI 10.1108/aeds-06-2020-0131
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to explore whether online learning has an effect on communication between instructors and students in a negative way, whether online learning affects students' productivity levels and to evaluate and suggest ways of improving effective online communication between instructors and students. Design/methodology/approach: This study used is a quantitative research study which was conducted through a semi-structured online survey through a random sample technique. Findings: Results revealed that the vast majority agree with the questions of the study. Students still prefer classroom classes over online classes due to many problems they face when taking online classes, such as lack of motivation, understanding of the material, decrease in communication levels between the students and their instructors and their feeling of isolation caused by online classes. Research limitations/implications: This research studied the impact from students' perspective only as the sample was selected only from students. Originality/value: This research reached the students’ point of view in a broader way which will help understanding the issues and provide effective solutions. This research suggested that instructors must communicate with their students and vice versa in more informal channels (instant messages online chat groups, audio calls, private video calls …) in parallel with the formal channels (online platforms, email …). Finally, instructors should encourage students to participate and study more by providing different kind of incentives.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/aeds-06-2020-0131

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 2020, COVID-19 and higher education economics, Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 21, 1
  2. 2007, Self-regulated learning in online education: a review of the empirical literature, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 4, 3
  3. 2007, Barriers and the organization's capabilities for distance education, Distance Learning, 4, 1
  4. 2015, Ten ways to overcome barriers to student engagement online, Online Learning Consortium
  5. 2010, Missing Pieces: 7 Ways to Improve Employee Well-Being and Organizational Effectiveness
  6. 2009, Getting Students More Learning Time Online: Distance Education in Support of Expanded Learning Time in K-12 Schools, 1
  7. 2005, Online Learning: Concepts, Strategies, and Application, 68
  8. 2005, Higher Education, Blended Learning, and the Generations: Knowledge Is Power-No moreElements of Quality Online Education, 88
  9. 2013, Teaching beyond the classroom walls: the pros and cons of cyber learning, Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 13, 1
  10. 2002, Introduction to hybrid courses, Teaching With Technology Today, 8, 1
  11. 2016, Motivational strategies and teachers' productivity: lessons of experience from public secondary schools in Kisii county, Kenya, IOSR Journal of Research and Method in Education, 6, 33
  12. 2012, Communication climate: its relation to institutional productivity, Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1, 196
  13. 2006, Nonverbal Communication in Close Relationships
  14. 1998, Organizational Behavior
  15. 2013, Effective communication and creating professional learning communities is a valuable practice for superintendents, Contemporary Issues In Education Research, 6, 353, 10.19030/cier.v6i4.8102 · doi:10.19030/cier.v6i4.8102
  16. 2010, Attitudes toward communication skills among students'-teachers' in Jordanian public universities, Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 1
  17. Jennings, J.M. and Angelo, T.A. (Eds) (2006), Student Engagement: Measuring and Enhancing Engagement with Learning: Proceedings of a Symposium Held on Monday and Tuesday 27 and 28 March 2006 at the Frederic Wallis House Conference Centre, New Zealand Universities Academic Audit Unit, Lower Hutt.
  18. 2015, Does digital scholarship through online lectures affect student learning?, Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 18, 129
  19. 2008, The impact of instructor and student interaction in internetbased courses, Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems, 22, 6
  20. 2010, Communication: the process, barriers, and improving effectiveness, Schooling, 1, 1
  21. 2010, Destructive Organizational Communication: Processes, Consequences, and Constructive Ways of Organizing
  22. 2008, The link between leadership style, communicator competence, and employee satisfaction, The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 45, 61, 10.1177/0021943607309351 · doi:10.1177/0021943607309351
  23. 2010, Communication skills and work motivation amongst expert teachers, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 565, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.075 · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.075
  24. 2011, Assessing course student engagement, Promoting Student Engagement, 1, 277
  25. 2006, E-learning Groups and Communities
  26. 2007, Classroom Teaching Skills
  27. 2019, Designing Effective Instructio
  28. 2001, Online Learning and Teaching with Technology: Case Studies, Experience and Practice
  29. 2015, The effectiveness of online learning: beyond no significant difference and future horizons, Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11, 309
  30. Okello, P.G. (2015), The Effect of Human Resource Practices on Students' Performance at St. John Bosco Core Primary Teachers, Uganda Management Institute, College Nyondo, Uganda, Doctoral dissertation.
  31. 2013, Basic education in Kenya: focus on strategies applied to cope with school-based challenges inhibiting effective implementation of curriculum, International Journal of Education and Research, 1, 1
  32. 2008, Cognition and Instruction, 278
  33. 1999, Work Performance as Influenced by Communication Climate, Empowerment and Value Focus Among University Personnel
  34. 2008, Effective eLearning design, MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4, 526
  35. 2007, A Grounded Meta-Analysis of Adult Learner Motivation in Online Learning from the Perspective of the Learner
  36. 2010, Quality Management: Creating and Sustaining Organizational Effectiveness
  37. 2014, Recent Advances in Financial Planning and Product Development, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Finance, Accounting and Law (ICFA ’14), 117
  38. 2008, Creating shared leadership that works, School Administrator, 65, 38

Cited by

See all 502

Metadata

Authors
Alawamleh, M., Al-Twait, L. M., & Al-Saht, G. R.
Venue
Asian Education and Development Studies
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2020-08-24
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
380-400
ISSN
2046-3162 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/aeds-06-2020-0131
OpenAlex
W3080085783
Cited by
502
References
58
FWCI
149.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of online learning on communication between instructors and students during Covid-19 pandemic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/aeds-06-2020-0131
The paper
Alawamleh, M., Al-Twait, L. M., & Al-Saht, G. R. (2022). The effect of online learning on communication between instructors and students during Covid-19 pandemic. Asian Education and Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeds-06-2020-0131

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.