The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Work engagement, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: A comparison between supervisors and line-level employees
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the influence of employee positions (supervisor vs line-level employee) on work-related variables (e.g. work engagement, job satisfaction and turnover intentions). Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected from line-level employees and supervisors of 29 mid- to up-scale hotels. A series of one-way ANCOVA were performed to test the position differences in work engagement, job satisfaction and turnover intentions. Hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to examine the moderating role of employees’ positions on the relationships between those variables. Findings: Supervisors have significantly higher work engagement and lower turnover intentions than line-level employees, whereas job satisfaction does not differ across positions. Employee positions significantly moderate the relationship between absorption and job satisfaction, and the relationship between dedication and turnover intentions. Practical implications: This study provides an in-depth analysis for hotel managers to capture work-related factors (i.e. work engagement, job satisfaction and turnover intentions) across employee positions. Dedication is the primary barometer that significantly leads to job satisfaction and reduced turnover intentions compared to vigor and absorption. Although job satisfaction may be boosted by improving employee work engagement (i.e. vigor, dedication and absorption), increasing absorption is not an effective solution to increase supervisors’ job satisfaction. Hotel managers need to carefully monitor supervisors’ levels of dedication, given its focal impact on turnover intentions. Originality/value: This study is one of the first attempts to examine the differences between line-level employees’ and supervisors’ work engagement (i.e. vigor, dedication and absorption) and its consequences (i.e. job satisfaction and turnover intentions). Findings highlight the unique influence of the individual dimension of work engagement on job satisfaction and turnover intentions. This study reveals the moderating effect of employee positions on the links between engagement dimensions and consequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OF PERSONAL ENGAGEMENT AND DISENGAGEMENT AT WORK.
Kahn, W. A. (1990) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256287 · Cited by 10,975
The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1023/a:1015630930326 · Cited by 10,014
Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi‐sample study
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.248 · Cited by 9,297
Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement
Saks, A. M. (2006) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940610690169 · Cited by 5,577
Job Engagement: Antecedents and Effects on Job Performance
Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.51468988 · Cited by 3,833
Locke, E. A. (1969) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(69)90013-0 · Cited by 2,767
Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiró, J. M. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1217 · Cited by 2,276
The Management of Customer-Contact Service Employees: An Empirical Investigation
Hartline, M. D., & Ferrell, O. C. (1996) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299606000406 · Cited by 1,920
Flow. The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York (HarperPerennial) 1990.
Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1990) · Cited by 1,864
Cited by
Jung, H. S., Jung, Y. S., & Yoon, H. H. (2021) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102703 · Cited by 412
Suhartanto, D., Dean, D., Nansuri, R., & Triyuni, N. N. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.039 · Cited by 79
Liu, J., Cho, S., & Putra, E. D. (2017) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-10-2015-0539 · Cited by 77
Strategic consumer behavior in online hotel booking
Masiero, L., Viglia, G., & Nieto-Garcia, M. (2020) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2020.102947 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, L., Lu, A. C. C., Gursoy, D., & Neale, N. R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2016-04-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 737-761
- ISSN
- 0959-6119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2336576382
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 44.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Work engagement, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: A comparison between supervisors and line-level employees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/ijchm-07-2014-0360
- The paper
- Lu, L., Lu, A. C. C., Gursoy, D., & Neale, N. R. (2016). Work engagement, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: A comparison between supervisors and line-level employees. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-07-2014-0360
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.