The DOI matches its Crossref record; 154 of the 154 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of artificial intelligence based risk assessment methods for capturing complexity-risk interdependencies: Cost overrun in construction projects
Abstract
Purpose In the past decades, artificial intelligence (AI)-based hybrid methods have been increasingly applied in construction risk management practices. The purpose of this paper is to review and compile the current AI methods used for cost-risk assessment in the construction management domain in order to capture complexity and risk interdependencies under high uncertainty. Design/methodology/approach This paper makes a content analysis, based on a comprehensive literature review of articles published in high-quality journals from the years 2008 to 2018. Fuzzy hybrid methods, such as fuzzy-analytical network processing, fuzzy-artificial neural network and fuzzy-simulation, have been widely used and dominated in the literature due to their ability to measure the complexity and uncertainty of the system. Findings The findings of this review article suggest that due to the limitation of subjective risk data and complex computation, the applications of these AI methods are limited in order to address cost overrun issues under high uncertainty. It is suggested that a hybrid approach of fuzzy logic and extended form of Bayesian belief network (BBN) can be applied in cost-risk assessment to better capture complexity-risk interdependencies under uncertainty. Research limitations/implications This study only focuses on the subjective risk assessment methods applied in construction management to overcome cost overrun problem. Therefore, future research can be extended to interpret the input data required to deal with uncertainties, rather than relying solely on subjective judgments in risk assessment analysis. Practical implications These results may assist in the management of cost overrun while addressing complexity and uncertainty to avoid chaos in a project. In addition, project managers, experts and practitioners should address the interrelationship between key complexity and risk factors in order to plan risk impact on project cost. The proposed hybrid method of fuzzy logic and BBN can better support the management implications in recent construction risk management practice. Originality/value This study addresses the applications of AI-based methods in complex construction projects. A proposed hybrid approach could better address the complexity-risk interdependencies which increase cost uncertainty in project.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One of the limitations of SEM is that it does not assume the uncertainty and stochastic behavior of events [34]; therefore, it has limited applications for complex projects under high uncertainty [1].”
From Cost Overrun Risk Assessment and Prediction in Construction Projects: A Bayesian Network Classifier Approach (2022) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cites
Application of the AHP in project management
Al‐Harbi, K. M. A. (2001) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(99)00038-1 · Cited by 1,141
Overview on Bayesian networks applications for dependability, risk analysis and maintenance areas
Weber, P., Medina-Oliva, G., Simon, C., & Iung, B. (2010) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2010.06.002 · Cited by 769
Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction
Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Ameyaw, E. E., Owusu, E. K., Parn, E. A., & Edwards, D. J. (2018) · International Journal of Construction Management · doi:10.1080/15623599.2018.1452098 · Cited by 732
What Causes Cost Overrun in Transport Infrastructure Projects?
Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M. S., & Buhl, S. L. (2004) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/0144164032000080494a · Cited by 649
Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies
Taylan, O., Bafail, A. O., Abdulaal, R. M. S., & Kabli, M. R. (2014) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2014.01.003 · Cited by 579
Criteria in AHP: A Systematic Review of Literature
Russo, R. D. F. S. M., & Camanho, R. (2015) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.081 · Cited by 536
A review of application of multi-criteria decision making methods in construction
Jato‐Espino, D., López, E. C., Rodríguez-Hernández, J., & Canteras-Jordana, J. C. (2014) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.013 · Cited by 512
Quantitative risk analysis of offshore drilling operations: A Bayesian approach
Khakzad, N., Khan, F. I., & Amyotte, P. R. (2013) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.022 · Cited by 403
Towards a better modelling and assessment of construction risk: Insights from a literature review
Taroun, A. (2014) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.03.004 · Cited by 387
Using fuzzy risk assessment to rate cost overrun risk in international construction projects
Dikmen, İ., Birgönül, M. T., & Han, S. (2007) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.12.002 · Cited by 376
Vidal, L., Marle, F., & Bocquet, J. (2010) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.016 · Cited by 357
Assessing risk and uncertainty inherent in Chinese highway projects using AHP
Zayed, T. M., Amer, M., & Pan, J. (2007) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.05.012 · Cited by 322
Managing global megaprojects: Complexity and risk management
Kardes, I., Ozturk, A., Cavusgil, S. T., & Çavuşgil, E. (2013) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.01.003 · Cited by 309
Qazi, A. J., Quigley, J. M., Dickson, A., & Kirytopoulos, K. A. (2016) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.008 · Cited by 295
A Simulation-Based Process Model for Managing Complex Design Projects
Cho, S.-H., & Eppinger, S. D. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2005.850722 · Cited by 293
ICRAM-1: Model for International Construction Risk Assessment
Hastak, M., & Shaked, A. (2000) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)0742-597x(2000)16:1(59 · Cited by 289
A simulation-based risk network model for decision support in project risk management
Fang, C., & Marle, F. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.021 · Cited by 268
Measuring Uncertainty Importance: Investigation and Comparison of Alternative Approaches
Borgonovo, E. (2006) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00806.x · Cited by 257
Fault and Event Tree Analyses for Process Systems Risk Analysis: Uncertainty Handling Formulations
Ferdous, R., Khan, F. I., Sadiq, R., Amyotte, P. R., & Veitch, B. J. (2010) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01475.x · Cited by 252
Construction risk assessment by linguistics
Kangari, R., & Riggs, L. S. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/17.18829 · Cited by 247
He, Q., Luo, L., Hu, Y., & Chan, A. P. C. (2014) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.07.009 · Cited by 244
Risk assessment model selection in construction industry
Azari, A. K., Mousavi, N., Mousavi, S. F., & Hosseini, S. B. (2010) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.110 · Cited by 232
Eybpoosh, M., Dikmen, I., & Talat Birgonul, M. (2011) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000382 · Cited by 217
Fuzzy Monte Carlo Simulation and Risk Assessment in Construction
Sadeghi, N., Fayek, A. R., & Witold Pedrycz, C. (2009) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00632.x · Cited by 216
Risk paths in international construction projects: Case study from Chinese contractors
Liu, J., Zhao, X., & Yan, P. (2016) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001116 · Cited by 203
Identification and assessment of risk factors affecting construction projects
El-Karim, M. S. B. A. A., Nawawy, O. A. M. E., & Abdelalim, A. M. (2015) · HBRC Journal · doi:10.1016/j.hbrcj.2015.05.001 · Cited by 201
Kuo, Y.-C., & Lu, S.-T. (2012) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.10.003 · Cited by 200
Network theory-based analysis of risk interactions in large engineering projects
Fang, C., Marle, F., Zio, E., & Bocquet, J. (2012) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.005 · Cited by 194
Complexity, uncertainty-reduction strategies, and project performance
Floricel, S., Michela, J. L., & Piperca, S. (2016) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.11.007 · Cited by 194
Analysing the organizational factors of project complexity using structural equation modelling
Qureshi, S. M., & Kang, C. (2014) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.04.006 · Cited by 189
Zhang, L., Wu, X., Qin, Y., Skibniewski, M. J., & Liu, W. (2015) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12448 · Cited by 188
Fuzzy AHP-Based Risk Assessment Methodology for PPP Projects
Li, J., & Zou, P. X. W. (2011) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000362 · Cited by 186
Overview of the Application of “Fuzzy Techniques” in Construction Management Research
Chan, A. P. C., Chan, D. W. M., & Yeung, J. F. Y. (2009) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000099 · Cited by 179
Different cost performance: different determinants?
Cantarelli, C. C., van Wee, B., Molin, E. J. E., & Flyvbjerg, B. (2012) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.04.002 · Cited by 179
An Analytical Network Process model for risks prioritisation in megaprojects
Boateng, P., Chen, Z., & Ogunlana, S. O. (2015) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.08.007 · Cited by 172
Khodakarami, V., & Abdi, A. (2014) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.01.001 · Cited by 170
Improved AHP Method and Its Application in Risk Identification
Li, F., Phoon, K., Du, X., & Zhang, M. (2013) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000605 · Cited by 170
A fuzzy Bayesian belief network for safety assessment of oil and gas pipelines
Kabir, G., Sadiq, R., & Tesfamariam, S. (2015) · Structure and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1080/15732479.2015.1053093 · Cited by 168
Ji, Y., Huang, G., & Sun, W. (2014) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.12.026 · Cited by 165
Modelling and assessment of critical risks in BOT road projects
Thomas, A., Kalidindi, S. N., & Ganesh, L. S. (2006) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446190500435275 · Cited by 165
Cheng, M., Tsai, H., & Sudjono, E. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.080 · Cited by 165
Islam, M. S., Nepal, M. P., Skitmore, M., & Attarzadeh, M. (2017) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2017.06.001 · Cited by 163
Lu, Y., Luo, L., Wang, H., Le, Y., & Shi, Q. (2014) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.12.005 · Cited by 159
Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis of Bridge Construction in Pakistan: Establishing Risk Guidelines
Choudhry, R. M., Aslam, M. A., Hinze, J. W., & Arain, F. M. (2014) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000857 · Cited by 158
BBN-based software project risk management
Fan, C.-F., & Yu, Y.-C. (2004) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2003.12.032 · Cited by 158
Li, P., Chen, G.-H., Dai, L., & Zhang, L. (2012) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.03.017 · Cited by 156
Cost Overrun and Cause in Korean Social Overhead Capital Projects: Roads, Rails, Airports, and Ports
Lee, J. (2008) · Journal of Urban Planning and Development · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9488(2008)134:2(59 · Cited by 143
Time Delay and Cost Overrun in Qatari Public Construction Projects
Senouci, A. B., Ismail, A., & Eldin, N. N. (2016) · Procedia Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.632 · Cited by 141
Love, P. E. D., Ahiaga-Dagbui, D. D., & Irani, Z. (2016) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.08.007 · Cited by 138
Hossen, M. M., Kang, S.-K., & Kim, J. (2015) · Nuclear Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.net.2014.12.019 · Cited by 137
A fuzzy analytic network process model to mitigate the risks associated with offshore wind farms
Shafiee, M. (2014) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.10.019 · Cited by 135
Risk evaluation of tunneling projects
Fouladgar, M. M., Yazdani–Chamzini, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2012) · Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.acme.2012.03.008 · Cited by 128
Development of project cost contingency estimation model using risk analysis and fuzzy expert system
Idrus, A., Nuruddin, M. F., & Rohman, M. A. (2010) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.061 · Cited by 127
A knowledge-based risk mapping tool for cost estimation of international construction projects
Yildiz, A. E., Dikmen, İ., Birgönül, M. T., Ercoskun, K., & Alten, S. (2014) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2014.03.010 · Cited by 127
Project risk management: A deterministic quantitative technique for assessment and mitigation
Muriana, C., & Vizzini, G. B. (2017) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.010 · Cited by 121
Risk assessment of international construction projects using the analytic network process
Qammaz, A. S. B., Dikmen, İ., & Birgönül, M. T. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering · doi:10.1139/l09-061 · Cited by 120
COMPREHENSIVE RISK MANAGEMENT USING FUZZY FMEA AND MCDA TECHNIQUES IN HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
Ahmadi, M., Behzadian, K., Ardeshir, A., & Kapelan, Z. S. (2016) · Journal of Civil Engineering and Management · doi:10.3846/13923730.2015.1068847 · Cited by 120
Risk management in construction projects
Szymański, P. (2017) · Procedia Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.036 · Cited by 117
Kim, D. Y., Han, S. H., Kim, H., & Park, H.-D. (2008) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.12.048 · Cited by 115
Valipour, A., Yahaya, N., Md Noor, N., Kildienė, S., Sarvari, H., & Mardani, A. (2015) · Journal of Civil Engineering and Management · doi:10.3846/13923730.2015.1051104 · Cited by 111
Towards an efficient risk assessment in software projects–Fuzzy reinforcement paradigm
Sangaiah, A. K., Samuel, O. W., Li, X., Abdel‐Basset, M., & Wang, H. (2017) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.07.022 · Cited by 111
A decision framework for risk management, with application to the offshore oil and gas industry
Aven, T., Vinnem, J. E., & Wiencke, H. S. (2006) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2005.12.009 · Cited by 107
Adeleke, A. Q., Bahaudin, A. Y., Kamaruddeen, A. M., Bamgbade, J. A., Salimon, M. G., Khan, M. W. A., & Sorooshian, S. (2018) · Safety and Health at Work · doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2017.05.004 · Cited by 107
A method for exploring the interdependencies and importance of critical infrastructures
Huang, C.-N., Liou, J. J. H., & Chuang, Y.-C. (2014) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2013.10.010 · Cited by 106
Fuzzy based risk assessment module for metropolitan construction project: An empirical study
Samantra, C., Datta, S., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2017) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2017.04.019 · Cited by 103
Overruns in transportation infrastructure projects
Love, P. E. D., Sing, C.-P., Wang, X., Irani, Z., & Thwala, W. D. (2012) · Structure and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1080/15732479.2012.715173 · Cited by 102
Hybrid Models of Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms for Predicting Preliminary Cost Estimates
Kim, G. H., Seo, D., & Kang, K.-I. (2005) · Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)0887-3801(2005)19:2(208 · Cited by 101
Interactions-based risk clustering methodologies and algorithms for complex project management
Marle, F., Vidal, L., & Bocquet, J. (2010) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.022 · Cited by 100
Applegate, C. J., & Tien, I. (2017) · Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure · doi:10.1080/23789689.2017.1345253 · Cited by 100
Analysis of delays in Tanzanian construction industry
Sambasivan, M., Deepak, T. J., Salim, A. N., & Venishri, P. (2017) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-09-2015-0145 · Cited by 97
AHP-based risk analysis of energy performance contracting projects in Russia
Garbuzova‐Schlifter, M., & Madlener, R. (2016) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.024 · Cited by 94
Analysis of cost-increasing risk factors in modular construction in Korea using FMEA
Lee, J., & Kim, Y.-S. (2016) · KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12205-016-0194-1 · Cited by 93
Schedule risk analysis of infrastructure projects: A hybrid dynamic approach
Xu, X., Wang, J., Li, C. Z., Huang, W., & Xia, N. (2018) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2018.07.026 · Cited by 89
Developing a risk assessment method for complex pipe jacking construction projects
Cheng, M., & Lu, Y. (2015) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2015.07.011 · Cited by 88
Fang, C., Marle, F., Xie, M., & Zio, E. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2013.2242078 · Cited by 87
Measuring Project Management Performance: Case of Construction Industry
Demirkesen, S., & Ozorhon, B. (2017) · Engineering Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10429247.2017.1380579 · Cited by 84
Shariat, R., Roozbahani, A., & Ebrahimian, A. (2018) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.074 · Cited by 83
Arashpour, M., Abbasi, B., Arashpour, M., Hosseini, M. R., & Yang, R. J. (2017) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.016 · Cited by 82
Synthesis of Modeling and Simulation Methods on Critical Infrastructure Interdependencies Research
Satumtira, G., & Dueñas‐Osorio, L. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-11405-2_1 · Cited by 81
House of Project Complexity—understanding complexity in large infrastructure projects
Lessard, D. R., Sakhrani, V., & Miller, R. L. (2014) · Engineering Project Organization Journal · doi:10.1080/21573727.2014.907151 · Cited by 80
Praščević, N., & Praščević, Ž. (2017) · Journal of Civil Engineering and Management · doi:10.3846/13923730.2017.1388278 · Cited by 78
Risk paths in BIM adoption: empirical study of China
Zhao, X., Wu, P., & Wang, X. (2018) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-08-2017-0169 · Cited by 76
Dealing with project complexity by matrix-based propagation modelling for project risk analysis
Fang, C., & Marle, F. (2012) · Journal of Engineering Design · doi:10.1080/09544828.2012.720014 · Cited by 71
Using analytic network process to assess business failure risks of construction firms
Dikmen, İ., Birgönül, M. T., Özorhon, B., & Sapci, N. E. (2010) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/09699981011056574 · Cited by 70
A total environmental risk assessment model for international hub airports
Chen, Z., Li, H., Ren, H., Xu, Q., & Hong, J. Y. (2011) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.03.004 · Cited by 68
Analyzing Risk Impact Factors Using Extended Fuzzy Cognitive Maps
Lazzerini, B., & Mkrtchyan, L. (2011) · IEEE Systems Journal · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2011.2134730 · Cited by 66
A multi-agent model to manage risks in construction project (SMACC)
Taillandier, F., Taillandier, P., Tepeli, E., Breysse, D., Mehdizadeh, R., & Khartabil, F. (2015) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2015.06.005 · Cited by 65
Jin, X. (2010) · Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000058 · Cited by 65
Abdelgawad, M., & Fayek, A. R. (2011) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000471 · Cited by 63
Which Risk Management Is Most Crucial for Controlling Project Cost?
Jung, W., & Han, S. H. (2017) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000547 · Cited by 61
Ebrat, M., & Ghodsi, R. (2014) · KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12205-014-0139-5 · Cited by 59
Range estimation of construction costs using neural networks with bootstrap prediction intervals
Sönmez, R. (2011) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.042 · Cited by 59
Probabilistic assessment of tunnel construction performance based on data
Špačková, O., Šejnoha, J., & Straub, D. (2013) · Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tust.2013.02.006 · Cited by 57
Capturing and Integrating Knowledge for Managing Risks in Tunnel Works
Cárdenas, I. C., Al-Jibouri, S. H. S., Halman, J. I. M., & van Tol, A. F. (2012) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01829.x · Cited by 57
Alex, D. P., Al‐Hussein, M., Bouferguène, A., & Fernando, S. (2009) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000184 · Cited by 50
A quantitative risk assessment methodology for construction project
Gupta, V. K., & Thakkar, J. J. (2018) · Sadhana · doi:10.1007/s12046-018-0846-6 · Cited by 50
Power Plant Project Risk Assessment Using a Fuzzy-Anp and Fuzzy-Topsis Method
Zegordi, S. H. (2012) · International Journal of Engineering · doi:10.5829/idosi.ije.2012.25.02b.04 · Cited by 49
Tsavdaroglou, M., Al-Jibouri, S. H. S., Bles, T., & Halman, J. I. M. (2018) · International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection · doi:10.1016/j.ijcip.2018.04.002 · Cited by 49
Construction risk modelling and assessment: insights from a literature review
Taroun, A., Yang, J.-N., & Lowe, D. (2011) · University of Bedfordshire Repository (University of Bedfordshire) · Cited by 47
Wang, X., Zhu, J., Ma, F., Li, C., Cai, Y., & Yang, Z. (2015) · Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment · doi:10.1007/s00477-015-1113-6 · Cited by 46
Cheng, M., & Hoang, N. (2012) · Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000275 · Cited by 46
Modeling Risk‐Related Knowledge in Tunneling Projects
Cárdenas, I. C., Al-Jibouri, S. H. S., Halman, J. I. M., & van Tol, A. F. (2013) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12094 · Cited by 46
A Fuzzy-bayesian Model for Risk Assessment in Power Plant Projects
Islam, M. S., & Nepal, M. (2016) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.259 · Cited by 45
Cost Estimation Methods for Transport Infrastructure: A Systematic Literature Review
Barakchi, M., Torp, O., & Belay, A. M. (2017) · Procedia Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.199 · Cited by 45
Adeleke, A. Q., Bahaudin, A. Y., & Kamaruddeen, A. M. (2017) · Global Business Review · doi:10.1177/0972150916677460 · Cited by 45
External risk management practices of Chinese construction firms in Singapore
Low, S. P., Liu, J., & He, S. (2009) · KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12205-009-0085-9 · Cited by 43
Risk-based estimate for operational safety in complex projects under uncertainty
Zhang, L., Huang, Y., Wu, X., & Skibniewski, M. J. (2017) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2017.01.020 · Cited by 42
A genetic algorithm with neighborhood search for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem
Proon, S., & Jin, M. (2011) · Naval Research Logistics (NRL) · doi:10.1002/nav.20439 · Cited by 41
Probabilistic approach to assessing and monitoring settlements caused by tunneling
Andreu, C. C., Špačková, O., Straub, D., & Molins, C. (2015) · Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.041 · Cited by 41
Vu, H. A., Cu, V. H., Min, L., & Wang, J. Q. (2017) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-06-2016-0138 · Cited by 41
Quantifying the risk of project delays with a genetic algorithm
Pfeifer, J., Barker, K., Ramírez-Márquez, J. E., & Tajik, N. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.09.007 · Cited by 40
Hwang, W., Hsiao, B., Chen, H., & Chern, C.-C. (2016) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1002/pmj.21563 · Cited by 40
Valipour, A., Yahaya, N., Noor, N. M., Mardani, A., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2016) · International Journal of Strategic Property Management · doi:10.3846/1648715x.2016.1210547 · Cited by 40
Project risk management processes: improving coordination using a clustering approach
Marle, F., & Vidal, L. (2011) · Research in Engineering Design · doi:10.1007/s00163-011-0106-9 · Cited by 39
Artificial neural network cost flow risk assessment model
Odeyinka, H. A., Lowe, J. G., & Kaka, A. P. (2013) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446193.2013.802363 · Cited by 38
Applying Importance Measures to Risk Analysis in Engineering Project Using a Risk Network Model
Fang, C., Marle, F., & Xie, M. (2016) · IEEE Systems Journal · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2016.2536701 · Cited by 38
Kimiagari, S., & Keivanpour, S. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1503426 · Cited by 38
Taylor, J. E., & Berges, M. E. (2013) · Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000359 · Cited by 37
Structural Equation Model for Investigating Risk Factors Affecting Project Success in Surabaya
Chandra, H. P. (2015) · Procedia Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.009 · Cited by 37
A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Technique for Stochastic Task Criticality in Project Management
Floyd, M. K., Barker, K., Rocco, C. M., & Whitman, M. G. (2017) · Engineering Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10429247.2017.1340038 · Cited by 36
Project Risk time Management – A Proposed Model and a Case Study in the Construction Industry
Gładysz, B., Skorupka, D., Kuchta, D., & Duchaczek, A. (2015) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.459 · Cited by 35
Amiri, M., & Golozari, F. (2010) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-010-2928-4 · Cited by 35
Integrated Risk of Progress-Based Costs and Schedule Delays in Construction Projects
Pehlivan, S., & Oztemir, A. E. (2018) · Engineering Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10429247.2018.1439636 · Cited by 32
Application of Fuzzy Modelling to Predict Construction Projects Cash Flow
Tabei, S. M. A., Bagherpour, M., & Mahmoudi, A. (2019) · Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering · doi:10.3311/ppci.13402 · Cited by 32
Risk Management theory: the integrated perspective and its application in the public sector
Cienfuegos, I. (2013) · Estado Gobierno y Gestión Pública · doi:10.5354/0717-8980.2013.29402 · Cited by 31
Project Risk Factors Facing Construction Management Firms
Park, K., Lee, H. W., Choi, K., & Lee, S. (2017) · International Journal of Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/s40999-017-0262-z · Cited by 31
Dynamic demand risk assessment for toll road projects
Alasad, R., & Motawa, I. A. (2016) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446193.2016.1143561 · Cited by 29
An ANP Model for Risk Assessment in Large-Scale Transport Infrastructure Projects
Yücelgazi, F., & Yitmen, İ. (2018) · Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s13369-018-3314-z · Cited by 28
Ouyang, C., & Chen, W. (2017) · Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers · doi:10.1080/02533839.2017.1335620 · Cited by 27
A Computerized Method for Delay Risk Assessment Based on Fuzzy Set Theory using MS Project™
Budayan, C., Dikmen, İ., Birgönül, M. T., & Ghaziani, A. (2018) · KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12205-018-0810-3 · Cited by 27
Mehlawat, M. K., & Gupta, P. (2015) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7610-4 · Cited by 25
Measuring risk-associated activity’s duration: A fuzzy set theory application
Ock, J.-H., & Han, S.-H. (2010) · KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12205-010-1003-x · Cited by 23
Application of Analytic Network Process (ANP) in Assessing Construction Risk of Urban Bridge Project
Lu, S.-T., Lin, C.-W., & Ko, P.-H. (2007) · doi:10.1109/icicic.2007.172 · Cited by 23
An integrated management approach of the project and project risks
Rodney, E., Ducq, Y., Breysse, D., & Ledoux, Y. (2015) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.136 · Cited by 22
Lin, L., & Hsu, T. (2007) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9053-3 · Cited by 21
Risk Assessment Based On Fuzzy Network (F-ANP) In New Campus Construction Project
Zhou, L., & Yang, J. (2011) · Systems Engineering Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.sepro.2011.08.027 · Cited by 21
Risk Consideration and Cost Estimation in Construction Projects Using Monte Carlo Simulation
Peleskei, C., Dorca, V., Munteanu, R. A., & Munteanu, R. (2015) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 21
Khademi, N., Behnia, K., & Saedi, R. (2013) · The Engineering Economist · doi:10.1080/0013791x.2013.855856 · Cited by 19
Dekker, S. W. A. (2012) · Advances in business strategy and competitive advantage book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2509-9.ch011 · Cited by 17
Bayesian Network Inference on Risks of Construction Schedule-Cost
Liu, J. (2010) · doi:10.1109/isme.2010.120 · Cited by 16
Develop a ranking algorithm for the green building project
Chang, C. (2012) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-012-9812-2 · Cited by 12
Applying the analytic network process for risk assessment in sustainable ground improvement
Marčić, D., Kovačević, M. S., & Cerić, A. (2013) · Journal of the Croatian Association of Civil Engineers · doi:10.14256/jce.841.2013 · Cited by 11
Kim, Y., & Kang, H.-W. (2016) · KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12205-016-1510-5 · Cited by 9
The model of project risk assessment based on BP neural network algorithm
Bai, L., & Li, F. (2013) · International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology (ICCSNT) · doi:10.1109/iccsnt.2013.6967122 · Cited by 8
Project Reliability Model Considering Time – Cost – Resource Relationship under Uncertainty
Saputra, Y. A., & Latiffianti, E. (2015) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.164 · Cited by 6
Software project risk assessing model based on credal networks
Qu, Y., & Tang, X. (2010) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/icmlc.2010.5580516 · Cited by 5
Simulation-Based Scheduling and Risk Assessment of Complex Projects Under Uncertainty
Terstegen, S., Petz, A., Schlick, C. M., & Duckwitz, S. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48661-0_27 · Cited by 4
Classification of Complexity Management Approaches in Engineering
Maurer, M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53448-9_5 · Cited by 4
Fuzzy-based risk prioritization for a hydrogen refueling facility in Malaysia
Chong, H.-Y., Dahari, M., Yap, H. J., & Loong, Y.-T. (2013) · Journal of Zhejiang University. Science A · doi:10.1631/jzus.a1300114 · Cited by 3
Hazza, M. H. F. A., Fadel, M. A., & Adesta, E. Y. T. (2014) · International Conference on Advanced Computer Science Applications and Technologies · doi:10.1109/acsat.2014.38 · Cited by 3
A Decision Support Framework for Assessing the Contextual Factors for Complex Highway Projects
Sinha, A., Strong, K. C., Ozbek, M. E., & Shane, J. S. (2018) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.1177/0361198118774162 · Cited by 2
Guo-hui, G. (2014) · International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA) · doi:10.1109/icmtma.2014.29 · Cited by 1
Isa, C. M. M., Saman, H. M., Nasir, S. R. M., Preece, C., & Rani, N. I. A. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-287-290-6_11 · Cited by 1
Parihar, S., Bhar, C., & Srivastava, N. K. (2015) · Jindal Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1177/2278682116655662 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 2013, Managing the Continuum: Certainty, Uncertainty, Unpredictability in Large Engineering Projects
- 2016, Managing Complex, High Risk Projects
- 2013, Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process
- 2015, Risk analysis at the edge of chaos, Cost Engineering, 57, 28
- 2016, Risk and stakeholder management tools, Project Management ToolBox, 182, 351
- 2014, Risk Management for Engineering Projects
- 2003, The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Decision Making and the Analytic Network Process (ANP) for Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback, Creative Decisions Foundation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103517 · Cited by 1,336
Opportunities and Adoption Challenges of AI in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Review
Regona, M., Yiğitcanlar, T., Xia, B., & Li, R. Y. M. (2022) · Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity · doi:10.3390/joitmc8010045 · Cited by 696
Popescu, S. M., Mansoor, S., Wani, O. A., Kumar, S. S., Sharma, V., Sharma, A., Arya, V. M., Kirkham, M. B., Hou, D., Bolan, N., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2024.1336088 · Cited by 246
Artificial Intelligence Enabled Project Management: A Systematic Literature Review
Taboada, I., Daneshpajouh, A., Toledo, N., & de Vass, T. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13085014 · Cited by 373
Ghimire, P., Kim, K., & Acharya, M. (2024) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings14010220 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Afzal, F., Yunfei, S., Nazir, M., & Bhatti, S. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
- University of the Punjab (PK)
- University of Engineering and Technology Lahore (PK)
- Corresponding author
- Afzal, Farman
- Venue
- International Journal of Managing Projects in Business
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2019-09-24
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 300-328
- ISSN
- 1753-8378 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2980412932
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 154
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Managing Projects in Business (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
- Keywords
- construction risk management, cost risk assessment, cost overruns, artificial intelligence, fuzzy logic, fuzzy neural network, fuzzy simulation, Bayesian networks, uncertainty, hybrid algorithm, subjective risk assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review