Cited by 24Student Assessment and FeedbackEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessEvaluation of Teaching Practices

The Effect of Students' Conceptions of Feedback on Academic Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation: Evidence from Higher Education in Pakistan

Fatima, Shafaque, Ali, Muhammad, Saad, Muhammad Ismail·2022·Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education

Abstract

Purpose This study investigated the influence of students' conceptions of feedback (ScoF) dimensions on academic self-efficacy (SE) and self-regulation (SRG). Design/methodology/approach The study employed the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach on a sample data of 528 students from ten different universities of Karachi city. Findings Results indicate that active use of feedback (AUF) and enjoyment (ENJ) has a positive and significant impact on SE, while ignorance showed an adverse and significant effect on SE. Additionally, SE showed its positive and significant influence on self-regulation. However, meet expectation (MEXPT), peers’ help (PHP) and tutor comment (TC) showed a positive but insignificant impact on SE. Originality/value The study provides useful insights for academicians and policymakers to develop a comprehensive strategy for university students to improve their academic SE and self-regulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jarhe-07-2020-0209

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Correlational studies have provided support for the relationships that conceptions have with self-efficacy, goal orientation, self-regulated learning behaviors, satisfaction with feedback, and academic performance.

    “Correlational studies have provided support for the relationships that conceptions have with other motivational variables, including self-efficacy (Brown et al., 2016;Fatima et al., 2021) and goal orientation (Rakoczy et al., 2013), self-regulated learning (SRL) behaviors (Brown et al., 2016), satisfaction with feedback (Robinson et al., 2013), and academic performance (Brown et al., 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fatima, S., Ali, M., & Saad, M. I.
Affiliations
  • Iqra University (PK)
  • Institute of Business Management (PK)
Venue
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2021-02-10
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
180-199
ISSN
  • 1758-1184 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-7003
OpenAlex
W3132482616
Cited by
24
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
7.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
academic self-efficacy, student self-regulation, university students, peer assistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review