Cited by 56Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Cross-National Associations Among Cyberbullying Victimization, Self-Esteem, and Internet Addiction: Direct and Indirect Effects of Alexithymia

Open access
Wachs, Sebastian, Vazsonyi, Alexander T., Wright, Michelle F., Ksinan Jiskrova, Gabriela·2020·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

The relationship among cyberbullying victimization, lower self-esteem, and internet addiction has been well-established. Yet, little research exists that explains the nature of these associations, and no previous work has considered the inability to identify or describe one’s emotions, namely alexithymia, as a potential mediator of these links. The present study sought to investigate the indirect effects of cyberbullying victimization on self-esteem and internet addiction, mediated by alexithymia. The sample consisted of 1,442 participants between 12 and 17 years (Mage = 14.17, SD = 1.38, 51.5% male) from Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States. Results showed a direct relationship between cyberbullying victimization and self-esteem and an indirect association mediated by alexithymia in the Dutch sample. However, in the German and U.S. samples, only an indirect relationship via alexithymia, but not a direct effect of cyberbullying victimization on self-esteem, was found. Consistent across the three country samples, cyberbullying victimization and internet addiction were directly and also indirectly associated via alexithymia. In sum, findings indicate that alexithymia might help better understand which detrimental effects cyberbullying victimization has on adolescent psychological health. Thus, cyberbullying prevention programs should consider implementing elements that educate adolescents on the ability to identify and describe their own emotions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01368

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cyberbullying victimization reduces individuals' self-esteem.

    “Cyberbullying victimization has also been found to reduce individuals’ self-esteem [34]”

    From How social media usage affects psychological and subjective well-being: testing a moderated mediation model (2023) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Conclusion reports that cyberbullying victimization is related to lower self-esteem, and the Discussion reports an indirect association among adolescents. But the Limitations section explicitly says the cross-sectional study cannot establish causality, so it does not show that victimization *reduces* self-esteem; the claim also broadens an adolescent finding to individuals generally. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Individuals who are bullied typically have lower levels of self-esteem compared to those who are not victimized.

    “Research consistently reveals that individuals who are bullied typically have lower levels of self-esteem compared to those who are not victimized [34, 96].”

    From How social media usage affects psychological and subjective well-being: testing a moderated mediation model (2023) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Introduction links cyberbullying victimization among adolescents to lower self-esteem, supporting the claim in that narrower context. The Discussion reports a direct association only in the Dutch sample, not the American or German samples; the paper therefore does not establish a consistent direct difference for bullied individuals generally. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Wachs, S., Vazsonyi, A. T., Wright, M. F., & Ksinan Jiskrova, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wachs, Sebastian
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2020-06-11
Volume
11
Pages
1368-1368
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035036253
Cited by
56
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
7.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Universität Potsdam
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
cyber victimization, self-esteem, internet addiction, alexithymia, emotional awareness, mediation, adolescents, cross-national comparison, cyberbullying prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review