The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review
Abstract
Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to summarize and classify extant research and to better understand the past, present, and future state of the theory of value co-creation. Its main objectives are: to identify the different theoretical perspectives and research streams that characterize and define the co-creation literature, and to highlight the connections between them; to look for emerging trends and gaps in the literature by comparing the most recent papers with those representing the field's core. Design/methodology/approach: – The paper relies on bibliometric data: co-citation techniques were employed to select, analyze, and interpret citation patterns within the co-creation literature. Findings: – The paper identified two main clusters, as well as specific research streams and common themes, representing scholarly journals’ publications on co-creation over the past years. These research streams and themes apply three different theoretical perspectives: service science, innovation and technology management, and marketing and consumer research. Data from the most recent publications has been used to verify if and how the original streams and themes are reflected in the contemporary debate. Research limitations/implications: – Inevitably, the findings of the analysis have limitations related to the research design, the databases, and the applied bibliometric methods. Practical implications: – From a practical perspective, the research impacts on theory building, management decision making, and teaching. Originality/value: – This study depicts the remarkable development of the literature on co-creation and shows the latent structure underlying its different research streams. To the best knowledge, this study is the first to determine co-citation frequencies from both the SSCI and Scopus databases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 · Cited by 14,779
Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6 · Cited by 7,824
von Hippel, E. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2333.001.0001 · Cited by 3,768
Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research
Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/426626 · Cited by 3,677
Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions
van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., & Verhoef, P. C. (2010) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670510375599 · Cited by 3,536
Managing the co-creation of value
Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0070-0 · Cited by 3,502
Co‐creating unique value with customers
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004) · Strategy & Leadership · doi:10.1108/10878570410699249 · Cited by 2,463
A Role Theory Perspective on Dyadic Interactions: The Service Encounter
Solomon, M. R., Surprenant, C., Czepiel, J. A., & Gutman, E. G. (1985) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251180 · Cited by 2,004 · cited 1×
“More generally, according to the literature, co-creation is inherent in service businesses in which market offerings (quantity, quality, attributes) are actually created in the service encounter (Solomon et al., 1985; Bitner et al., 2000).”
BackgroundRamos‐Rodríguez, A., & Ruíz‐Navarro, J. (2004) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.397 · Cited by 1,626
Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation
Sawhney, M., Verona, G., & Prandelli, E. (2005) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20046 · Cited by 1,406
Cited by
What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation
Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.027 · Cited by 735
Vargas, C., Whelan, J., Brimblecombe, J., & Allender, S. (2022) · Public Health Research and Practice · doi:10.17061/phrp3222211 · Cited by 730
on behalf of the GrandStand, S. S. A. T. G. O. T. M. R. G., Leask, C. F., Sandlund, M., Skelton, D. A., Altenburg, T. M., Cardon, G., Chinapaw, M. J. M., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Verloigne, M., & Chastin, S. F. M. (2019) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-018-0136-9 · Cited by 673
Managing Co-creation Design: A Strategic Approach to Innovation
Frow, P., Nenonen, S., Payne, A., & Storbacka, K. (2015) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12087 · Cited by 518
Customer engagement behaviors: The role of service convenience, fairness and quality
Roy, S. K., Shekhar, V., Lassar, W. M., & Chen, T. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.07.018 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Galvagno, M., & Dalli, D.
- Venue
- Managing Service Quality
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2014-11-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 643-683
- ISSN
- 0960-4529 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041178121
- Cited by
- 884
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 22.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/msq-09-2013-0187
- The paper
- Galvagno, M., & Dalli, D. (2014). Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review. Managing Service Quality. https://doi.org/10.1108/msq-09-2013-0187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.