Cited by 92

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exposure to Online Hate among Young Social Media Users

Oksanen, Atte, Hawdon, James, Holkeri, Emma, Näsi, Matti, Räsänen, Pekka·2014·Sociological Studies of Children and Youth

Abstract

The prevalence of online hate material is a public concern, but few studies have analyzed the extent to which young people are exposed to such material. This study investigated the extent of exposure to and victimization by online hate material among young social media users.,The study analyzed data collected from a sample of Finnish Facebook users (n = 723) between the ages of 15 and 18. Analytic strategies were based on descriptive statistics and logistic regression models.,A majority (67%) of respondents had been exposed to hate material online, with 21% having also fallen victim to such material. The online hate material primarily focused on sexual orientation, physical appearance, and ethnicity and was most widespread on Facebook and YouTube. Exposure to hate material was associated with high online activity, poor attachment to family, and physical offline victimization. Victims of the hate material engaged in high levels of online activity. Their attachment to family was weaker, and they were more likely to be unhappy. Online victimization was also associated with the physical offline victimization.,While the online world has opened up countless opportunities to expand our experiences and social networks, it has also created new risks and threats. Psychosocial problems that young people confront offline overlap with their negative online experiences. When considering the risks of Internet usage, attention should be paid to the problems young people may encounter offline…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/s1537-466120140000018021

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aspects of perpetration that refer to a person-centered basis of hate speech behavior-such as prejudice, bias, a devaluating attitude, hatred, or, most often, the purpose, aim or intention to harm-were mentioned in nine definitions.

    “Aspects of perpetration that refer to a person-centered basis of hate speech behavior—such as prejudice, bias, a devaluating attitude, hatred, or, most often, the purpose, aim or intention to harm—were mentioned in nine definitions (Blaya et al., 2020; Blaya & Audrin, 2019; Oksanen et al., 2014; Räsänen et al., 2016; Vaught, 2012; Wachs et al., 2019, 2020, 2021a).”
  • Oksanen et al. (2014) and Räsänen et al. (2016) stood out as their items addressed more target groups than other studies.

    “Oksanen et al. (2014) and Räsänen et al. (2016) stood out as their items addressed more target groups than other studies.”
  • Six quantitative studies, related to 13 publications, used items that reflected specific verbal and nonverbal forms of hate speech.

    “Six quantitative studies, related to 13 publications, used items that reflected specific verbal and nonverbal forms of hate speech, such as messages, comments, words, graffiti, memes etc. (exceptions: Oksanen et al., 2014; Räsänen et al., 2016; Soral et al., 2018; Tynes, 2005; Vaught, 2012).”
  • The prevalence of hate speech was generally studied and reported in online contexts.

    “The prevalence of hate speech was generally studied and reported in online contexts (Blaya et al., 2020; Blaya & Audrin, 2019; Oksanen et al., 2014; Räsänen et al., 2016; Tynes, 2005; Wachs et al., 2019b, 2019a, 2020, 2021a, Wachs & Wright, 2018, 2019, 2020).”
  • Prevalences based on specific hate-speech characteristics were reported only in six publications.

    “Prevalences based on specific hate-speech characteristics were reported only in six publications, namely: forms (Wachs et al., 2021a); locations (Blaya & Audrin, 2019; Oksanen et al., 2014; Tynes, 2005); targets (Elpus & Carter, 2016; Oksanen et al., 2014; Räsänen et al., 2016; Tynes, 2005); and perpetrators of hate material (Blaya & Audrin, 2019).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Amster S. E., 2009, Hate crimes, 221
  2. Andersson M., 2012, Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 19, 418, 10.1080/1070289X.2012.684442 · DOI
  3. 10.1163/157181711X553933 · DOI
  4. Bartlett J., 2011, The new face of digital populism
  5. 10.1007/978-1-4614-5526-4_14 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/0044118X11407525 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/10646170902869544 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/00380237.2000.10571166 · DOI
  9. Caiani M., 2013, European and American extreme right groups and the Internet
  10. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.08.009 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00948.x · DOI
  12. Douglas K. M., 2007, The Oxford handbook of internet psychology, 155
  13. 10.1177/0894439304271538 · DOI
  14. 10.1177/0196859903252850 · DOI
  15. Foxman A., 2013, Viral hate: Containing its spread on the internet
  16. 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2003.00013.x · DOI
  17. 10.1111/1540-4560.00255 · DOI
  18. Hasebrink U., 2011, Patterns of risk and safety online: In-depth analyses from the EU Kids Online survey of 9- to 16-year-olds and their parents in 25 European countries
  19. Hawdon J., 2012, Research on Finnish Society, 5, 39, 10.51815/fjsr.110713 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s10902-013-9441-z · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02587.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1037/a0030309 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/0002764202045006003 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/1540-4560.00264 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00415.x · DOI
  26. 10.1080/13676261.2010.506530 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/0002764202045006004 · DOI
  28. 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1027 · DOI
  29. Livingstone S., 2009, Children and the internet
  30. Livingstone S., 2011, Risks and safety on the Internet: The perspective of European children. Full findings of the EU kids online
  31. 10.1177/1461444809342697 · DOI
  32. 10.1177/0010414011427851 · DOI
  33. 10.2307/1289306 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/03637751003758227 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.06.009 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/15295030902860252 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.techsoc.2011.03.003 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/17450128.2012.752119 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/978-1-4614-5526-4_9 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/15374416.2012.759228 · DOI
  41. 10.1177/0001699312466179 · DOI
  42. 10.1177/1461444809105347 · DOI
  43. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.79 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Tynes B., 2006, Handbook of children, culture, and violence, 267
  45. 10.4159/harvard.9780674065086 · DOI
  46. 10.1007/s10940-007-9039-x · DOI
  47. 10.1037/2152-0828.1.S.13 · DOI
  48. 10.1542/peds.2011-0118 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Oksanen, A., Hawdon, J., Holkeri, E., Näsi, M., & Räsänen, P.
Venue
Sociological Studies of Children and Youth
Published
2014-09-25
Pages
253-273
ISSN
1537-4661
Cited by
92
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review