Cited by 369Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

How Risky Are Social Networking Sites? A Comparison of Places Online Where Youth Sexual Solicitation and Harassment Occurs

Ybarra, Michele L., Mitchell, Kimberly J.·2008·Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective Recently, public attention has focused on the possibility that social networking sites such as MySpace and Facebook are being widely used to sexually solicit underage youth, consequently increasing their vulnerability to sexual victimization. Beyond anecdotal accounts, however, whether victimization is more commonly reported in social networking sites is unknown. Participants and methods The Growing up With Media Survey is a national cross-sectional online survey of 1588 youth. Participants were 10- to 15-year-old youth who have used the Internet at least once in the last 6 months. The main outcome measures were unwanted sexual solicitation on the Internet, defined as unwanted requests to talk about sex, provide personal sexual information, and do something sexual, and Internet harassment, defined as rude or mean comments, or spreading of rumors. Results Fifteen percent of all of the youth reported an unwanted sexual solicitation online in the last year; 4% reported an incident on a social networking site specifically. Thirty-three percent reported an online harassment in the last year; 9% reported an incident on a social networking site specifically. Among targeted youth, solicitations were more commonly reported via instant messaging (43%) and in chat rooms (32%), and harassment was more commonly reported in instant messaging (55%) than through social networking sites (27% and 28%, respectively). Conclusions Broad claims of victimization risk, at least defined as…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2007-0693

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current data suggest that online harassment is not as common as offline harassment, and participation in social networking sites does not put most children at risk of online harassment.

    “Current data suggest that online harassment is not as common as offline harassment, 15 and participation in social networking sites does not put most children at risk of online harassment. 16”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J.
Affiliations
  • Internet Solutions for Kids, Inc, Santa Ana, California
  • University of New Hampshire (US)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2008-02-01
Volume
121
Issue
2
Pages
e350-e357
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2025496001
Cited by
367
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 40
FWCI
91.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U49/CE000206-02)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
social networking sites, online sexual solicitation, online harassment, MySpace, Facebook, instant messaging, chat rooms, cyberbullying, online mental health services
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Public Policy, Social Behavior, Social Support, United States, Sexual Harassment, Crime Victims, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review