Cited by 290Spam and Phishing DetectionMisinformation and Its ImpactsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

Uncovering social network Sybils in the wild

Yang, Zhi, Wilson, Christo, Wang, Xiao, Gao, Tingting, Zhao, Ben Y., Dai, Yafei·2014·ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data

Abstract

Sybil accounts are fake identities created to unfairly increase the power or resources of a single malicious user. Researchers have long known about the existence of Sybil accounts in online communities such as file-sharing systems, but they have not been able to perform large-scale measurements to detect them or measure their activities. In this article, we describe our efforts to detect, characterize, and understand Sybil account activity in the Renren Online Social Network (OSN). We use ground truth provided by Renren Inc. to build measurement-based Sybil detectors and deploy them on Renren to detect more than 100,000 Sybil accounts. Using our full dataset of 650,000 Sybils, we examine several aspects of Sybil behavior. First, we study their link creation behavior and find that contrary to prior conjecture, Sybils in OSNs do not form tight-knit communities. Next, we examine the fine-grained behaviors of Sybils on Renren using clickstream data. Third, we investigate behind-the-scenes collusion between large groups of Sybils. Our results reveal that Sybils with no explicit social ties still act in concert to launch attacks. Finally, we investigate enhanced techniques to identify stealthy Sybils. In summary, our study advances the understanding of Sybil behavior on OSNs and shows that Sybils can effectively avoid existing community-based Sybil detectors. We hope that our results will foster new research on Sybil detection that is based on novel types of Sybil features.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2556609

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some providers generate fake popularity signals using automated bots, while others use realistic accounts and even crowdsourced real humans.

    “some providers generate fake popularity signals using automated bots (aka. sybils), but some others use realistic accounts and even crowdsourced real humans (aka. crowdturfing) [58, 83, 84, 93, 100].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, Z., Wilson, C., Wang, X., Gao, T., Zhao, B. Y., & Dai, Y.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Renren Inc., Beijing, China
Venue
ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
Published
2014-02
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
1-29
ISSN
  • 1556-4681 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-472X
OpenAlex
W2092277251
Cited by
290
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
95.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (61202423)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2011CB302305, 2013AA013203)
  • Division of Information and Intelligent Systems (IIS-0916307 and IIS-847925)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
Sybil detection, social networking sites, Renren, false identity, community structure, clickstream data, collusion, malicious user behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review