Cited by 164Spam and Phishing DetectionComplex Network Analysis TechniquesMisinformation and Its Impacts

Uncovering social network sybils in the wild

Yang, Zhi, Wilson, Christo, Wang, Xiao, Gao, Tingting, Zhao, Ben Y., Dai, Yafei·2011·Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference

Abstract

Sybil accounts are fake identities created to unfairly increase the power or resources of a single user. Researchers have long known about the existence of Sybil accounts in online communities such as file-sharing systems, but have not been able to perform large scale measurements to detect them or measure their activities. In this paper, we describe our efforts to detect, characterize and understand Sybil account activity in the Renren online social network (OSN). We use ground truth provided by Renren Inc. to build measurement based Sybil account detectors, and deploy them on Renren to detect over 100,000 Sybil accounts. We study these Sybil accounts, as well as an additional 560,000 Sybil accounts caught by Renren, and analyze their link creation behavior. Most interestingly, we find that contrary to prior conjecture, Sybil accounts in OSNs do not form tight-knit communities. Instead, they integrate into the social graph just like normal users. Using link creation timestamps, we verify that the large majority of links between Sybil accounts are created accidentally, unbeknownst to the attacker. Overall, only a very small portion of Sybil accounts are connected to other Sybils with social links. Our study shows that existing Sybil defenses are unlikely to succeed in today's OSNs, and we must design new techniques to effectively detect and defend against Sybil attacks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2068816.2068841

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior work has focused extensively on analysis and detection of sybil and/or fake accounts in online social networks by relying on tightly-knit community structures.

    “Prior work has focused quite extensively on the analysis and the detection of sybil and/or fake accounts in online social networks by relying on tightly-knit community structures [54, 15, 53, 9, 52, 5].”

    From Measuring, Characterizing, and Detecting Facebook Like Farms (2017) · cites this paper as [53]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, Z., Wilson, C., Wang, X., Gao, T., Zhao, B. Y., & Dai, Y.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Renren Inc., Beijing, China
Venue
Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference
Publisher
ACM
Published
2011-11-02
Pages
259-268
OpenAlex
W2139144138
Cited by
164
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 15
FWCI
16.82
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
Sybil attack, social networking sites, Renren, Sybil detection, false identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review