Cited by 319Time Series Analysis and ForecastingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMusic and Audio Processing

Transfer learning for time series classification

Open access
Ismail Fawaz, Hassan, Forestier, Germain, Weber, Jonathan, Idoumghar, Lhassane, Muller, Pierre-Alain·2018·2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)

Abstract

Transfer learning for deep neural networks is the process of first training a base network on a source dataset, and then transferring the learned features (the network’s weights) to a second network to be trained on a target dataset. This idea has been shown to improve deep neural network’s generalization capabilities in many computer vision tasks such as image recognition and object localization. Apart from these applications, deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have also recently gained popularity in the Time Series Classification (TSC) community. However, unlike for image recognition problems, transfer learning techniques have not yet been investigated thoroughly for the TSC task. This is surprising as the accuracy of deep learning models for TSC could potentially be improved if the model is fine-tuned from a pre-trained neural network instead of training it from scratch. In this paper, we fill this gap by investigating how to transfer deep CNNs for the TSC task. To evaluate the potential of transfer learning, we performed extensive experiments using the UCR archive which is the largest publicly available TSC benchmark containing 85 datasets. For each dataset in the archive, we pre-trained a model and then fine-tuned it on the other datasets resulting in 7140 different deep neural networks. These experiments revealed that transfer learning can improve or degrade the models predictions depending on the dataset used for transfer. Therefore, in an effort to predict the best source dataset for a given target dataset, we propose a new method relying on Dynamic Time Warping to measure inter-datasets similarities. We describe how our method can guide the transfer to choose the best source dataset leading to an improvement in accuracy on 71 out of 85 datasets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/bigdata.2018.8621990

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using a dataset augmented with synthetic training samples generally yields higher classification accuracy than using the original dataset.

    “In general, using the dataset augmented with synthetic training samples yields higher classification accuracy when compared to using the original dataset [36,56,261,262].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [4][4] C. Zhang, S. Bengio, M. Hardt, B. Recht, and O. Vinyals, 'Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization,' ArXiv , 2016. -
  2. [29][29] I. B. Arief-Ang, F. D. Salim, and M. Hamilton, 'DA-HOC: Semisupervised Domain Adaptation for Room Occupancy Prediction Using CO2 Sensor Data,' in International Conference on Systems for EnergyEfficient Built Environments , 2017, pp. 1-10. -
  3. [32][32] S. Spiegel, 'Transfer Learning for Time Series Classification in Dissimilarity Spaces,' in European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases , 2016. -
  4. [46][46] M. Abadi, P. Barham, J. Chen, Z. Chen, A. Davis, J. Dean, M. Devin, S. Ghemawat, G. Irving, M. Isard, M. Kudlur, J. Levenberg, R. Monga, S. Moore, D. G. Murray, B. Steiner, P. Tucker, V. Vasudevan, P. Warden, M. Wicke, Y. Yu, and X. Zheng, 'TensorFlow: A System for Largescale Machine Learning,' in USENIX Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation , 2016, pp. 265-283. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ismail Fawaz, H., Forestier, G., Weber, J., Idoumghar, L., & Muller, P.-A.
Affiliations
Université de Haute-Alsace (FR)
Venue
2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-12
Pages
1367-1376
OpenAlex
W2898843852
Cited by
319
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 25
FWCI
21.95
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Nvidia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
Keywords
transfer learning, time series classification, convolutional neural networks, fine-tuning, pre-trained models, dynamic time warping, generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review