Cited by 162Machine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Boosting Deep Learning Risk Prediction with Generative Adversarial Networks for Electronic Health Records

Che, Zhengping, Cheng, Yu, Zhai, Shuangfei, Sun, Zhaonan, Liu, Yan·2017·2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)

Abstract

The rapid growth of Electronic Health Records (EHRs), as well as the accompanied opportunities in Data-Driven Healthcare (DDH), has been attracting widespread interests and attentions. Recent progress in the design and applications of deep learning methods has shown promising results and is forcing massive changes in healthcare academia and industry, but most of these methods rely on massive labeled data. In this work, we propose a general deep learning framework which is able to boost risk prediction performance with limited EHR data. Our model takes a modified generative adversarial network namely ehrGAN, which can provide plausible labeled EHR data by mimicking real patient records, to augment the training dataset in a semi-supervised learning manner. We use this generative model together with a convolutional neural network (CNN) based prediction model to improve the onset prediction performance. Experiments on two real healthcare datasets demonstrate that our proposed framework produces realistic data samples and achieves significant improvements on classification tasks with the generated data over several stat-of-the-art baselines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icdm.2017.93

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data augmentation techniques such as GANs may still not have good diversity to build a comprehensive dataset for efficient data training.

    “One can use data augmentation techniques such as generative adversarial networks (GANs) [28] to solve these issues, but it may still not have good diversity to build a comprehensive dataset for efficient data training.”

    From Federated learning for smart healthcare: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [28]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Che, Z., Cheng, Y., Zhai, S., Sun, Z., & Liu, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • IBM (United States) (US)
  • Binghamton University (US)
  • IBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center (US)
Venue
2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-11
Pages
787-792
ISSN
1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963034797
Cited by
162
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4
FWCI
6.71
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
electronic health records, risk prediction, generative adversarial networks, semi-supervised learning, data augmentation, limited labeled data, convolutional neural networks, onset prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review