Cited by 19Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignWireless Body Area Networks

A wireless neural interface for chronic recording,

Harrison, Reid R., Kier, Ryan J., Kim, Sohee, Rieth, Loren, Warren, David J., Ledbetter, Noah M., Clark, Gregory A., Solzbacher, Florian +5 more·2008·2008 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference

Abstract

A primary goal of the integrated neural interface project (INIP) is to develop a wireless, implantable device capable of recording neural activity from 100 micromachined electrodes. The heart of this recording system is a low-power integrated circuit that amplifies 100 weak neural signals, detects spikes with programmable threshold-crossing circuits, and returns these data via digital radio telemetry. The chip receives power, clock, and command signals through a coil-to-coil inductive link. Here we report that the isolated integrated circuit successfully recorded and wirelessly transmitted digitized electrical activity from peripheral nerve and cortex at 15.7 kS/s. The chip also simultaneously performed accurate on-chip spike detection and wirelessly transmitted the spike threshold-crossing data. We also present preliminary successful results from full system integration and packaging.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/biocas.2008.4696890

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A wireless neural interface could still accurately transmit recorded potentials in peripheral nerves with a USEA.

    “Harrison et al. showed that a wireless neural interface could still accurately transmit recorded potentials in peripheral nerves with a USEA (Harrison et al., 2008).”

    From Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics (2018) · cites this paper as Harrison et al., 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrison, R. R., Kier, R. J., Kim, S., Rieth, L., Warren, D. J., Ledbetter, N. M., Clark, G. A., Solzbacher, F., Chestek, C. A., Gilja, V., Nuyujukian, P., Ryu, S. I., & Shenoy, K. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
2008 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2008
Pages
125-128
OpenAlex
W2143799451
Cited by
19
References
6
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.66
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
Keywords
wireless neural interface, implantable neural recording, low-power integrated circuits, neural signal amplification, spike detection, inductive power transfer, peripheral nerve recording, cortical recording

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review