Cited by 137Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignWireless Body Area Networks

Long-term reliability of Al 2 O 3 and Parylene C bilayer encapsulated Utah electrode array based neural interfaces for chronic implantation

Open access
Xie, Xianzong, Rieth, Loren, Williams, Layne, Negi, Sandeep, Bhandari, Rajmohan, Caldwell, Ryan, Sharma, Rohit, Tathireddy, Prashant +1 more·2014·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We focus on improving the long-term stability and functionality of neural interfaces for chronic implantation by using bilayer encapsulation. APPROACH: We evaluated the long-term reliability of Utah electrode array (UEA) based neural interfaces encapsulated by 52 nm of atomic layer deposited Al2O3 and 6 µm of Parylene C bilayer, and compared these to devices with the baseline Parylene-only encapsulation. Three variants of arrays including wired, wireless, and active UEAs were used to evaluate this bilayer encapsulation scheme, and were immersed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at 57 °C for accelerated lifetime testing. MAIN RESULTS: The median tip impedance of the bilayer encapsulated wired UEAs increased from 60 to 160 kΩ during the 960 days of equivalent soak testing at 37 °C, the opposite trend to that typically observed for Parylene encapsulated devices. The loss of the iridium oxide tip metallization and etching of the silicon tip in PBS solution contributed to the increase of impedance. The lifetime of fully integrated wireless UEAs was also tested using accelerated lifetime measurement techniques. The bilayer coated devices had stable power-up frequencies at ∼910 MHz and constant radio-frequency signal strength of -50 dBm during up to 1044 days (still under testing) of equivalent soaking time at 37 °C. This is a significant improvement over the lifetime of ∼100 days achieved with Parylene-only encapsulation at 37 °C. The preliminary samples of bilayer coated active UEAs with a flip-chip bonded ASIC chip had a steady current draw of ∼3 mA during 228 days of soak testing at 37 °C. An increase in the current draw has been consistently correlated to device failures, so is a sensitive metric for their lifetime. SIGNIFICANCE: The trends of increasing electrode impedance of wired devices and performance stability of wireless and active devices support the significantly greater encapsulation performance of this bilayer encapsulation compared with Parylene-only encapsulation. The bilayer encapsulation should significantly improve the in vivo lifetime of neural interfaces for chronic implantation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/11/2/026016

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]Donoghue J Comments on Tissue Response for BMI Elecrodes presented at the 40th Neural Interfaces Conference Salt Lake City, UT 2012

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xie, X., Rieth, L., Williams, L., Negi, S., Bhandari, R., Caldwell, R., Sharma, R., Tathireddy, P., & Solzbacher, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Blackrock Microsystems (United States) (US)
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2014-03-24
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
026016
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2061897341
Cited by
137
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns064318-02)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (N66001-06-C-4056)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01-NS064318, 1R01NS064318-01A1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
Keywords
Utah electrode array, neural interfaces, chronic implantation, alumina coatings, Parylene C, long-term reliability, electrode impedance, accelerated life testing, wireless neural interface
MeSH terms
Aluminum Oxide, Electrodes, Implanted, Microelectrodes, Nerve Net, Polymers, Time Factors, Xylenes, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review