The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification
Open accessAbstract
This paper reviews peer-reviewed empirical studies on gamification. We create a framework for examining the effects of gamification by drawing from the definitions of gamification and the discussion on motivational affordances. The literature review covers results, independent variables (examined motivational affordances), dependent variables (examined psychological/behavioral outcomes from gamification), the contexts of gamification, and types of studies performed on the gamified systems. The paper examines the state of current research on the topic and points out gaps in existing literature. The review indicates that gamification provides positive effects, however, the effects are greatly dependent on the context in which the gamification is being implemented, as well as on the users using it. The findings of the review provide insight for further studies as well as for the design of gamified systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Even though considerable research efforts have been made in this field (Hamari et al. 2014;Seaborn and Fels 2015), conclusive meta-analytic evidence on the effectiveness of gamification in the context of learning and education has yet to be provided.”
From The gamification of learning: a meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Hamari et al. 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The use of standardized instruments can help to ensure the comparability of study results and further ensure the reliable measurement of variables (see Hamari et al. 2014).”
From The gamification of learning: a meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Hamari et al. 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The research also indicates that an appropriate design of gamification can meet the psychological needs of learners and promote goal-oriented behavior as well as autonomous learning [11].”
From Design and Implementation of Gamified Augmented Reality Learning System to Enhance Biodiversity Education (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Many digital platforms also often incorporate gamification elements, rewards, and personalized recommendations and such features act to reinforce novelty seeking behaviors by providing immediate feedback and tailored content based on users' preferences and past engagement (Hamari et al., 2014).”
From The impact of digital technology, social media, and artificial intelligence on cognitive functions: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Hamari et al., 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In their literature review of empirical studies on gamification, Hamari et al. (2014) indicated that gamification has a positive influence on users.”
From Monitoring Systems for Checking Websites on Accessibility (2021) · cites this paper as Hamari et al. (2014)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“But how strong this influence is, depends on the particular application and user.”
From Monitoring Systems for Checking Websites on Accessibility (2021) · cites this paper as Hamari et al. (2014)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The results of this meta-analysis can weaken the fear that effects of gamification might not persist in the long run and might thus contradict the interpretations presented in reviews (see Hamari et al. 2014;Seaborn and Fels 2015).”
From The gamification of learning: a meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Hamari et al. 2014
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Previous research suggests that different gamification elements represent motivational affordances that can influence psychological outcomes [23].”
From Examining the effectiveness of gamification in mental health apps for depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [23]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“aligning with the broader findings of Hamari et al. (2014) and Suh et al. (2015, 2016) regarding gamification's positive impact on user behaviour”
From An Experimental Analysis of Gamification’s Impact on Customer Engagement and Retention in Subscription-Based Business Models (2026) · cites this paper as Hamari et al. (2014)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Gamification - defined as the application of game design elements in non-game contexts - has emerged as a promising approach for increasing engagement, motivation, and user participation (Deterding et al., 2011; Hamari et al., 2014).”
From An Experimental Analysis of Gamification’s Impact on Customer Engagement and Retention in Subscription-Based Business Models (2026) · cites this paper as Hamari et al., 2014
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Gamification constitutes an active methodology that can enhance students' motivation and engagement and involves the use of game elements in non-game-related contexts”
From Integrating Augmented Reality, Gamification, and Serious Games in Computer Science Education (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“This finding is supported by studies exploring gamification of tasks, where the use of game design elements (eg, points and scoreboards) can improve motivation [47,48].”
From Wearable technology for high-frequency cognitive and mood assessment in major depressive disorder: longitudinal observational study (2019) · cites this paper as [48]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification"
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011) · Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments · doi:10.1145/2181037.2181040 · Cited by 8,402
Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4132319 · Cited by 7,449
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627 · Cited by 7,176 · cited 1×
“[6]) and hence would in essence undermine gamification which is an attempt to afford for the emergence of intrinsic motivations.”
BackgroundExtrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231 · cited 1×
“attitude formation and behavior; (2) the nature of the system: is the system in question utilitarian or hedonic in nature [5][39]; and (3) the involvement of the user: is it cognitive or affective in nature [43].”
BackgroundUser Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems1
van der Heijden, H. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148660 · Cited by 3,850
Motivations for Play in Online Games
Yee, N. (2006) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.772 · Cited by 2,939
Gamification by Design: Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps
Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. J. L. (2011) · Cited by 2,378
Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes
Domínguez‐Díaz, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., de‐Marcos, L., Sanz, L. F., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J.-J. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020 · Cited by 2,189
The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision, and Application to Advertising
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1943.10673459 · Cited by 1,737
Huotari, K., & Hamari, J. (2012) · International Academic Mindtrek Conference (Mindtrek) · doi:10.1145/2393132.2393137 · Cited by 1,343
Self-citationFeldman, J. M., Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1984) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258247 · Cited by 1,203
Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings across Studies
Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.2307/1175263 · Cited by 792
Hamari, J. (2013) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2013.01.004 · Cited by 741
Self-citationThe effect of virtual achievements on student engagement
Denny, P. C. (2013) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2470763 · Cited by 500
Social Motivations To Use Gamification: An Empirical Study Of Gamifying Exercise
Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2013) · European Conference on Information Systems · Cited by 411
Self-citationSteering user behavior with badges
Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D. P., Kleinberg, J. M., & Leskovec, J. (2013) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2488388.2488398 · Cited by 367
Jung, J. H., Schneider, C., & Valacich, J. S. (2010) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1129 · Cited by 357
Player Types: A Meta-synthesis
Hamari, J., & Tuunanen, J. (2014) · Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association · doi:10.26503/todigra.v1i2.13 · Cited by 355
Self-citationTechnical opinionMotivational affordances
Zhang, P. (2008) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1400214.1400244 · Cited by 354
Game design as marketing: How game mechanics create demand for virtual goods
Hamari, J., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2010) · International journal of business science & applied management. · doi:10.69864/ijbsam.5-1.48 · Cited by 328
Self-citationRemoving gamification from an enterprise SNS
Thom, J., Millen, D. R., & DiMicco, J. M. (2012) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2145204.2145362 · Cited by 283
Results from deploying a participation incentive mechanism within the enterprise
Farzan, R., DiMicco, J. M., Millen, D. R., Dugan, C., Geyer, W., & Brownholtz, E. A. (2008) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1357054.1357145 · Cited by 258
Calibration games: making calibration tasks enjoyable by adding motivating game elements
Flatla, D. R., Gutwin, C., Nacke, L. E., Bateman, S., & Mandryk, R. L. (2011) · Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology · doi:10.1145/2047196.2047248 · Cited by 244
Myths and Realities of Respondent Engagement in Online Surveys
Guin, T. D.-L., Baker, R., Mechling, J., & Ruyle, E. (2012) · International Journal of Market Research · doi:10.2501/ijmr-54-5-613-633 · Cited by 237
Empirical Study on the Effect of Achievement Badges in TRAKLA2 Online Learning Environment
Hakulinen, L., Auvinen, T., & Korhonen, A. (2013) · doi:10.1109/latice.2013.34 · Cited by 228
Li, W., Grossman, T., & Fitzmaurice, G. W. (2012) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/2380116.2380131 · Cited by 223
Framework for Designing and Evaluating Game Achievements
Hamari, J., & Eranti, V. (2011) · doi:10.26503/dl.v2011i1.545 · Cited by 222
Self-citationQuality through flow and immersion
Eickhoff, C., Harris, C. G., de Vries, A. P., & Srinivasan, P. (2012) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/2348283.2348400 · Cited by 190
(2013) · RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) · Cited by 171
Evaldsson, A. (2009) · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-27468-6_22 · Cited by 161
Applying game achievement systems to enhance user experience in a photo sharing service
Montola, M., Nummenmaa, T., Lucero, A., Boberg, M., & Korhonen, H. (2009) · International Academic Mindtrek Conference (Mindtrek) · doi:10.1145/1621841.1621859 · Cited by 157
Fitz-Walter, Z., Tjondronegoro, D., & Wyeth, P. A. (2011) · Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (OzCHI) · doi:10.1145/2071536.2071554 · Cited by 153
Encouraging user behaviour with achievements: An empirical study
Grant, S., & Betts, B. (2013) · International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) · doi:10.1109/msr.2013.6624007 · Cited by 117
Gamification of online idea competitions: insights from an explorative case
Witt, M., Scheiner, C. W., & Robra-Bissantz, S. (2011) · GI-Jahrestagung · Cited by 113
Encouraging user participation in a course recommender system: An impact on user behavior
Farzan, R., & Brusilovsky, P. L. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.005 · Cited by 100
Discovery-based games for learning software
Dong, T., Dontcheva, M., Joseph, D., Karahalios, K. G., Newman, M., & Ackerman, M. S. (2012) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2207676.2208358 · Cited by 94
High Score! - Motivation Strategies for User Participation in Virtual Human Development
Halan, S., Rossen, B., Cendan, J. C., & Lok, B. C. L. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15892-6_52 · Cited by 59
Meta-synthesis of player typologies
Tuunanen, J., & Hamari, J. (2012) · doi:10.26503/dl.v2012i1.604 · Cited by 51
Self-citationGetting a clue: creating student detectives and dragon slayers in your library
Smith, A., & Baker, L. (2011) · Reference Services Review · doi:10.1108/00907321111186659 · Cited by 50
Evaluation of a pervasive game for domestic energy engagement among teenagers
Gustafsson, A., & Bång, M. (2008) · International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE) · doi:10.1145/1501750.1501804 · Cited by 42
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 2011, Gartner Says by 2015 More Than 50 Percent of Organizations that Manage Innovation Processes Will Gamify those Processes
- 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 · DOI · Paper page
- farzan, 2008, When the experiment is over: Deploying an incentive system to all the users, Symposium on Persuasive Technology
- hamari, 2011, Perspectives from behavioral economics to analyzing game design patterns: Loss aversion in social games, The CHI 2011 Social Games Workshop
- deci, 1985, Self-Determination
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2016 update
Afgan, E., Baker, D., van den Beek, M., Blankenberg, D. J., Bouvier, D., Čech, M., Chilton, J. M., Clements, D., Coraor, N., Eberhard, C., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw343 · Cited by 2,150
Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033 · Cited by 2,064
Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019 · Cited by 1,918
The Rise of Motivational Information Systems: A Review of Gamification Research
Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2017) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.013 · Cited by 2,229
Self-citationHamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045 · Cited by 1,713
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H.
- Affiliations
- Tampere University (FI)
- Aalto University (FI)
- Venue
- 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2014-01
- Pages
- 3025-3034
- ISSN
- 1530-1605 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998933811
- Cited by
- 5,201
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 519 · 2025: 675 · 2024: 528 · 2023: 499 · 2022: 396 · 2021: 468 · 2020: 434 · 2019: 418 · 2018: 371 · 2017: 303 · 2016: 249 · 2015: 242 · 2014: 91
- FWCI
- 631.57
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Suomen Kulttuurirahasto (40311/12)
- Tekes (40311/12)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- gamification, motivational affordances, user motivation, psychological outcomes, behavioral effects, context sensitivity, gamification design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
