Cited by 355Digital Games and MediaEducational Games and GamificationSport Psychology and Performance

Player Types: A Meta-synthesis

Open access
Hamari, Juho, Tuunanen, Janne·2014·Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association

Abstract

This paper investigates different ways in which players have been typified in past research literature in order to distinguish relevant typologies for further research as well as for designing and marketing of games. The goal is to synthesize the results of various studies and to find the prevailing concepts, compare them, and draw implications to further studies. The research process for this study proceeded from a literature search, to author-centric (Webster & Watson 2002) identification and categorization of previous works based on the established larger factors such as demographic, psychographic and behavioral variables. The previous works on player typologies were further analyzed using concept-centric approach and synthesized according to common and repeating factors in the previous studies. The results indicate that player types in previous literature can be synthesized into seven primary dimensions: Intensity, Achievement, Exploration, Sociability, Domination, Immersion and In-game demographics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26503/todigra.v1i2.13

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Player typologies can be geographic, demographic, psychographic, or behavioral.

    “These might be geographic, demographic, psychographic or behavioral (Hamari & Tuunanen, 2014, p. 31).”

    From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Hamari & Tuunanen, 2014, p. 31

  • Hamari and Tuunanen (2014) synthesize their findings into five motivations or orientations: achievement, exploration, sociability, domination, and immersion.

    “Hamari and Tuunanen (2014) review the field of player typologies and synthesize their findings into five motivations or orientations: achievement, exploration, sociability, domination and immersion.”

    From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Hamari and Tuunanen, 2014

  • Research into player types did not stop with applications of Bartle's model.

    “Fortunately, research into player types did not stop with applications of Bartle's model.”

    From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Hamari and Tuunanen, 2014

  • Hamari and Tuunanen (2014) review the field of player typologies.

    “Hamari and Tuunanen (2014) review the field of player typologies and synthesize their findings into five motivations or orientations: achievement, exploration, sociability, domination and immersion.”

    From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Hamari and Tuunanen, 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hamari, J. "Perspectives from behavioral economics to analyzing game design patterns: loss aversion in social games." In Proceedings of the Social Games Workshop, CHI2011. Vancouver, Canada, May 7-12, 2011.
  2. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. Marketing Management (Twelfth Edition). NJ: Prentice Hall, 2006.
  3. Lazzaro, N. (2004). "Why We Play Games: Four Keys to More Emo- tion Without Story." In Game Developers Conference. San Jose, USA, March 22-26, 2004.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamari, J., & Tuunanen, J.
Affiliations
  • Tampere University (FI)
  • Aalto University (FI)
Venue
Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association
Published
2014-03-24
Volume
1
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 2328-9414 (ISSN-L)
  • 2328-9422
OpenAlex
W1849401977
Cited by
355
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
77.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association (publishedVersion)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (publishedVersion)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
player types, game design, game marketing, player behavior, player demographics, immersion, achievement motivation, exploration, sociability, domination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review