Cited by 142Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Crafting GBD-Net for Object Detection

Open access
Zeng, Xingyu, Ouyang, Wanli, Yan, Junjie, Li, Hongsheng, Xiao, Tong, Wang, Kun, Liu, Yu, Zhou, Yucong +4 more·2018·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

The visual cues from multiple support regions of different sizes and resolutions are complementary in classifying a candidate box in object detection. Effective integration of local and contextual visual cues from these regions has become a fundamental problem in object detection. In this paper, we propose a gated bi-directional CNN (GBD-Net) to pass messages among features from different support regions during both feature learning and feature extraction. Such message passing can be implemented through convolution between neighboring support regions in two directions and can be conducted in various layers. Therefore, local and contextual visual patterns can validate the existence of each other by learning their nonlinear relationships and their close interactions are modeled in a more complex way. It is also shown that message passing is not always helpful but dependent on individual samples. Gated functions are therefore needed to control message transmission, whose on-or-offs are controlled by extra visual evidence from the input sample. The effectiveness of GBD-Net is shown through experiments on three object detection datasets, ImageNet, Pascal VOC2007 and Microsoft COCO. Besides the GBD-Net, this paper also shows the details of our approach in winning the ImageNet object detection challenge of 2016, with source code provided on https://github.com/craftGBD/craftGBD. In this winning system, the modified GBD-Net, new pretraining scheme and better region proposal designs are provided. We also show the effectiveness of different network structures and existing techniques for object detection, such as multi-scale testing, left-right flip, bounding box voting, NMS, and context.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2017.2745563

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In contrast to the somewhat naive approach of learning CNN features for each region separately and then concatenating them, GBDNet passes messages among features from different contextual regions.

    “In contrast to the somewhat naive approach of learning CNN features for each region separately and then concatenating them, GBDNet passes messages among features from different contextual regions.”

    From Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Survey (2020) · cites this paper as Zeng et al. 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [8][8] Girshick, R.: Fast r-cnn. ICCV (2015) -
  2. [30][30] Bengio, Y., Glorot, X.: Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neuralnetworks. In: AISTATS. (2010) -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeng, X., Ouyang, W., Yan, J., Li, H., Xiao, T., Wang, K., Liu, Y., Zhou, Y., Yang, B., Wang, Z., Zhou, H., & Wang, X.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2018-09-01
Volume
40
Issue
9
Pages
2109-2123
ISSN
  • 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-9292
  • 1939-3539
OpenAlex
W2530966705
Cited by
142
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 13
FWCI
10.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • SenseTime Group Limited
  • Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (CUHK14213616, CUHK14206114, CUHK14205615, CUHK419412, CUHK14203015, CUHK14207814, CUHK14239816)
  • the Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Support Programme (ITS/121/15FX)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61371192)
  • ONR (N00014-15-1-2356)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
object detection, message passing, feature fusion, region proposal, pre-training, non-maximum suppression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review