Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 395

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning to See by Moving

Agrawal, Pulkit, Carreira, Joao, Malik, Jitendra·2015·2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

The current dominant paradigm for feature learning in computer vision relies on training neural networks for the task of object recognition using millions of hand labelled images. Is it also possible to learn features for a diverse set of visual tasks using any other form of supervision? In biology, living organisms developed the ability of visual perception for the purpose of moving and acting in the world. Drawing inspiration from this observation, in this work we investigated if the awareness of egomotion(i.e. self motion) can be used as a supervisory signal for feature learning. As opposed to the knowledge of class labels, information about egomotion is freely available to mobile agents. We found that using the same number of training images, features learnt using egomotion as supervision compare favourably to features learnt using class-label as supervision on the tasks of scene recognition, object recognition, visual odometry and keypoint matching.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv.2015.13

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. simonyan, 2014, Two-stream convolutional networks for action recognition in videos, NIPS, 568
  2. salakhutdinov, 2009, Deep boltzmann machines, AISTATS, 448
  3. ranzato, 2014, Video (language) modeling: a baseline for generative models of natural videos, arXiv preprint arXiv 1412 6604
  4. 10.1162/089976602317318938 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1109/CVPR.2014.13 · DOI
  6. soatto, 2014, Visual scene representations: Sufficiency, minimality, invariance and approximations, arXiv preprint arXiv 1411 7676
  7. fischer, 0, Descriptor matching with convolutional neural networks: a comparison to sift, arXiv preprint arXiv 1405 5769 2014
  8. goroshin, 0, Unsupervised feature learning from temporal data, arXiv preprint arXiv 1504 01039 2015
  9. 10.15607/RSS.2007.III.003 · doi:10.15607/rss.2007.iii.003
  10. 10.1145/2647868.2654889 · DOI · Paper page
  11. bengio, 2012, Unsupervised feature learning and deep learning: A review and new perspectives, CoRR abs/1206 5538
  12. 10.1162/neco.1989.1.3.295 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1007/BF00332918 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1109/CVPR.2007.383157 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1007/978-3-642-15567-3_13 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1109/CVPR.2005.202 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995610 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1109/5.5968 · DOI · Paper page
  19. cutting, 0, Perception with an Eye for Motion, 177
  20. 10.1145/1553374.1553453 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1162/neco.2010.01-09-953 · DOI
  22. oliva, 2006, Building the gist of a scene: The role of global image features in recognition, Progress in Brain Research, 155, 23, 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)55002-2 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Agrawal, P., Carreira, J., & Malik, J.
Venue
2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-12
Pages
37-45
OpenAlex
W1520997877
Cited by
395
References
14
FWCI
17.60
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.