Cited by 483Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesRemote-Sensing Image Classification

Orientation robust object detection in aerial images using deep convolutional neural network

Zhu, Haigang, Chen, Xiaogang, Dai, Weiqun, Fu, Kun, Ye, Qixiang, Jiao, Jianbin·2015·2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)

Abstract

Detecting objects in aerial images is challenged by variance of object colors, aspect ratios, cluttered backgrounds, and in particular, undetermined orientations. In this paper, we propose to use Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN) features from combined layers to perform orientation robust aerial object detection. We explore the inherent characteristics of DC-NN as well as relate the extracted features to the principle of disentangling feature learning. An image segmentation based approach is used to localize ROIs of various aspect ratios, and ROIs are further classified into positives or negatives using an SVM classifier trained on DCNN features. With experiments on two datasets collected from Google Earth, we demonstrate that the proposed aerial object detection approach is simple but effective.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icip.2015.7351502

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most straightforward solution to rotation is to perform data augmentation so that an object in any orientation can be well covered by the augmented data distribution.

    “The most straightforward solution to this problem is to perform data augmentation so that an object in any orientation can be well covered by the augmented data distribution [166]”

    From Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [166]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, H., Chen, X., Dai, W., Fu, K., Ye, Q., & Jiao, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-09
Pages
3735-3739
ISSN
1522-4880 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2296151615
Cited by
483
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.73
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
Keywords
aerial object detection, deep convolutional neural network features, image segmentation, region of interest localization, aspect ratio variation, background clutter, support vector machine classification, Google Earth imagery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review