Cited by 83Wireless Power Transfer SystemsWireless Body Area NetworksInduction Heating and Inverter Technology

A comprehensive comparative study on inductive and ultrasonic wireless power transmission to biomedical implants

Open access
Ibrahim, Ahmed, Meng, Miao, Kiani, Mehdi·2018·IEEE Sensors Journal

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive comparison between inductive coupling and ultrasound for wireless power transmission to biomedical implants. Several sets of inductive and ultrasonic links for different powering distances (d12) and receiver dimensions have been optimized, and their key parameters, including power transmission efficiency (PTE) and power delivered to the load (PDL) within safety constraints, have been compared to find out which method is optimal for any given condition. Two design procedures have been presented for maximizing the PTE of inductive and ultrasonic links by finding the optimal geometry for the transmitter and receiver (Rx) coils and ultrasonic transducers as well as the optimal operation frequency (fp). Our simulation and measurement results showed that the ultrasonic link transcends the inductive link in PTE and somewhat in PDL for a small Rx of 1.1 mm3(diameter of 1.2 mm), particularly when the Rx was deeply implanted inside the tissue (d12≥ 10 mm). However, for a larger 20 mm3Rx (diameter of 5 mm), the inductive link achieved higher PTE and PDL, particularly at shorter distances (d1212, the ultrasonic link is more sensitive to Rx misalignments and orientations. This led us to propose a new design procedure based on the worst-case misalignment scenario. The simulation results have been validated by measurements. The inductive and ultrasonic links, operating at 30 and 1.1 MHz, achieved measured PTEs of 0.05% and 0.65% for the 1.1 mm3Rx located 30 mm inside tissue and oil environments with optimal load resistances of 295 Ω and 3.8 kQ, respectively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jsen.2018.2812420

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For receivers of 1.1 mm3, an ultrasonic link achieved a PTE of 0.65% at an optimal frequency of 1.1 MHz, significantly higher than an inductive link's PTE of 0.05% at 30 MHz.

    “A study revealed that for receivers of 1.1 mm3, the ultrasonic link achieved a Power Transmission Efficiency (PTE) of 0.65% at an optimal frequency of 1.1 MHz, significantly higher than the inductive link’s PTE of 0.05% at 30 MHz.”

    From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Ahmed et al., 2018

    The Measurement Results (Section IV; page unavailable) report a 1.1 mm³ receiver and an optimal ultrasonic frequency of 1.1 MHz, but give its measured PTE as 0.62%, not 0.65%. They report an inductive PTE of 0.053% at 30 MHz, consistent with the claim’s rounded 0.05%; the ultrasonic link’s PTE is substantially higher. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Ultrasonic links have shown superior performance over inductive links in powering small, deeply implanted receivers.

    “Comparatively, ultrasonic links have shown superior performance over inductive links in powering small, deeply implanted receivers.”

    From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Ahmed et al., 2018

  • Ultrasonic links are vulnerable to receiver misalignments and orientations, posing design constraints.

    “However, ultrasonic links are vulnerable to receiver (Rx) misalignments and orientations, posing design constraints.”

    From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Ahmed et al., 2018

  • For larger receivers of 20 mm3 at depths less than 30 mm, inductive links surpass ultrasound in PTE and PDL.

    “For larger receivers of 20 mm3 at depths less than 30 mm, inductive links surpass ultrasound in PTE and PDL (Ahmed et al., 2018).”

    From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Ahmed et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [9]Zhou D Greenbaum E Implantable neural prostheses 1 New York, NY Springer 2009
  2. [24]Agarwal K Jegadeesan R Guo YX Thakor NV Wireless power transfer strategies for implantable bioelectronics IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 10 136 161 2017 28328511
  3. [35]IEEE standard for the safety levels with respect to human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, 3 KHz to 300 GHz IEEE Standard C95.1 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ibrahim, A., Meng, M., & Kiani, M.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
IEEE Sensors Journal
Published
2018-05-01
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
3813-3826
ISSN
  • 1530-437X (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-1748
  • 2379-9153
OpenAlex
W2797024751
Cited by
83
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Sensors Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (NIBIB-1U18EB021789-01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Power Transfer Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Induction Heating and Inverter Technology
Keywords
wireless power transfer, biomedical implants, inductive coupling, ultrasonic power transfer, power transfer efficiency, receiver misalignment, receiver geometry optimization, operating frequency optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review