Cited by 1,695Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignLow-power high-performance VLSI design

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A low-power low-noise cmos for amplifier neural recording applications

Harrison, R.R., Charles, C.·2003·IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits

Abstract

There is a need among scientists and clinicians for low-noise low-power biosignal amplifiers capable of amplifying signals in the millihertz-to-kilohertz range while rejecting large dc offsets generated at the electrode-tissue interface. The advent of fully implantable multielectrode arrays has created the need for fully integrated micropower amplifiers. We designed and tested a novel bioamplifier that uses a MOS-bipolar pseudoresistor element to amplify low-frequency signals down to the millihertz range while rejecting large dc offsets. We derive the theoretical noise-power tradeoff limit - the noise efficiency factor - for this amplifier and demonstrate that our VLSI implementation approaches this limit by selectively operating MOS transistors in either weak or strong inversion. The resulting amplifier, built in a standard 1.5-μm CMOS process, passes signals from 0.025Hz to 7.2 kHz with an input-referred noise of 2.2 μVrms and a power dissipation of 80 μW while consuming 0.16 mm2of chip area. Our design technique was also used to develop an electroencephalogram amplifier having a bandwidth of 30 Hz and a power dissipation of 0.9 μW while maintaining a similar noise-power tradeoff.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jssc.2003.811979

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 33 references

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dagtekin, A multichannel chopper modulated neural recording system, 757

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 1,001–1,002 of 1,002

Metadata

Authors
Harrison, R. R., & Charles, C.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits
Published
2003-06
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
958-965
ISSN
0018-9200 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159318368
Cited by
1,695
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 90 · 2014: 85 · 2013: 80 · 2012: 82
FWCI
24.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
Keywords
neural recording, DC offset rejection, noise efficiency factor, weak and strong inversion, VLSI design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review