Cited by 48Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design

Bidirectional Peripheral Nerve Interface With 64 Second-Order Opamp-Less ΔΣ ADCs and Fully Integrated Wireless Power/Data Transmission

ElAnsary, Maged, Xu, Jianxiong, Filho, Jose Sales, Dutta, Gairik, Long, Liam, Tejeiro, Camilo, Shoukry, Aly, Tang, Chenxi +7 more·2021·IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits

Abstract

An active probe and microstimulator SoC for interfacing with peripheral nerves is presented. It performs 64-channel artifact-tolerant neural recording, cuff imbalance compensation by impedance sensing, and neurostimulation for the closed-loop operation. Each recording channel is a second-order opamp-less$\Delta \Sigma $ADC that consumes 140 nW and occupies 0.01 mm2area in 130 nm CMOS. The single-loop$\Delta \Sigma $architecture achieves second-order noise shaping with two passive integrators. To the best of our knowledge, this yields the lowest power and area of any second-order$\Delta \Sigma $ADC and the lowest FOM (fJ/conv. step) of any passive second-order$\Delta \Sigma $ADC (27 fJ/conv. step). The SoC uniquely performs multi-modal input signal recording: voltage (for neural recording) and current (for impedance sensing) are measured concurrently using frequency multiplexing. The SoC also features a 60 MHz energy-efficient inductive powering link and a 600 MHz RF data communication link. The prototype is validatedin vivoin the rat sciatic nerve for electroneurogram (ENG) sensing and the correction of impedance-imbalance in cuff electrodes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jssc.2021.3113354

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recording circuits developed for the PNS have strict requirements of noise cancellation due to the proximity of sources of biosignal interference including electromyogram and electrocardiogram which are orders of magnitude larger than the signals of interest.

    “Recording circuits developed for the PNS have strict requirements of noise cancellation due to the proximity of sources of biosignal interference including electromyogram and electrocardiogram which are orders of magnitude larger than the signals of interest [54].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ElAnsary, M., Xu, J., Filho, J. S., Dutta, G., Long, L., Tejeiro, C., Shoukry, A., Tang, C., Kilinc, E., Joshi, J., Sabetian, P., Unger, S., Zariffa, J., Yoo, P., & Genov, R.
Affiliations
  • Ain Shams University (EG)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits
Published
2021-11
Volume
56
Issue
11
Pages
3247-3262
ISSN
  • 0018-9200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-173X
OpenAlex
W3204012403
Cited by
48
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  • Canada Foundation for Innovation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Keywords
peripheral nerve interfaces, neural recording, neurostimulation, low-power analog-to-digital converter, inductive power transfer, RF data transmission, electroneurogram, rat sciatic nerve, frequency multiplexing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review