Cited by 372Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityInternet of Things and AIIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

Blockchain for IoT-based healthcare: background, consensus, platforms, and use cases

Ray, Partha Pratim, Dash, Dinesh, Salah, Khaled, Kumar, Neeraj·2021·IEEE Systems Journal

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) and blockchain technologies are being heavily exploited and used in may domains, especially for e-healthcare. In healthcare, IoT devices have the ability to provide real-time sensory data from patients to be processed and analyzed. Collected IoT data are subjected to centralized computation, processing, and storage. Such centralization can be problematic, as it can be a single point of failure, mistrust, data manipulation and tampering, and privacy evasion. Blockchain can solve such serious problems by providing decentralized computation and storage for IoT data. Therefore, the integration IoT and blockchain technologies can become a reasonable choice for the design of a decentralized IoT-based e-healthcare systems. In this article, first, we give a brief background on blockchain. Second, popular consensus algorithms used in blockchain are discussed in the context of e-health. Third, blockchain platforms are reviewed for their appropriateness in IoT-based e-healthcare. Finally, few use cases are methodologically given to show how key features of the IoT and blockchain can be leveraged to support healthcare services and ecosystems. We also propose a data-flow architecture that combines the IoT with blockchain, called IoBHealth, that can be used for storing, accessing, and managing of e-healthcare data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jsyst.2020.2963840

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Blockchain's peer-to-peer architecture is regarded as a possible solution to problems with a single point of failure and bottleneck.

    “The blockchain's peer to peer (P2P) architecture is regarded as a possible solution to problems with a single point of failure and bottleneck [11,12].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ray, P. P., Dash, D., Salah, K., & Kumar, N.
Affiliations
  • Sikkim University (IN)
  • National Institute of Technology Patna (IN)
  • Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
  • Asia University (TW)
Venue
IEEE Systems Journal
Published
2021-03
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
85-94
ISSN
  • 1932-8184 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-9234
  • 2373-7816
OpenAlex
W3002652184
Cited by
372
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 9
FWCI
55.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Systems Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
blockchain, Internet of Things, e-health, consensus algorithms, blockchain platforms, decentralized storage, data privacy, health data management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review