Cited by 243Millimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingElectromagnetic Fields and Biological EffectsMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Safe for Generations to Come: Considerations of Safety for Millimeter Waves in Wireless Communications

Open access

Abstract

With the increasing demand for higher data rates and more reliable service capabilities for wireless devices, wireless service providers are facing an unprecedented challenge to overcome a global bandwidth shortage. Early global activities on beyond fourth-generation (B4G) and fifth-generation (5G) wireless communication systems suggest that millimeter-wave (mmWave) frequencies are very promising for future wireless communication networks due to the massive amount of raw bandwidth and potential multigigabit-per-second (Gb/s) data rates [1]?[3]. Both industry and academia have begun the exploration of the untapped mmWave frequency spectrum for future broadband mobile communication networks. In April 2014, the Brooklyn 5G Summit [4], sponsored by Nokia and the New York University (NYU) WIRELESS research center, drew global attention to mmWave communications and channel modeling. In July 2014, the IEEE 802.11 next-generation 60-GHz study group was formed to increase the data rates to over 20 Gb/s in the unlicensed 60-GHz frequency band while maintaining backward compatibility with the emerging IEEE 802.11ad wireless local area network (WLAN) standard [5].

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mmm.2014.2377587

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 98 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 2014, Standards
  2. chiang, 2014, Rationale for setting EMF exposure standards
  3. 2014, Standards & Guidelines
  4. 2014, Establishment of exposure limits attention values and quality goals to protect the population against electric magnetic and electromagnetic fields generated at frequencies between 100 kHz and 300 GHz
  5. 0, EMF policy facts: Switzerland, Second Mobile Communications Seminar
  6. 2014, Ordinance relating to protection from non-ionising radiation
  7. 0, Evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields
  8. 2014, The Brooklyn 5G Summit
  9. 2014, Status of IEEE 802 11 HEW Study Group
  10. 1992, IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagetic Fields 3 kHz to 300 GHz
  11. 1986, Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields
  12. 2001, Evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields
  13. hasgall, 2014, IT'IS Database for Thermal and Electromagnetic Parameters of Biological Tissues
  14. andreuccetti, 1996, An Internet Resource for the Calculation of the Dielectric Properties of Body Tissues in the Frequency Range 10 Hz–100 GHz
  15. 2010, Particular Requirements for the Basic Safety and Essential Performance of Magnetic Resonance Equipment for Medical Diagnosis
  16. 2005, IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagetic Fields 3 kHz to 300 GHz
  17. khan, 0, Dual band and diverse radiation pattern antenna for power efficient and reliable on-body and off-body communications for healthcare applications, Proc IEEE Int Symp Antennas Propagation, 396
  18. 1998, Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz), Health Phys, 74, 494
  19. 1996, Guidelines for evaluating the environmental effects of radiofrequency radiation
  20. 2014, Wireless devices and health concerns
  21. 2014, Electromagnetic Fields and Public Health Mobile Phones
  22. lebedeva, 0, Application of low intensity millimeter waves in medicine, BEMS 17th Annual Meeting, 14

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wu, T., Rappaport, T. S., & Collins, C. M.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
Venue
IEEE Microwave Magazine
Published
2015-03
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
65-84
ISSN
1527-3342 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029468290
Cited by
243
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 3
FWCI
10.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Microwave Magazine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (P41EB017183)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Microwave Engineering and Waveguides
Keywords
millimeter-wave communication, 60 GHz, IEEE 802.11ad, 5G, unlicensed spectrum, wireless local area networks, data rate requirements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review