Cited by 511Diabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Management and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 305 of the 305 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diabetes: Models, Signals, and Control

Open access
Cobelli, C., Dalla Man, C., Sparacino, G., Magni, L., De Nicolao, G., Kovatchev, B.P.·2009·IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

The control of diabetes is an interdisciplinary endeavor, which includes a significant biomedical engineering component, with traditions of success beginning in the early 1960s. It began with modeling of the insulin-glucose system, and progressed to large-scale in silico experiments, and automated closed-loop control (artificial pancreas). Here, we follow these engineering efforts through the last, almost 50 years. We begin with the now classic minimal modeling approach and discuss a number of subsequent models, which have recently resulted in the first in silico simulation model accepted as substitute to animal trials in the quest for optimal diabetes control. We then review metabolic monitoring, with a particular emphasis on the new continuous glucose sensors, on the analyses of their time-series signals, and on the opportunities that they present for automation of diabetes control. Finally, we review control strategies that have been successfully employed in vivo or in silico, presenting a promise for the development of a future artificial pancreas and, in particular, discuss a modular architecture for building closed-loop control systems, including insulin delivery and patient safety supervision layers. We conclude with a brief discussion of the unique interactions between human physiology, behavioral events, engineering modeling and control relevant to diabetes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/rbme.2009.2036073

Cites

305 of 305 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 304 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1210/jc.80.1.28 · DOI
  2. 10.1210/jc.81.10.3746 · DOI
  3. patek, 2007, Adaptive meal detection algorithm enabling closed-loop control in type 1 diabetes, Proc Diabetes Technology Meeting
  4. 10.1210/jc.82.12.4088 · DOI
  5. 10.1210/jc.84.6.1938 · DOI
  6. bassingthwaighte, 1984, Handbook of Physiology The Cardiovascular System Microcirculation
  7. utriainen, 1998, Lumped constant for [14C]deoxy-D-glucose in human skeletal muscle, Diabetologia, 41, 187a
  8. palerm, 2005, Hypoglycemia prediction and detection using optimal estimation, Diabetes Technol Therapeutics, 7, 3, 10.1089/dia.2005.7.3 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/193229680700100505 · DOI
  10. dalla man, 2009, A pre & type 2 diabetes simulator for in silico trials, Proc Ninth Diabetes Technology Meeting
  11. pickup, 1991, Textbook of Diabetes, 2
  12. denti, 2009, A nonlinear mixed-effects approach to the estimation of the glucose disposition index, Proc PAGE 2009 Meeting
  13. toffolo, 2001, Quantitative indexes of beta-cell function during graded up&down glucose infusion from C-peptide minimal models, Amer J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, 280, 2e, 10.1152/ajpendo.2001.280.1.E2 · DOI · Paper page
  14. patek, 2009, Control of hypoglycemia via estimation of active insulin, glucose forecasts, and risk-based insulin reduction, Proc 2nd Advanced Technol Treatment for Diabetes
  15. 2009, Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Towards New Challenging Applications, 384

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 509

Metadata

Authors
Cobelli, C., Dalla Man, C., Sparacino, G., Magni, L., De Nicolao, G., & Kovatchev, B. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Venue
IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
Published
2009
Volume
2
Pages
54-96
ISSN
  • 1937-3333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-1189
OpenAlex
W2171613573
Cited by
511
References
304
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 43
FWCI
24.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01dk051562-23)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01-DK-051562)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
diabetes management, computer simulation, artificial pancreas, feedback control, continuous glucose monitoring, modular control architecture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review