Cited by 49Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing

Compact, Energy-Efficient High-Frequency Switched Capacitor Neural Stimulator With Active Charge Balancing

Open access
Hsu, Wen-Yang, Schmid, Alexandre·2017·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems

Abstract

Safety and energy efficiency are two major concerns for implantable neural stimulators. This paper presents a novel high-frequency, switched capacitor (HFSC) stimulation and active charge balancing scheme, which achieves high energy efficiency and well-controlled stimulation charge in the presence of large electrode impedance variations. Furthermore, the HFSC can be implemented in a compact size without any external component to simultaneously enable multichannel stimulation by deploying multiple stimulators. The theoretical analysis shows significant benefits over the constant-current and voltage-mode stimulation methods. The proposed solution was fabricated using a 0.18 μm high-voltage technology, and occupies only 0.035 mm2for a single stimulator. The measurement result shows 50% peak energy efficiency and confirms the effectiveness of active charge balancing to prevent the electrode dissolution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbcas.2017.2694144

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-frequency switched-capacitor stimulating systems have demonstrated the feasibility of integrating smaller capacitors to achieve superior energy efficiency with charge-driven stimulators while maintaining the required level of safety.

    “Highfrequency switched-capacitor stimulating systems (Fig. 5(d)) have demonstrated the feasibility of integrating smaller capacitors to achieve superior energy efficiency with chargedriven stimulators while maintaining the required level of safety [123], [142].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hsu, W.-Y., & Schmid, A.
Affiliations
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems
Published
2017-08
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
878-888
ISSN
  • 1932-4545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-9990
OpenAlex
W2735171681
Cited by
49
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation (16227.1 PFLS-LS)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
Keywords
neural stimulator, switched capacitor, high-frequency stimulation, energy efficiency, biomedical implants, multichannel stimulation, electrode dissolution, constant current stimulation, compact integrated circuit
MeSH terms
Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Equipment Design, Humans, Electric Impedance, Implantable Neurostimulators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review