Cited by 168Spam and Phishing DetectionMisinformation and Its ImpactsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Twitter Bot Detection Using Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Neural Networks and Word Embeddings

Open access
Wei, Feng, Nguyen, Uyen Trang·2019·2019 First IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA)

Abstract

Twitter is a web application playing dual roles of online social networking and micro-blogging. The popularity and open structure of Twitter have attracted a large number of automated programs, known as bots. Legitimate bots generate a large amount of benign contextual content, i.e., tweets delivering news and updating feeds, while malicious bots spread spam or malicious contents. To assist human users in identifying who they are interacting with, this paper focuses on the classification of human and spambot accounts on Twitter, by employing recurrent neural networks, specifically bidirectional Long Short-term Memory (BiLSTM), to efficiently capture features across tweets. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first that develops a recurrent neural model with word embeddings to distinguish Twitter bots from human accounts, that requires no prior knowledge or assumption about users' profiles, friendship networks, or historical behavior on the target account. Moreover, our model does not require any handcrafted features. The preliminary simulation results are very encouraging. Experiments on the cresci-2017 dataset show that our approach can achieve competitive performance compared with existing state-of-the-art bot detection systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tps-isa48467.2019.00021

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Integrating models such as BERT or LSTM would have necessitated substantial changes to the data preprocessing pipeline and model architecture, diverging from the study's focus on metadata-based fake profile detection.

    “Additionally, integrating models such as BERT or LSTM would have necessitated substantial changes to the data preprocessing pipeline and model architecture, diverging from the study’s focus on metadata-based fake profile detection.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wei, F., & Nguyen, U. T.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Venue
2019 First IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-12
Pages
101-109
OpenAlex
W3010115535
Cited by
168
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 5
FWCI
9.36
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
Twitter bot detection, human vs bot classification, bidirectional LSTM, word embeddings, recurrent neural networks, social bots

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review