Cited by 596Psychology of Social InfluenceSocial and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status Dynamics

Gender and Social Influence

Carli, Linda L.·2001·Journal of Social Issues

Abstract

This review article reveals that men are generally more influential than women, although the gender difference depends on several moderators. Relative to men, women are particularly less influential when using dominant forms of communication, whereas the male advantage in influence is reduced in domains that are traditionally associated with the female role and in group settings in which more than one woman or girl is present. Males in particular resist influence by women and girls more than females do, especially when influence agents employ highly competent styles of communication. Resistance to competent women can be reduced, however, when women temper their competence with displays of communality and warmth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/0022-4537.00238

Cites

131 of 131 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carli, L. L.
Affiliations
Wellesley College (US)
Corresponding author
Carli, Linda L.
Venue
Journal of Social Issues
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-01
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
725-741
ISSN
  • 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4560
OpenAlex
W2047305705
Cited by
596
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 25
FWCI
34.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
social influence, women's influence, resistance to influence, communication competence, gender roles, group settings, communality, warmth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review