The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mere Exposure: A Gateway to the Subliminal
Abstract
In the mere-repeated-exposure paradigm, an individual is repeatedly exposed to a particular stimulus object, and the researcher records the individual's emerging preference for that object. Vast literature on the mere-repeated-exposure effect shows it to be a robust phenomenon that cannot be explained by an appeal to recognition memory or perceptual fluency. The effect has been demonstrated across cultures, species, and diverse stimulus domains. It has been obtained even when the stimuli exposed are not accessible to the participants’ awareness, and even prenatally. The repeated-exposure paradigm can be regarded as a form of classical conditioning if we assume that the absence of aversive events constitutes the unconditioned stimulus. Empirical research shows that a benign experience of repetition can in and of itself enhance positive affect, and that such affect can become attached not only to stimuli that have been exposed but also to similar stimuli that have not been previously exposed, and to totally distinct stimuli as well. Implications for affect as a fundamental and independent process are discussed in the light of neuroanatomical evidence.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Also, of importance is the mere exposure effect [56]. The mere exposure effect describes that the more often you are exposed to a certain (neutral) thing or application (here a game), the more you like it. This has even been shown for the initials of your name (for an introduction in the initial preference task, e.g., see Sariyska et al. [57]) and seems to be applicable also for many of the gaming”
From Addictive Features of Social Media/Messenger Platforms and Freemium Games against the Background of Psychological and Economic Theories (2019) · cites this paper as [56]
Citations
Cites
Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151 · Cited by 8,094
Self-citationAttitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure
Zajonc, R. B. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025848 · Cited by 6,745
Self-citationCognition and motivation in emotion.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.46.4.352 · Cited by 2,096
Discrimination and learning without awareness: A methodological survey and evaluation.
Eriksen, C. W. (1960) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0041622 · Cited by 660
Subliminal Mere Exposure: Specific, General, and Diffuse Effects
Monahan, J. L., Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (2000) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00289 · Cited by 394
Zola‐Morgan, S., Squire, L. R., Clower, R. P., & Alvarez‐Royo, P. (1991) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.450010208 · Cited by 265
Additivity of nonconscious affect: Combined effects of priming and exposure.
Murphy, S. T., Monahan, J. L., & Zajonc, R. B. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.589 · Cited by 245
Feeling more than we can know: Exposure effects without learning.
Wilson, W. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.811 · Cited by 233
Elliott, R., & Dolan, R. J. (1998) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-12-04697.1998 · Cited by 132
TAYLOR, K. F., & Sluckin, W. (1964) · Nature · doi:10.1038/201108a0 · Cited by 76
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- LeDoux J., 1996, The emotional brain.
- 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.589 · DOI
- Zajonc R.B., 2000, Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition, 31
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,001
Kapoor, K., Kumar, V., Terveen, L., Konstan, J. A., & Schrater, P. (2015) · ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys) · doi:10.1145/2792838.2800172 · Cited by 117
Pechey, R., Cartwright, E., Pilling, M. A., Hollands, G. J., Vasiljevic, M., Jebb, S. A., & Marteau, T. M. (2018) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.11.013 · Cited by 116
Socially-mediated syntactic alignment
Weatherholtz, K., Campbell‐Kibler, K., & Jaeger, T. F. (2014) · Language Variation and Change · doi:10.1017/s0954394514000155 · Cited by 116
Laban, G., Kappas, A., Morrison, V., & Cross, E. S. (2024) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-023-01076-z · Cited by 119
Psychology of Human Kin Recognition: Heuristic Cues, Erroneous Inferences, and Their Implications
Park, J. H., Schaller, M., & van Vugt, M. (2008) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.12.3.215 · Cited by 118
What makes fashion consumers “click”? Generation of eWoM engagement in social media
Ananda, A. S., Hernández-García, Á., Acquila-Natale, E., & Lamberti, L. (2019) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-03-2018-0115 · Cited by 136
Acker, M. (2009) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9655-z · Cited by 110
Masurovsky, A., Chojecki, P., Runde, D., Lafci, M., Przewozny, D., & Gaebler, M. (2020) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti4040091 · Cited by 111
Changing Behavior Using the Health Action Process Approach
Schwarzer, R., & Hamilton, K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.007 · Cited by 114
de Boer, A., Pijl, S. J., Minnaert, A. E. M. G., & Post, W. J. (2013) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1908-6 · Cited by 106
Infants relax in response to unfamiliar foreign lullabies
Bainbridge, C. M., Bertolo, M., Youngers, J., Atwood, S., Yurdum, L., Simson, J., Lopez, K. L., Xing, F., Martin, A., & Mehr, S. A. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-00963-z · Cited by 107
How Advergame Content Influences Explicit and Implicit Brand Attitudes: When Violence Spills Over
Waiguny, M. K. J., Nelson, M. R., & Marko, B. (2013) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2013.774590 · Cited by 113
Changes in liking for a no added salt soup as a function of exposure
Methven, L., Langreney, E., & Prescott, J. (2012) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.04.012 · Cited by 108
A Two-Dimensional Model for the Study of Interpersonal Attraction
Montoya, R. M., & Horton, R. S. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868313501887 · Cited by 116
The Influence of Affect on Attitude
Clore, G. L., & Schnall, S. (2005) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.4324/9781315178103-6 · Cited by 108
Bright, J., Hale, S., Ganesh, B., Bulovsky, A., Margetts, H., & Howard, P. (2020) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650219872394 · Cited by 104
The Role of Awareness in Attitude Formation Through Evaluative Conditioning
Sweldens, S., Corneille, O., & Yzerbyt, V. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868314527832 · Cited by 130
Madison, G., & Schiölde, G. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00147 · Cited by 123
Trust-building strategies in corporate discourse: An experimental study
Fuoli, M., & Hart, C. (2018) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926518770264 · Cited by 115
Raymond, J. E., Fenske, M. J., & Westoby, N. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1404 · Cited by 109
Textures that we like to touch: An experimental study of aesthetic preferences for tactile stimuli
Etzi, R., Spence, C. J., & Gallace, A. (2014) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.08.011 · Cited by 110
Little, A. C. (2014) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1316 · Cited by 110
Challenged Expectations: Mere Exposure Effects on Attitudes About Transgender People and Rights
Flores, A. R., Haider‐Markel, D. P., Lewis, D. C., Miller, P., Tadlock, B. L., & Taylor, J. K. (2017) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12402 · Cited by 109
Novelty and Inductive Generalization in Human Reinforcement Learning
Gershman, S. J., & Niv, Y. (2015) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12138 · Cited by 99
Subliminal perception and its cognates: Theory, indeterminacy, and time
Erdelyi, M. H. (2003) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/s1053-8100(03)00051-5 · Cited by 97
Oishi, S., & Talhelm, T. (2012) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721412460675 · Cited by 98
Esposito, G., Nakazawa, J., Ogawa, S., Stival, R., Kawashima, A., Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106705 · Cited by 99
Speech vs. singing: infants choose happier sounds
Corbeil, M., Trehub, S. E., & Peretz, I. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00372 · Cited by 97
Aesthetic preference recognition of 3D shapes using EEG
Chew, L. H., Teo, J., & Mountstephens, J. (2015) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-015-9363-z · Cited by 98
Pronouns Beyond the Binary: The Change of Attitudes and Use Over Time
Sendén, M. G., Renström, E. A., & Lindqvist, A. L. (2021) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/08912432211029226 · Cited by 99
Investigating Italian disinformation spreading on Twitter in the context of 2019 European elections
Pierri, F., Artoni, A., & Ceri, S. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227821 · Cited by 93
Costa, D. S. J., Mercieca‐Bebber, R., Tesson, S., Seidler, Z. E., & Lopez, A.-L. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025166 · Cited by 118
Stallen, M., Smidts, A., Rijpkema, M., Smit, G., Klucharev, V. A., & Fernández, G. (2010) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2010.03.006 · Cited by 94
Albarracín, D., & Vargas, P. T. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001011 · Cited by 94
Forming attitudes via neural activity supporting affective episodic simulations
Benoit, R. G., Paulus, P. C., & Schacter, D. L. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09961-w · Cited by 95
Backlund, E. A., & Williams, D. R. (2004) · Cited by 88
Associative Attitude Learning: A Closer Look at Evidence and How It Relates to Attitude Models
Corneille, O., & Stahl, C. (2019) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868318763261 · Cited by 129
Learning and Liking an Artificial Musical System: Effects of Set Size and Repeated Exposure
Loui, P., & Wessel, D. L. (2008) · Musicae Scientiae · doi:10.1177/102986490801200202 · Cited by 93
Hing, N., Russell, A. M. T., Lamont, M., & Vitartas, P. (2017) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-017-9671-9 · Cited by 87
Niehm, L. S., Fiore, A. M., Jeong, M., & Kim, H. (2006) · Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) · Cited by 86
Interactions of attention, emotion and motivation
Raymond, J. E. (2009) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(09)17617-3 · Cited by 84
When Do People Want AI to Make Decisions?
Kramer, M. F., Schaich Borg, J., Conitzer, V., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3278721.3278752 · Cited by 83
Fletcher, L., & Carruthers, P. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0413 · Cited by 83
Hing, N., Lamont, M., Vitartas, P., & Fink, E. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.003 · Cited by 82
Happiness Cools the Warm Glow of Familiarity
de Vries, M., Holland, R. W., Chenier, T., Starr, M. J., & Winkielman, P. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797609359878 · Cited by 91
The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search
Fenske, M. J., Raymond, J. E., & Kunar, M. A. (2004) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196736 · Cited by 80
Stimulus collative properties and consumers’ flavor preferences☆
Giacalone, D., Duerlund, M., Bøegh-Petersen, J., Bredie, W. L. P., & Frøst, M. B. (2014) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.007 · Cited by 79
Mere exposure affects perceived descriptive norms: Implications for personal preferences and trust
Kwan, L. Y. ‐., Yap, S., & Chiu, C. (2015) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.12.002 · Cited by 78
Emotional Expressions of Young Infants and Children
Sullivan, M. W., & Lewis, M. (2003) · Infants & Young Children · doi:10.1097/00001163-200304000-00005 · Cited by 78
Cognitive Mechanisms for Explaining Dynamics of Aesthetic Appreciation
Carbon, C. (2011) · i-Perception · doi:10.1068/i0463aap · Cited by 77
The psychology of psychic distance: Antecedents of asymmetric perceptions
Håkanson, L., Ambos, B., Schuster, A., & Leicht‐Deobald, U. (2015) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2015.11.005 · Cited by 76
Nikulina, V., Gelin, M., & Zwilling, A. L. (2017) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260517741626 · Cited by 75
Natural places: Perceptions of wildness and attachment to local greenspace
Colley, K., & Craig, T. P. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.12.007 · Cited by 76
Types of Embodiment in Design: The Embodied Foundations of Meaning and Affect in Product Design
van Rompay, T. J. L., & Ludden, G. (2015) · University of Twente Research Information · Cited by 76
Johansson, P., Hall, L., Tärning, B., Sikström, S., & Chater, N. (2013) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1807 · Cited by 85
Novelty vs. Familiarity Principles in Preference Decisions: Task-Context of Past Experience Matters
Liao, H., Yeh, S., & Shinsuke Shimojo, A. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00043 · Cited by 75
Buunk, A. P., & Dijkstra, P. (2011) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20421 · Cited by 75
Shared musical knowledge in 11‐month‐old infants
Mehr, S. A., & Spelke, E. S. (2017) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12542 · Cited by 74
Mere Exposure and the Endowment Effect on Consumer Decision Making
Tom, G., Nelson, C., Srzentic, T., & King, R. (2007) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.3200/jrlp.141.2.117-126 · Cited by 74
Lahdelma, I., & Eerola, T. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-65615-8 · Cited by 83
Emotion, affect, and risk communication with older adults: challenges and opportunities
Finucane, M. L. (2008) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669870802261595 · Cited by 71
Odor hedonics and their modulators
Rouby, C., Pouliot, S., & Bensafi, M. (2009) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.05.004 · Cited by 86
Laboratory Experiments in Political Science
Iyengar, S. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511921452.006 · Cited by 71
Hurtado, E., Andrés Haye, M., González, R., Manes, F. F., & Ibáñez, A. M. (2009) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-69 · Cited by 69
Stephens, K., & Rains, S. A. (2011) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650210362679 · Cited by 65
Gardner, B., Rebar, A. L., & Lally, P. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.041 · Cited by 73
Peer status and classroom seating arrangements: A social relations analysis
van den Berg, Y. H. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.09.007 · Cited by 78
Trust in the European Union: Effects of the information environment
Brosius, A., van Elsas, E., & de Vreese, C. H. (2018) · European Journal of Communication · doi:10.1177/0267323118810843 · Cited by 66
Case, L., Schram, B. M., Jung, J., Leung, W. C. W., & Yun, J. (2020) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2020.1727575 · Cited by 66
A Model for Haptic Aesthetic Processing and Its Implications for Design
Carbon, C., & Jakesch, M. (2012) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2012.2219831 · Cited by 70
Winkielman, P., & Gogolushko, Y. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02261 · Cited by 69
Lynn, M., Flynn, S. M., & Helion, C. (2013) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2013.01.010 · Cited by 64
The Relation Between Preference for Predictability and Autistic Traits
Goris, J., Braß, M., Cambier, C., Delplanque, J., Wiersema, J. R., & Braem, S. (2019) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.2244 · Cited by 74
Garcini, L., Arredondo, M. M., Berry, O. O., Church, J. A., Fryberg, S. A., Thomason, M., & McLaughlin, K. (2022) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101167 · Cited by 49
Kiss, M., Raymond, J. E., Westoby, N., Nobre, A. C., & Eimer, M. (2008) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.09.013.2008 · Cited by 62
McDougall, S. J. P., Reppa, I., Kulik, J., & Taylor, A. (2016) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.02.006 · Cited by 68
Finkel, E. J., Norton, M. I., Reis, H. T., Dan Ariely, C., Caprariello, P. A., Eastwick, P. W., Frost, J. H., & Maniaci, M. R. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614561682 · Cited by 68
The Social Side of School: Why Teachers Need Social Psychology
Gehlbach, H. (2010) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9138-3 · Cited by 69
Thought Speed, Mood, and the Experience of Mental Motion
Pronin, E., & Jacobs, E. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00091.x · Cited by 67
Food Neophobia and Sensation Seeking
Alley, T. R., & Potter, K. A. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-92271-3_47 · Cited by 61
Thought for food: Cognitive influences on chemosensory perceptions and preferences
White, T. L., Thomas‐Danguin, T., Olofsson, J., Zucco, G. M., & Prescott, J. (2019) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103776 · Cited by 66
Facial attractiveness: General patterns of facial preferences
Kościński, K. (2007) · Anthropological Review · doi:10.2478/v10044-008-0001-9 · Cited by 63
Changing Behavior Using Social Cognitive Theory
Łuszczyńska, A., & Schwarzer, R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.003 · Cited by 81
Arousal, valence, and the uncanny valley: psychophysiological and self-report findings
Cheetham, M., Wu, L.-D., Pauli, P., & Jäncke, L. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00981 · Cited by 64
Zhang, X., & Yuan, S. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2802206 · Cited by 62
Do People Have Reproductive Goals? Constructive Preferences and the Discovery of Desired Family Size
Bhrolcháin, M. N., & Beaujouan, É. (2019) · The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93227-9_3 · Cited by 59
To buy or not to buy? Predicting willingness to pay for automated vehicles based on public opinion
Cunningham, M. L., Regan, M., Ledger, S. A., & Bennett, J. M. (2019) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.012 · Cited by 60
Meta-Cognitive Myopia and the Dilemmas of Inductive-Statistical Inference
Fiedler, K. (2012) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394293-7.00001-7 · Cited by 66
South, M., Ozonoff, S. J., Suchy, Y., Kesner, R. P., McMahon, W. M., & Lainhart, J. E. (2007) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617708080107 · Cited by 62
Making Sense of Conflicting Science Information
Novin, A., & Meyers, E. (2017) · Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3020165.3020185 · Cited by 58
Rioux, C., Lafraire, J., & Picard, D. (2017) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.08.016 · Cited by 58
The evaluative information ecology: On the frequency and diversity of “good” and “bad”
Unkelbach, C., Koch, A. S., & Alves, H. (2019) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2019.1688474 · Cited by 65
Steinmann, S., Mau, G., & Schramm‐Klein, H. (2015) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20784 · Cited by 69
Walker, J. N., & Scior, K. (2013) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.03.024 · Cited by 57
Munniksma, A., Scheepers, P. L. H., Stark, T., & Tolsma, J. (2016) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/jora.12248 · Cited by 57
Recognising what you like: Examining the relation between the mere-exposure effect and recognition
Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2006) · The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440500487454 · Cited by 60
Lahdelma, I., Athanasopoulos, G., & Eerola, T. (2021) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14655 · Cited by 56
Berger, J., Essah, E., Blanuša, T., & Beaman, C. P. (2022) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109151 · Cited by 56
Collaud, R., Reppa, I., Défayes, L., McDougall, S. J. P., Henchoz, N., & Sonderegger, A. (2022) · Displays · doi:10.1016/j.displa.2022.102290 · Cited by 56
Testing the Effects of Incidental Advertising Exposure in Online Gaming Environment
Acar, A. (2007) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2007.10722136 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Zajonc, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zajonc, R.B.
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 224-228
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- OpenAlex
- W2143046471
- Cited by
- 1,299
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 157 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 46
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- mere exposure effect, subliminal perception, preference formation, classical conditioning, positive affect, emotional attachment, unconscious awareness, prenatal exposure, recognition memory, perceptual fluency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review