Cited by 74Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

School context and genetic influences on aggression in adolescence

Rowe, David C., Almeida, David M., Jacobson, Kristen C.·1999·Psychological Science

Abstract

Genetic and environmental contributions to variation in aggression were examined using adolescents' self-reports of aggressive behavior. The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health provided a sample of 1,515 pairs of adolescents in five genetically informative groups (i.e., monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins, full siblings, half siblings, and unrelated siblings reared together). The analysis, a DeFries-Fulker regression within a hierarchical linear model, yielded findings on individual-level heritability ( h2), shared environmental effects ( c2), school-level effects, and school-level moderation of h2 and c2. The estimate of h2 for aggression in the full sample was .32, and c2 was .05. In the moderating effect, h2 increased and c2 decreased with greater school-level family warmth. Two effects on school means were found: Those schools with greater ethnic-racial heterogeneity had higher mean levels of aggression, and schools where students perceived greater family warmth had lower mean levels of aggression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9280.00150

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genetic influence on aggressive behavior was found to be higher in schools with higher average levels of family warmth, while environmental influences were more important in schools with lower average levels of family warmth.

    “Genetic influence on aggressive behavior was found to be higher in schools with higher average levels of family warmth. In contrast, environmental influences (both shared and nonshared) were more important in schools with lower average levels of family warmth (Rowe et al., 1999).”

    From Human Aggression Across the Lifespan (2011) · cites this paper as Rowe et al., 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rowe, D. C., Almeida, D. M., & Jacobson, K. C.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
1999-05
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
277-280
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2152687908
Cited by
74
References
20
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
adolescent aggression, heritability, shared environment, school context, family warmth, monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins, full siblings, half-siblings, behavioral genetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review