Cited by 163Thermoregulation and physiological responsesNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Basal perfusion of the cutaneous microcirculation: Measurements as a function of anatomic position

Open access
Tur, Ethel, Tur, Moshe, Maibach, Howard I., Guy, Richard H.·1983·Journal of Investigative Dermatology

Abstract

Noninvasive optical techniques of photopulse plethysmography (PPG) and laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) have been used to identify regional variations in the basal skin blood flow of humans. The procedures assess either the volume (PPG) or the volume-velocity product (LDV) of cutaneous blood vessel perfusion. Fifty-two anatomic positions have been studied in 10 normal subjects resting horizontally. The mean perfusion levels were ranked to reveal the variations in cutaneous blood flow as a function of body site. Groups of data were collected into cohorts and average perfusion values for the subjects within each cohort were compared by the Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test. Most transparently, the results reveal a collection of regions (fingers, palms, face, ears) for which cutaneous perfusion is much higher than all other positions. More subtle differences and some unexpected similarities, however, are also apparent and, in some cases, agree or, in others, conflict, with previously published information. With some exceptions, good general agreement between the two techniques was observed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12522619

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The hand and the face had significantly higher (p < 0.01) perfusion values than the trunk, upper, and lower limb.

    “It was found that the hand and the face had significantly higher (p < 0.01) perfusion values than the trunk, upper, and lower limb.”
  • The back of the ear and earlobe yielded significantly higher PPG signal amplitude than the hand and postauricular region, but LDV values and comparisons to the fingertips and the rest of the face were not significant.

    “The back of the ear and earlobe yielded significantly higher PPG signal amplitude than the hand and postauricular region (i.e., neck behind the ear), but LDV values and comparisons to the fingertips and the rest of the face were not significant.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tur, E., Tur, M., Maibach, H. I., & Guy, R. H.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-11
Volume
81
Issue
5
Pages
442-446
ISSN
0022-202X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999558969
Cited by
163
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
skin microcirculation, laser Doppler anemometry, skin blood flow, finger, Arecaceae, face, ear
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Lasers, Male, Microcirculation, Perfusion, Plethysmography, Regional Blood Flow, Skin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review