Cited by 1,962

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ENM eval: An R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for Maxent ecological niche models

Muscarella, Robert, Galante, Peter J., Soley‐Guardia, Mariano, Boria, Robert A., Kass, Jamie M., Uriarte, María, Anderson, Robert P.·2014·Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Abstract

Summary: Recent studies have demonstrated a need for increased rigour in building and evaluating ecological niche models ( ENM s) based on presence‐only occurrence data. Two major goals are to balance goodness‐of‐fit with model complexity (e.g. by ‘tuning’ model settings) and to evaluate models with spatially independent data. These issues are especially critical for data sets suffering from sampling bias, and for studies that require transferring models across space or time (e.g. responses to climate change or spread of invasive species). Efficient implementation of procedures to accomplish these goals, however, requires automation. We developed ENM eval , an R package that: (i) creates data sets for k ‐fold cross‐validation using one of several methods for partitioning occurrence data (including options for spatially independent partitions), (ii) builds a series of candidate models using Maxent with a variety of user‐defined settings and (iii) provides multiple evaluation metrics to aid in selecting optimal model settings. The six methods for partitioning data are n −1 jackknife, random k ‐folds ( = bins), user‐specified folds and three methods of masked geographically structured folds. ENM eval quantifies six evaluation metrics: the area under the curve of the receiver‐operating characteristic plot for test localities ( AUC TEST ), the difference between training and testing AUC ( AUC DIFF ), two different threshold‐based omission rates for test localities and the Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample sizes ( AIC c). We demonstrate ENM eval by tuning model settings for eight tree species of the genus Coccoloba in Puerto Rico based on AIC c. Evaluation metrics varied substantially across model settings, and models selected with AIC c differed from default ones. In summary, ENMeval facilitates the production of better ENM s and should promote future methodological research on many outstanding issues.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/2041-210x.12261

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00867.x · DOI
  2. 10.1111/nyas.12264 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.04.011 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01584.x · DOI
  5. 10.1890/11-1930.1 · DOI
  6. Bawiec W.J. ed. (1999)Geology geochemistry geophysics mineral occurrences and mineral resource assessment for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico: U.S. Geological Survey Open‐File Report 98‐038 available online only. · DOI
  7. 10.1177/0049124104268644 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.03.012 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/joc.937 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02659.x · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1017/S0376892997000088 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1214/13-AOAS667 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x · DOI
  16. 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1890/11-0826.1 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.tree.2008.02.001 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07872.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01594.x · DOI
  22. 10.23943/princeton/9780691136868.001.0001 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5378.x · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1890/07-2153.1 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1111/jbi.12227 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01824.x · DOI
  29. 10.2307/1935534 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.08.011 · DOI
  31. 10.1371/journal.pone.0055158 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02174.x · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00482.x · DOI
  34. 10.1111/ddi.12160 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00170.x · DOI
  36. 10.1111/2041-210x.12004 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Muscarella, R., Galante, P. J., Soley‐Guardia, M., Boria, R. A., Kass, J. M., Uriarte, M., & Anderson, R. P.
Affiliations
  • Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology Columbia University 1200 Amsterdam Ave. New York, NY 10027 USA
  • Department of Biology City College of the City University of New York 160 Convent Ave., New York NY 10031 USA
Venue
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-09-25
Volume
5
Issue
11
Pages
1198-1205
ISSN
2041-210X
Cited by
1,962
References
3
Language
en
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1311367, 1119915)
  • Graduate Center of the City University of New York
  • Luis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review