Cited by 50Child Abuse and TraumaSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChild Welfare and Adoption

Does child maltreatment predict alcohol use disorders in young adulthood? A cohort study of linked notifications and survey data

Open access
Kisely, Steve, Mills, Ryan, Strathearn, Lane, Najman, Jake M.·2020·Addiction

Abstract

Background and aims: Most studies of the association between child maltreatment and subsequent problem alcohol use are retrospective. We studied the association of prospectively substantiated child maltreatment with problem alcohol use in adulthood. Design: We used a prospective cohort record linkage correlational design using data from a statutory child protection agency of prospectively substantiated child maltreatment linked to a birth cohort from a major metropolitan maternity hospital. Setting: The Mater‐University of Queensland Study of Pregnancy in Brisbane, Australia. Participants: Of the 3762 young people at the 21‐year follow‐up, 169 (4.5%) had a history of substantiated maltreatment by 16 years. This was most commonly emotional abuse (n = 90). Measurements: The main outcome was heavy alcohol use at the 21‐year follow‐up, defined as four or more standard drinks per day. Secondary outcomes were life‐time and 12‐month diagnoses of alcohol use disorders in 2531 participants who completed the Composite International Diagnostic Interview‐auto (CIDI‐auto) version. Predictor variables were physical, sexual and emotional abuse, as well as neglect. Findings: At follow‐up, 407 of the 3762 participants reported heavy alcohol use (10.8%). On adjusted analyses, participants who had experienced emotional abuse were significantly more likely to report heavy alcohol use at the time of interview (adjusted odds ratio = 1.856; 95% confidence interval = 1.038–3.319; P = 0.037). Neglect was associated with a life‐time CIDI diagnosis of an alcohol use disorder. Other types of child maltreatment were not significantly associated with any of the outcomes. Conclusions: Prospectively identified experience of childhood emotional abuse and neglect appears to be positively associated with problem alcohol use at age 21.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.14794

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kisely, S., Mills, R., Strathearn, L., & Najman, J. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Kisely, Steve
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-10-18
Volume
115
Issue
1
Pages
61-68
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2970347639
Cited by
50
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7
FWCI
5.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
child abuse, alcoholism, heavy alcohol use, emotional abuse, child neglect, early adulthood, prospective cohort, child protection notifications
MeSH terms
Emotional Abuse, Adolescent, Alcoholism, Australia, Child, Child Abuse, Female, Humans, Male, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review