Cited by 23Smoking Behavior and CessationPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Co-occurring tobacco use and posttraumatic stress disorder: Smoking cessation treatment implications: Tobacco Use in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Kelly, Megan M., Jensen, Kevin P., Sofuoglu, Mehmet·2015·The American Journal on Addictions

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: PTSD and cigarette smoking frequently co-occur for reasons that are not well understood. The current behavioral and pharmacological treatments and emerging new treatment targets for smoking cessation are discussed. METHODS: Here we describe recent research on PTSD and smoking with an emphasis on 1) the clinical characteristics of smokers with PTSD, 2) smoking treatment trials that specifically targeted smokers with PTSD, 3) recent research on stress-response and affect regulation pathways that might link the two disorders and 4) potential ways to leverage new findings on stress response systems and affect regulation mechanisms to improve treatment outcomes for smokers with PTSD. RESULTS: Smokers with PTSD have higher rates of smoking compared to the general population and have greater difficulty quitting compared to smokers without PTSD. There have been several studies of adjunctive and integrated smoking cessation interventions for smokers with PTSD, but fewer tailored interventions that intensively target stress-response pathways or affect regulation related to both tobacco use and PTSD. Stress-response pathways and affect regulation appear to be important mechanisms involved in the development and maintenance of smoking in individuals with PTSD. CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Additional research that focuses on smokers with PTSD is warranted given that successful tobacco treatment response is low and the negative health effects of each disorder can be greatly amplified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajad.12304

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Kelly, M. M., Jensen, K. P., & Sofuoglu, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Megan M.
Venue
The American Journal on Addictions
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-11-19
Volume
24
Issue
8
Pages
695-704
ISSN
1055-0496 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2221521272
Cited by
23
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal on Addictions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
VISN 1 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, tobacco use, smoking cessation, comorbidities, stress response, emotion regulation, smoking cessation interventions, pharmacological smoking cessation
MeSH terms
Combined Modality Therapy, Humans, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Tobacco Use Disorder, Smoking Cessation, Treatment Outcome, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review