Cited by 483Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Endometriosis fertility index: the new, validated endometriosis staging system

Open access
Adamson, G. David, Pasta, David J.·2010·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To develop a clinical tool that predicts pregnancy rates (PRs) in patients with surgically documented endometriosis who attempt non-IVF conception.Design Prospective data collection on 579 patients and comprehensive statistical analysis to derive a new staging system--the endometriosis fertility index (EFI)--from data rather than a priori assumptions, followed by testing the EFI prospectively on 222 additional patients for correlation of predicted and actual outcomes.Setting Private reproductive endocrinology practice.Patient(s) A total of 801 consecutively diagnosed and treated infertile patients with endometriosis.Intervention(s) Surgical diagnosis and treatment followed by non-IVF fertility management.Main outcome measure(s) The EFI and life table PRs.Result(s) A statistically significant variable used to create the EFI was the least function score (i.e., the sum of those scores determined intraoperatively after surgical intervention that describe the function of the tube, fimbria, and ovary on both sides). Sensitivity analysis showed that the EFI varies little, even with variation in the assignment of functional scores, and predicted PRs.Conclusion(s) The EFI is a simple, robust, and validated clinical tool that predicts PRs after endometriosis surgical staging. Its use provides reassurance to those patients with good prognoses and avoids wasted time and treatment for those with poor prognoses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.035

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adamson, G. D., & Pasta, D. J.
Corresponding author
Adamson, G. David
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
94
Issue
5
Pages
1609-1615
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135591988
Cited by
483
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
FWCI
14.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
EMD Serono
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
Endometriosis Fertility Index, endometriosis staging, endometriosis-associated infertility, pregnancy rate prediction, surgical staging, ovarian function, fallopian tube function, prognostic tools
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Endometriosis, Endometrium, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Uterine Diseases, Proportional Hazards Models, Pregnancy Rate, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review