Cited by 13Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studiesUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

The 12‐month effects of structured lifestyle advice and pelvic floor muscle training for pelvic organ prolapse

Due, Ulla, Brostrøm, Søren, Lose, Gunnar·2016·Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Introduction: We evaluated the 12‐month effects of adding pelvic floor muscle training to a lifestyle advice program in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse stage II – III and the number of women who had sought further treatment. Material and methods: This study was a 12‐month follow up of a randomized controlled trial comparing a structured lifestyle advice program alone (lifestyle group) or in combination with pelvic floor muscle training (training and lifestyle group). Both programs consisted of six separate group sessions within 12 weeks. Results: Data were available from 83 (76%) of the 109 originally included women. At the 12‐month follow up, 34/83 (41%) had not sought further treatment, 13/43 (30%) in the lifestyle group and 21/40 (52%) in the training and lifestyle group, and these could be included for analysis. The lifestyle group had significantly improved bladder symptoms compared with baseline on single‐item analysis ( p = 0.01). The training and lifestyle group had significantly improved pelvic organ prolapse symptoms on single‐item analysis ( p = 0.02) and of bowel‐related quality of life ( p = 0.04). No significant between‐group differences were found in the symptom and quality of life scores. All together 49 women (59%) had sought further treatment, 70% in the lifestyle group, and 48% in the training and lifestyle group ( p = 0.05). Twenty‐six in the lifestyle group, and 15 in the training and lifestyle group had sought conservative treatment. Four women in each group had received surgery. More severe anterior prolapse and more bladder symptoms at the 3‐month follow up were significantly associated with having sought further treatment in both groups. Conclusions: At 12‐month follow up, the effects of adding pelvic floor muscle training to a structured lifestyle advice program were limited.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aogs.12884

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Due, U., Brostrøm, S., & Lose, G.
Affiliations
  • Herlev Hospital (DK)
  • National Board of Health (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Due, Ulla
Venue
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-24
Volume
95
Issue
7
Pages
811-819
ISSN
  • 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0412
OpenAlex
W2275269876
Cited by
13
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Danske Fysioterapeuter
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, pelvic floor muscle training, lifestyle advice, bladder symptoms, conservative treatment, women's health
MeSH terms
Exercise Therapy, Humans, Life Style, Quality of Life, Pelvic Floor, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review