Cited by 24Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studiesUterine Myomas and Treatments

The effect of pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: A meta-analysis

Wang, Ting, Wen, Zhengfang, Li, Meng·2022·International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis This study was aimed at evaluating the effect of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) as a conservative treatment for patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP).Methods A comprehensive search to identify eligible randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies was conducted using electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase up to 10 June 2021. Results were presented as risk ratio (RR), the weighted mean difference (WMD), with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) using the random effects model. Outcome variables were pooled using Review Manager version 5.3.Results Thirteen studies were included. Our results demonstrated that women who received PFMT intervention had a greater improvement than controls in prolapse symptom score (POP-SS; mean difference [MD] -1.66, 95% CI -2.36 to -0.97, p < 0.00001] and POP stages (risk ration [RR] 1.51, 95% CI 1.14-2.01, p = 0.004). The number of participants who felt better after PFMT was higher (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.21-3.24, p = 0.006). Subgroup analysis showed that the symptoms of prolapse and the degree of prolapse were improved significantly in the short term, but there was no significant difference in the long-term effect. In addition, there was no significant difference in the impact of PFMT on the elderly and the quality of life. More RCTs are needed to evaluate the effect of PFMT on the elderly and whether the quality of life can be improved.Conclusions We found that PFMT can improve subjective symptoms and objective POP severity. More research is needed on the long-term effect.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00192-022-05139-z

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wang, T., Wen, Z., & Li, M.
Affiliations
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University (CN)
  • First Hospital of Qinhuangdao (CN)
Corresponding author
Wen, Zhengfang
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2022-03-21
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
1789-1801
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W4220839548
Cited by
24
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Keywords
pelvic floor muscle training, pelvic organ prolapse, conservative treatment, quality of life, older women, long-term effects
MeSH terms
Aged, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Pelvic Floor, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review