Cited by 53Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studiesUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Comparative effect of 2 packages of pelvic floor muscle training on the clinical course of stage I–III pelvic organ prolapse

Kashyap, Rashmi, Jain, Vanita, Singh, Amarjeet·2013·International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of 2 packages of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) on the clinical course of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) among women attending a gynecology outpatient department in Chandigarh, India. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted between August 8, 2010, and October 31, 2011. Overall, 140 women with stage I–III POP were allocated to a 24‐week behavioral therapy intervention. Group A (n = 70) received 1‐to‐1 PFMT and a self‐instruction manual (SIM), whereas Group B (n = 70) received SIM alone. Symptoms were assessed using the POP symptom scale (POP‐ss), visual analog scale (VAS), and pelvic floor impact questionnaire‐7 (PFIQ‐7) scores. Results: Marked improvements in mean POP‐ss, VAS, PFIQ‐7 scores were observed in both groups from baseline to week 24. However, significant between‐group changes in mean POP‐ss scores were observed from baseline to 6 weeks ( P < 0.001), 18 weeks ( P = 0.001), and 24 weeks ( P = 0.002). Significant between‐group changes in mean VAS scores were observed at 18 and 24 weeks ( P = 0.009 and P = 0.005). Significant between‐group changes in mean PFIQ‐7 scores were observed at 6 ( P = 0.001), 18 ( P < 0.001), and 24 weeks ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: Provision of both 1‐to‐1 PFMT and SIM led to greater improvements in POP symptoms than provision of SIM alone. ctri.nic.in: CTRI/2010/091/001190 .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.11.012

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kashyap, R., Jain, V., & Singh, A.
Affiliations
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
Corresponding author
Kashyap, Rashmi
Venue
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-17
Volume
121
Issue
1
Pages
69-73
ISSN
  • 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
  • 0020-7292
  • 1879-3479
OpenAlex
W2027326853
Cited by
53
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
pelvic floor muscle training, pelvic organ prolapse, behavior therapy, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, prolapse symptoms, women's health
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Behavior Therapy, Exercise Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, India, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Pelvic Floor, Young Adult, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review