The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Uptrend in distress and psychiatric symptomatology in pregnant women during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Prenatal maternal distress has a negative impact on the course of pregnancy, fetal development, offspring development, and later psychopathologies. The study aimed to determine the extent to which the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic may aggravate the prenatal distress and psychiatric symptomatology of pregnant women. Material and methods: Two cohorts of pregnant volunteer women were evaluated, one that was recruited before the COVID‐19 pandemic (n = 496) through advertisements in prenatal clinics in Quebec, Canada, from April 2018 to March 2020; the other (n = 1258) was recruited online during the pandemic from 2 April to 13 April 2020. Prenatal distress and psychiatric symptomatology were measured with the Kessler Distress Scale (K10), Post‐traumatic Checklist for DSM‐5 (PCL‐5), Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES‐II), and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Results: The 1754 pregnant women (M age = 29.27, SD = 4.23) were between 4 and 41 gestational weeks (M = 24.80, SD = 9.42), were generally educated (91.3% had post‐high‐school training), and financially well‐resourced (85.3% were above the low‐income cut‐off). A multivariate analysis of covariance controlling for age, gestational age, household income, education, and lifetime psychiatric disorders showed a large effect size (ES) in the difference between the two cohorts on psychiatric symptoms (Wilks’ λ = 0.68, F6,1400 = 108.50, P < .001, partial η 2 = 0.32). According to post‐hoc analyses of covariance, the COVID‐19 women reported higher levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms (ES = 0.57), dissociative symptoms (ES = 0.22 and ES = 0.25), symptoms of post‐traumatic stress disorder (ES = 0.19), and negative affectivity (ES = 0.96), and less positive affectivity (ES = 0.95) than the pre‐COVID‐19 cohort. Women from the COVID‐19 cohort were more likely than pre‐COVID‐19 women to present clinically significant levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms (OR = 1.94, χ2[1] = 10.05, P = .002). Multiple regression analyses indicated that pregnant women in the COVID‐19 cohort having a previous psychiatric diagnosis or low income would be more prone to elevated distress and psychiatric symptoms. Conclusions: Pregnant women assessed during the COVID‐19 pandemic reported more distress and psychiatric symptoms than pregnant women assessed before the pandemic, mainly in the form of depression and anxiety symptoms. Given the harmful consequences of prenatal distress on mothers and offspring, the presently observed upsurge of symptoms in pregnant women calls for special means of clinical surveillance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
KESSLER, R. C., ANDREWS, G., COLPE, L. J., HIRIPI, E., MROCZEK, D. K., NORMAND, S.-L. T., WALTERS, E. E., & ZASLAVSKY, A. M. (2002) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291702006074 · Cited by 10,327
Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale
BERNSTEIN, E. M., & PUTNAM, F. W. (1986) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-198612000-00004 · Cited by 3,793
Interpreting scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)
Andrews, G., & Slade, T. (2001) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1111/j.1467-842x.2001.tb00310.x · Cited by 2,021
Psychological interventions for people affected by the COVID-19 epidemic
Duan, L., & Zhu, G. (2020) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30073-0 · Cited by 1,885
Ashbaugh, A. R., Houle-Johnson, S., Herbert, C., El-Hage, W., & Brunet, A. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161645 · Cited by 625
Glover, V. (2011) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02371.x · Cited by 569
Stress During Pregnancy Affects General Intellectual and Language Functioning in Human Toddlers
Laplante, D. P., Barr, R. G., Brunet, A., Du Fort, G. G., Meaney, M. L., Saucier, J.-F., Zelazo, P. R., & King, S. (2004) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1203/01.pdr.0000136281.34035.44 · Cited by 466
A Meta-Analysis of Maternal Prenatal Depression and Anxiety on Child Socioemotional Development
Madigan, S., Oatley, H., Racine, N., Fearon, R. M. P., Schumacher, L., Akbari, E., Cooke, J. E., & Tarabulsy, G. M. (2018) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2018.06.012 · Cited by 448
Laplante, D. P., Brunet, A., Schmitz, N., Ciampi, A., & King, S. (2008) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e31817eec80 · Cited by 424
Cited by
Chmielewska, B., Barratt, I., Townsend, R., Kalafat, E., van der Meulen, J., Gurol-Urganci, I., O'Brien, P., Morris, E., Draycott, T., Thangaratinam, S., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(21)00079-6 · Cited by 1,092
The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on women's mental health
Almeida, M., Shrestha, A. D., Stojanac, D., & Miller, L. J. (2020) · Archives of Women s Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-020-01092-2 · Cited by 583
Manchia, M., Gathier, A. W., Yapici-Eser, H., Schmidt, M. V., de Quervain, D., van Amelsvoort, T., Bisson, J. I., Cryan, J. F., Howes, O. D., Pinto, L., et al. (2022) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.10.864 · Cited by 484
Yuan, K., Gong, Y.-M., Liu, L., Sun, Y.-K., Tian, S.-S., Wang, Y.-J., Zhong, Y., Zhang, A.-Y., Su, S.-Z., Liu, X.-X., et al. (2021) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01036-x · Cited by 300
Yan, H., Ding, Y., & Guo, W. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.617001 · Cited by 267
Mental health of pregnant and postpartum women in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
Perzow, S. E. D., Hennessey, E.-M. P., Hoffman, M. C., Grote, N. K., Davis, E. P., & Hankin, B. L. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100123 · Cited by 156
Manning, K. Y., Long, X., Watts, D., Tomfohr-Madsen, L., Giesbrecht, G. F., & Lebel, C. (2022) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.05.011 · Cited by 51
Wathelet, M., Fovet, T., Jousset, A., Duhem, S., Habran, E., Horn, M., Debien, C., Notredame, C.-E., Baubet, T., Vaiva, G., et al. (2021) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-021-01438-z · Cited by 50
“Quarantine, event of interest in our study, is highlighted. identified in our sample is higher than the PTSD rates in other populations: 7% in China’s hardest-hit areas according to Liu et al.22, 3.8% among front-line health care workers in China according to Yin et al.23, 1.2% among Canadian pregnant women according…”
BackgroundInfluentialHamidia, A., Kheirkhah, F., Faramarzi, M., Basirat, Z., Ghadimi, R., Chehrazi, M., Barat, S., Cuijpers, P., O’Connor, E., & Mirtabar, S. M. (2021) · Indian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_1272_20 · Cited by 16
“[19] The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5) definition of PTSD has emphasized that “a life-threatening illness or debilitating medical condition is not necessarily considered a traumatic event.””
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Berthelot, N., Lemieux, R., Garon‐Bissonnette, J., Drouin‐Maziade, C., Martel, É., & Maziade, M.
- Venue
- Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-06-03
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 848-855
- ISSN
- 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0412
- OpenAlex
- W3027373195
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 64.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
