Cited by 51Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumCOVID-19 and Mental HealthCOVID-19 Impact on Reproduction

Prenatal Maternal Distress During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Associations With Infant Brain Connectivity

Open access
Manning, Kathryn Y., Long, Xiangyu, Watts, Dana, Tomfohr-Madsen, Lianne, Giesbrecht, Gerald F., Lebel, Catherine·2022·Biological Psychiatry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has caused substantially elevated distress in pregnant individuals, which has the potential to affect the developing infant brain. Our main objective was to understand how prenatal distress was related to infant brain structure and function and whether social support moderated the associations.Methods The Pregnancy during the COVID-19 Pandemic (PdP) cohort study collected Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Anxiety scale, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, and Social Support Effectiveness Questionnaire data from a population-based sample of pregnant individuals living in Canada (N = 8602). For a subsample of participants, their infants (n = 75) underwent magnetic resonance imaging at 3 months of age to examine whether prenatal maternal distress was associated with infant brain architecture, including the role of social support as a potential protective factor.Results Overall, 33.4% of participants demonstrated clinically elevated depression symptoms and 47.1% of participants demonstrated clinically elevated anxiety symptoms. We identified lower social support as a significant predictor of clinically elevated prenatal maternal distress (t 8598 = -22.3, p < .001). Fifty-eight diffusion image datasets (20 female/38 male, 92 ± 14 days old) and 41 functional datasets (13 female/28 male, 92 ± 14 days old) were included in our analysis after removal of poor-quality images and infants without postpartum maternal distress scores. We found significant relationships between prenatal maternal distress and infant amygdala-prefrontal microstructural and functional connectivity measures, and we demonstrate for the first time that social support moderates these relationships.Conclusions Our findings suggest a potentially long-lasting impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on children and show that social support acts as a possible mediator not just for pregnant individuals but also developing infants. These findings provide timely evidence to inform clinical practice and policy surrounding the care of pregnant individuals and highlight the importance of social support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.05.011

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Infants of women who were pregnant during the COVID-19 pandemic with low social support display weaker connectivity between the right amygdala and superior orbitofrontal cortex.

    “Infants of women who were pregnant during the COVID-19 pandemic with low social support reportedly display weaker connectivity between the right amygdala and superior orbitofrontal cortex [113].”

    From Brain structural and functional outcomes in the offspring of women experiencing psychological distress during pregnancy (2024) · cites this paper as [113]

    The Results (Infant Brain Structure and Function) report weaker right amygdala–superior orbitofrontal connectivity with higher prenatal distress among infants whose mothers reported low social support. The claim omits the higher-distress condition and implies that low social support alone is associated with weaker connectivity, which the passage does not establish. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manning, K. Y., Long, X., Watts, D., Tomfohr-Madsen, L., Giesbrecht, G. F., & Lebel, C.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Lebel, Catherine
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
92
Issue
9
Pages
701-708
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4280587578
Cited by
51
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11
FWCI
10.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canada Research Chairs
  • Gesellschaft für Genetik
  • Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, social support, maternal anxiety, postpartum depression, amygdala, prefrontal cortex, functional connectivity, infant brain development
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Anxiety, Brain, Child, Depression, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Pregnancy, Cohort Studies, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review