Cited by 115Gastrointestinal motility and disordersPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research

Irritable bowel syndrome is significantly associated with somatisation in 840 patients, which may drive bloating

Open access
Patel, P., Bercik, P., Morgan, D. G., Bolino, C., Pintos‐Sanchez, M. I., Moayyedi, P., Ford, A. C.·2015·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Summary: Background: Psychological factors may influence persistence and perceived severity of symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Literature suggests that somatisation is associated with IBS. However, the relationship between IBS subtype, symptoms of IBS and somatisation is unclear. Aim: To examine this issue in a large cohort of secondary care patients. Methods: Demographic and gastrointestinal (GI) symptom data were collected from 4224 adult patients via the Rome III questionnaire. Somatisation data were collected using the patient health questionnaire‐12. Mean somatisation score and number of somatic symptoms were compared between IBS patients and controls with minimal GI symptoms, and between IBS subtypes using analysis of variance. Effect of level of somatisation on symptom frequency was compared according to IBS subtype using a χ 2 test. Results: 840 patients met Rome III criteria for IBS, controls were 2137 patients with GI symptoms without IBS. Mean somatisation scores and number of somatic symptoms were higher in IBS vs. controls (P < 0.001), and in mixed stool pattern IBS (IBS‐M), vs. IBS with constipation (IBS‐C) or diarrhoea (IBS‐D) (P < 0.001). High levels of somatisation were more prevalent in IBS‐M (31.7%) vs. IBS‐C (22.5%) or IBS‐D (20.8%) (P = 0.003). For all IBS subtypes, high levels of somatisation were associated with a greater frequency of bloating or abdominal distension prior to logistic regression. Conclusions: IBS is strongly associated with higher levels of somatisation, particularly IBS‐M. Bloating may be associated with higher levels of somatisation, perhaps explaining why it can be difficult to treat.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apt.13074

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Altered visceral sensation in IBS is characterised by central abnormalities in sensory, emotional arousal, and prefrontal cortical regions of the brain.

    “Altered visceral sensation in IBS is characterised by central abnormalities in sensory, emotional arousal, and prefrontal cortical regions of the brain.”

    From Irritable bowel syndrome (2020) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Introduction and Discussion address psychological symptoms, somatisation, and bloating in IBS, but do not describe abnormalities in brain regions. Searches for the quoted phrase and for visceral sensation, cortical regions, and brain imaging found no passage addressing the claimed central abnormalities; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patel, P., Bercik, P., Morgan, D. G., Bolino, C., Pintos‐Sanchez, M. I., Moayyedi, P., & Ford, A. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Gastroenterology Division Health Sciences Center Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada
  • St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Ford, A. C.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01-14
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
449-458
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W2033219095
Cited by
115
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12
FWCI
12.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, somatization, bloating, abdominal distension, IBS subtypes, IBS-M, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, psychological factors, Rome III criteria, symptom severity
MeSH terms
Adult, Constipation, Diarrhea, Female, Flatulence, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Socioeconomic Factors, Somatoform Disorders, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review