Cited by 59Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and care

Optimising mindfulness-based stress reduction for people with multiple sclerosis

Simpson, Robert, Byrne, Sharon, Wood, Karen, Mair, Frances S, Mercer, Stewart W·2018·Chronic Illness

Abstract

Objectives: To gather views from patients with multiple sclerosis after completing a standard eight-week mindfulness-based stress reduction course and optimise and test a modified version as required. Methods: Two successive groups of 25 multiple sclerosis patients received mindfulness-based stress reduction in a wait-list randomised controlled trial. Seventeen participants and two mindfulness-based stress reduction instructors were individually interviewed after the first (standard) course and 16 participants and the same two instructors were interviewed following the second (optimised) course. Interviews were analysed using a thematic approach. Results: Mindfulness-based stress reduction was well received in both groups, with participants describing a beneficial shift in awareness. An initial (at times unpleasant) increase in awareness of disability was generally followed by greater acceptance and self-compassion. Other benefits reported included improved relationships, walking and sleep, with less stress and pain. Mindful-movement and mindful walking were problematic in group 1. This component of mindfulness-based stress reduction was simplified in group 2. A pre-course orientation session was introduced, and some organisational changes made based on feedback from group 1. Feedback from group 2 was positive in all these areas. Discussion: Mindfulness-based stress reduction appears beneficial to people with multiple sclerosis, albeit mindful-movement required some modification. Contextual and organisational issues also appear important in this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1742395317715504

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simpson, R., Byrne, S., Wood, K., Mair, F. S., & Mercer, S. W.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Simpson, Robert
Venue
Chronic Illness
Published
2017-06-29
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
154-166
ISSN
  • 1742-3953 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9206
OpenAlex
W2726858776
Cited by
59
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 7
FWCI
11.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chronic Illness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, multiple sclerosis, patient feedback, mindful movement, mindful walking, acceptance, self-compassion, disability awareness, stress, pain, sleep, relationships, organizational challenges
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Awareness, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Stress, Psychological, Treatment Outcome, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review