Executive Functioning and Mathematics Achievement
Abstract
The importance of executive functioning ( EF ) skills in mathematical achievement is well established, and researchers have moved from just measuring working memory or updating to an inclusion of other EF skills, namely, inhibition and shifting. In this article, we review studies that have taken different approaches to measuring EF (e.g., using single vs. multiple indicators) and those that have applied different analytical techniques to conceptualize the structure of EF (e.g., exploratory vs. confirmatory techniques). Across studies, updating is often a unique predictor of math achievement at many ages; the findings relating to inhibition and switching are less conclusive. We discuss these findings in relation to age‐related variance in EF structure, the nature of inhibitory and shifting task requirements, and the role of updating as a limiting factor or a common resource for inhibition and shifting.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The inherent demand of mathematics activities on executive functions is highlighted by conceptual and content-based analyses, achievement analyses, neurobiology of mathematical thinking, and textbook exercises.
“The inherent demand of mathematics activities on executive functions is highlighted by conceptual and content-based analyses of early mathematics learning activities for young children (Blair et al. 2008b, Bull & Lee 2014) as well as by analyses of mathematics achievement (Espy et al. 2004).”
From School Readiness and Self-Regulation: A Developmental Psychobiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as Bull & Lee 2014
Cites
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 · Cited by 15,798 · see citing works
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860 · see citing works
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721411429458 · Cited by 3,944 · see citing works
Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x · Cited by 3,140 · see citing works
Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review
Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028228 · Cited by 1,782 · see citing works
Bull, R., Espy, K. A., & Wiebe, S. A. (2008) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565640801982312 · Cited by 1,544 · see citing works
Self-citationBull, R., & Scerif, G. (2001) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn1903_3 · Cited by 1,501 · see citing works
Self-citationExecutive functions and achievements in school: Shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memory
St Clair-Thompson, H. L., & Gathercole, S. E. (2006) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470210500162854 · Cited by 1,278 · see citing works
Training and transfer effects of executive functions in preschool children
Thorell, L. B., Lindqvist, S., Bergman Nutley, S., Bohlin, G., & Klingberg, T. (2009) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00745.x · Cited by 1,041 · see citing works
Raghubar, K. P., Barnes, M. A., & Hecht, S. A. (2010) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.005 · Cited by 975 · see citing works
Karbach, J., & Kray, J. (2009) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00846.x · Cited by 694 · see citing works
Preschool executive functioning abilities predict early mathematics achievement
Clark, C. A. C., Pritchard, V. E., & Woodward, L. J. (2010) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019672 · Cited by 671 · see citing works
What is working memory capacity, and how can we measure it?
Wilhelm, O., Hildebrandt, A., & Oberauer, K. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00433 · Cited by 468 · see citing works
Shifting ability predicts math and reading performance in children: a meta-analytical study
Yeniad, N., Malda, M., Mesman, J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Pieper, S. (2013) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.004 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
The development of executive functions and early mathematics: A dynamic relationship
Van der Ven, S. H. G., Kroesbergen, E. H., Boom, J., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2012) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02035.x · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Andersson, U. (2010) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016838 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Roebers, C. M., Cimeli, P., Röthlisberger, M., & Neuenschwander, R. (2012) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-012-9089-9 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
School Readiness and Self-Regulation: A Developmental Psychobiological Approach
Blair, C., & Raver, C. C. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015221 · Cited by 1,240 · see citing works
Ahmed, S. F., Tang, S., Waters, N. E., & Davis-Kean, P. (2019) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000296 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Ren, X., Tong, Y., Peng, P., & Wang, T. (2020) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2020.101487 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Schmidt, M., Mavilidi, M. F., Singh, A., & Englert, C. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101908 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Stucke, N. J., & Doebel, S. (2024) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000445 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Ramani, G. B., Daubert, E. N., Lin, G. C., Kamarsu, S., Wodzinski, A., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2020) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12908 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Cassidy, A. R. (2016) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049.2014.994484 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Lee, K., Ng, S. F., & Bull, R. (2018) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000561 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Bull, R., & Lee, K.
- Affiliations
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Bull, Rebecca
- Venue
- Child Development Perspectives
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-02-11
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-41
- ISSN
- 1750-8592 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-8606
- OpenAlex
- W2139318759
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 48 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 38.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Child Development Perspectives (publishedVersion)
- NIE Digital Repository (National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- executive function, mathematics achievement, working memory updating, inhibition, cognitive flexibility, age differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review